Re: [Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0.

2004-12-15 Thread Martin Knoblauch
--- Matt Massie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i just uploaded a nearly functional snapshot of 2.6.0 to > http://matt-massie.com/ganglia/ganglia-2.6.0.200412151451.tar.gz > > what i mean by nearly functional is that i need feedback from the > developers before stitch up and close surgery on 2.6.0.

[Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0.

2004-12-15 Thread Matt Massie
i just uploaded a nearly functional snapshot of 2.6.0 to http://matt-massie.com/ganglia/ganglia-2.6.0.200412151451.tar.gz what i mean by nearly functional is that i need feedback from the developers before stitch up and close surgery on 2.6.0. more on that follows. i've tested this version o

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Re: 2.6.0? 2.5.8? 3.0.0? (frustration...)

2004-12-15 Thread Adeyemi Adesanya
Martin, I was under the impression that we were close to finalizing the new features/fixes for 2.5.8. Several of them have been floating around for a while and I really feel like the rug has been pulled from underneath me. Anyone who runs Ganglia on Solaris will know how I feel. When I realiz

[Ganglia-developers] Patch to add pseudo metrics to list in cluster view.

2004-12-15 Thread Jason A. Smith
Way back in webfrontend version 2.5.3, two pseudo metrics were included in the metric list when looking at the cluster view (gmond_started & last_reported). They are actually attributes to the HOST tag, but were included in the metric list like all of the other real metrics. They appear to have b

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Re: 2.6.0? 2.5.8? 3.0.0? (frustration...)

2004-12-15 Thread Martin Knoblauch
Hi, personally I also was a bit surprised about the move into 2.6.0. I would have liked to see a 2.5.8 with the few remaining bug-fixes and Solaris using "kstat". No metrics rearrangements (we could have added Linux/cpu_wio at the end of the list) and no fancy new confugation options. Not sure wh