Re: [Gambas-user] (no subject)

2012-03-20 Thread richard terry
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 06:05:35 Benoît Minisini wrote: Hopefully windows will die out one day... and anyone buying a mac probably has rocks in their brain anyway... Viva Linux Richard > Le 20/03/2012 16:27, Rob Kudla a écrit : > > ... > > Someone did get the Gambas 1.x interpreter port

Re: [Gambas-user] (no subject)

2012-03-20 Thread Benoît Minisini
Le 20/03/2012 16:27, Rob Kudla a écrit : > ... > Someone did get the Gambas 1.x interpreter ported, > if I remember correctly, but porting gb.qt (at the time gb.gtk wasn't > mature) was problematic due to Windows having no X server. So it would > run command-line "hello world" type stuff but that w

Re: [Gambas-user] (no subject)

2012-03-20 Thread Rob Kudla
On 03/20/2012 09:14 AM, Mathias wrote: > Me neither, I never use Windows/Mac. > It's not really for us. More for the users we develop for. > It would be nice if we could distribute our app to 95% of all computerusers, > instead of 2%. At one time I did care, to the point where I developed an app

Re: [Gambas-user] (no subject)

2012-03-20 Thread Rolf-Werner Eilert
Hi Mathias, > GTK (the frontend that gambas can use) works perfectly under Windows. Wasn't Qt made for use with Windows, too? > I'm not a Windows user, but wouldn't it be great if you could sell your > product to Windows users? > Without porting your code? Because, if the interpreter is ported,

Re: [Gambas-user] (no subject)

2012-03-20 Thread Mathias
Me neither, I never use Windows/Mac. It's not really for us. More for the users we develop for. It would be nice if we could distribute our app to 95% of all computerusers, instead of 2%. As I said before: I'm not proposing to port Gambas to Windows, only the interpreter. > "We all" don't run

Re: [Gambas-user] (no subject)

2012-03-20 Thread Rob Kudla
On 03/20/2012 05:03 AM, Mathias Maes wrote: > If we all support a small donation, maybe we could hire a freelancer, who > ports the interpreter. > Any comments? "We all" don't run Windows. I haven't owned a machine running Windows in 10 years, and have never owned any Apple products. There was an

Re: [Gambas-user] WebPage support in Gambas

2012-03-20 Thread Benoît Minisini
Le 20/03/2012 10:57, jm a écrit : > > What about making the include<%{OtherWebPage}%> > into a C like format i.e.<% #include OtherWebPage.html %> > and the renderer cleanly snips everything between<%..%> > including the<% and %> > and replaced it with whatever is inside OtherWebPage.html > > The i

Re: [Gambas-user] (no subject)

2012-03-20 Thread Mathias Maes
Pretty cool story actually! I hope you make some profit this year! But, the underlying techniques you're using (postgrsql) works perfectly under Windows. GTK (the frontend that gambas can use) works perfectly under Windows. I'm not a Windows user, but wouldn't it be great if you could sell your p

Re: [Gambas-user] (no subject)

2012-03-20 Thread Bruce Bruen
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 10:03 +0100, Mathias Maes wrote: > Hello, > > Gambas is great, but there is one small thing why it isn't widly used. No > cross-platform. > Well, I know only a little bit of the inner workings of Gambas, but: > > I've been looking to a lot of event-driven Basic dialects, and

Re: [Gambas-user] WebPage support in Gambas

2012-03-20 Thread jm
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 14:29 +0100, Benoît Minisini wrote: > Hi, > > In revision #4561, Gambas compiler now can compile WebPage. > > What is a WebPage ? > > WebPage is a new "form" type that you enable in the IDE by using the > 'gb.web' component. > > It generates an HTML page from an HTML

[Gambas-user] (no subject)

2012-03-20 Thread Mathias Maes
Hello, Gambas is great, but there is one small thing why it isn't widly used. No cross-platform. Well, I know only a little bit of the inner workings of Gambas, but: I've been looking to a lot of event-driven Basic dialects, and the best one, that was most widely useable: RealBasic. Why? Just bec