RE: [Ganglia-developers] Latest on IRIX

2002-08-27 Thread James Braid
> I guess it's possible that the intf_* stuff doesn't work well > on multi-proc > SGIs. Any ideas? > No ideas sorry, but I can also confirm this was happening on my IRIX boxes. I never tried it on a uni-proc box (compiling stuff on an Indy really bites) so I just assumed it was an IRIX thing.

[Ganglia-developers] Latest on IRIX

2002-08-27 Thread Steven Wagner
FYI, on IRIX 6.5 I'm seeing the latest CVS build of gmond choke after running the pasted-in Linux mtu_func() ... but only on multi-processor systems. What actually happens is that the data collection works OK - it walks the (four-interface-long) list of network interfaces, determines the lowest

[Ganglia-developers] gmetad

2002-08-27 Thread matt massie
guys- i just checked in the C code for gmetad into CVS. it's not finished but i should have a working version within a few day. if you find anything wrong with the CVS source, please let me know. i want to finish up the C version of gmetad in the next few days and then release 2.5.0. the

[Ganglia-developers] minor rpm spec file improvement.

2002-08-27 Thread Jason A. Smith
I just noticed a small mistake in the rpm spec file for the ganglia monitoring core. In the build section, configure is executed with prefix set to $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr. It should actually be executed with the real prefix defined: ./configure --prefix=/usr and later in the install section, you s

[Ganglia-developers] A change in metric-gathering philosophy? [long]

2002-08-27 Thread Steven Wagner
I've written more than my share of machine.c's, folks, and in doing so I've noticed that I do the same thing over and over again. Namely, I almost always chuck the "I'll go query the appropriate subsystem, discard all the data I don't need for this metric, and return the result" method in favo