Re: [Ganglia-developers] bugzilla installation

2005-01-10 Thread Robert Walsh
> yeh or neh? Oh yeh, definitely. Bugzilla may not be perfect, but it's 95% of the way there and is better than any of the free or commercial stuff I've ever used. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Amalgamated Durables, Inc. - "We don't make the things you buy." Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] si

RE: [Ganglia-developers] Re: 2.6.0? 2.5.8? 3.0.0? (frustration...)

2005-01-10 Thread Bernard Li
Hey Matt and others: IRC would be cool, in fact there is already a #ganglia channel on freenode (though it's mostly for user-support). Cheers, Bernard > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Matt Massie > Sent: Monday, January 10, 200

RE: [Ganglia-developers] organizing the ganglia project

2005-01-10 Thread Bernard Li
Hey Matt: We use the sf bug tracker for our project and it seems to serve our purpose. I'd suggest giving it a try and if it proves insufficient then try something else. Cheers, Bernard > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Matt Ma

[Ganglia-developers] bugzilla installation

2005-01-10 Thread Matt Massie
guys- i went ahead and setup a ganglia bugzilla server. it's available at http://bugzilla.ganglia.info/ (to be honest.. i did very little to set it up. our local debian guru, mike howard, spent about 1/2 hour to set it up...) i won't link it to the ganglia web site or announce it to users

[Ganglia-developers] organizing the ganglia project

2005-01-10 Thread Matt Massie
guys- ganglia is growing to big to be managed simply by an email list. i could turn back on the sourceforge features for submitting patches/bugs etc but i remember that it was a horribly confusing ui and not very functional... although i'm beginning to believe that something is better than n

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0.

2005-01-10 Thread Matt Massie
Martin Knoblauch wrote: --- Matt Massie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i just uploaded a nearly functional snapshot of 2.6.0 to http://matt-massie.com/ganglia/ganglia-2.6.0.200412151451.tar.gz what i mean by nearly functional is that i need feedback from the developers before stitch up and clo

[Ganglia-developers] Re: 2.6.0? 2.5.8? 3.0.0? (frustration...)

2005-01-10 Thread Matt Massie
i'm based in berkeley and i'd be happy to drop by and chat with SLAC about ganglia... i'll be pretty busy over the next few weeks but then my schedule should open. i remember someone on the list talking about building regular irc meetings for developers to just chat and catch up. something li

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0.

2005-01-10 Thread Matt Massie
what is the compatibility level of 2.6.0 compared to 2.5.7? Can one use old gmond.conf unaltered? no. there is a new format but it will be easy to convert from one to the other. this change was necessary to support multiple unicast channels and allow for people to modify the internal metric

[Ganglia-developers] Re: My improvements of Ganglia 2.5.8

2005-01-10 Thread Matt Massie
antonin- i really like what you've done here. i just reviewed your so_api25 setup and it's right in line with the direction ganglia is headed. we need a dso model where arbitrary metric can be easily registered. the think that holds this up is that the network protocol needs to be extended

[Ganglia-developers] Re: 2.5.8 unicast feedback

2005-01-10 Thread Matt Massie
i'm going through my inbox today and trying to get caught up. i'm back in berkeley and ready to get back to work. Adeyemi Adesanya wrote: Hi. I have just been testing ganglia-monitor-core-2.5.8.200411241228.tar.gz that I downloaded from Matt's web site. Happy to see that the Solaris code