>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 6:53 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 03:57:40PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>>I new there was something that I was missing when I checked in the header
> file changes. It appears
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 03:57:40PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>I new there was something that I was missing when I checked in the header
> file changes. It appears that I broke the 32-bit builds. I am trying to get
> the problem fixed and it has to do with adding -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE to t
Hi Timothy:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Witham, Timothy D
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But unfortunately, r1142 reverts to giving incomplete sums in the
> metrics, so bug#76 is back:
>
> # perl -e 'while(1){print `netcat localhost 39003 | grep "cpu_num"`; }'
>
>SLOPE="zero" SOURCE="gm
Hi Matt:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Matt Massie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm not sure what happened exactly. bernard's detective work found that
> some of our "pages" were changed into "posts" and one of the wordpress
> plugins was disabled. i've copied our pages back in and updated
I new there was something that I was missing when I checked in the header
file changes. It appears that I broke the 32-bit builds. I am trying to get
the problem fixed and it has to do with adding -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE to the
libmetrics Makefile.am's. I just wanted to let the list know tha
> On a somewhat related note, I have often wondered what the CPU or
Network > graphs might look like at the higher grid levels. Obviously
we can't add > any more than 2 graphs to the page; it would get too
wide.
Hmmm, with Bernard's separate template for the $self top node, you could
show all 4 r
On a somewhat related note, I have often wondered what the CPU or
Network graphs might look like at the higher grid levels. Obviously we
can't add any more than 2 graphs to the page; it would get too wide.
Here's a simple hack to add a couple small clickable words instead.
-twitham
Index: meta_v
Bernard said:
> My patch is bit more involved, but will allow you to simply click on
> the graph to zoom in (instead of a '*' which was artificially added):
Ah, excellent approach, I like it better than mine! With a slight hack,
we can do it much simpler with no new blocks, as shown below. If t
Hi Carlo,
>> Looks like gmetad in trunk is broken. When I request summary
>> information it segfaults:
>the newer implementation from r1142 shouldn't segfault anymore.
No seg fault for me on Linux and I agree that is a cleaner place to put
the lock. I had considered that but thought it might l
FYI, I have been working on rearranging the headers so that they are more
inline with a development environment that can be used to develop metric
modules outside of the Ganglia source tree. Hopefully later today I will be
checking in these changes. This will affect a large number of source f
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:58:53PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
> Hi guys:
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 08:07:49AM -0700, Witham, Timothy D wrote:
> > >
> > > If we remove the conditional the lock should
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 01:07:53PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
> I actually like the format better as it tells the exact Ganglia
> version number:
the man pages generated with help2man also include the version number
but were post edited to remove that, as they are meant to be
generic enough to be co
12 matches
Mail list logo
