>>
>>> One other problem. After doing a configure and make I tried to do a make
>>>
>> distdir just to get the built files in the web directory. In the resulting
>> dist directory, nothing was built in the web directory. conf.php.in was
>> there but no conf.php etc. Is there so
>>> On 2/3/2010 at 3:41 PM, in message <4b69fbb1.6090...@pocock.com.au>, Daniel
Pocock wrote:
> Brad Nicholes wrote:
> On 2/3/2010 at 03:06 PM, in message <4b69f36a.40...@pocock.com.au>, Daniel
>
>> Pocock wrote:
>>
>>
I have tried a quick test of your latest snap shot a
Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 2/3/2010 at 03:06 PM, in message <4b69f36a.40...@pocock.com.au>, Daniel
> Pocock wrote:
>
>
>>> I have tried a quick test of your latest snap shot and so far the only
>>> thing
>>>
>> that I am seeing is that the include path to the conf.d di
>>> On 2/3/2010 at 03:06 PM, in message <4b69f36a.40...@pocock.com.au>, Daniel
Pocock wrote:
>> I have tried a quick test of your latest snap shot and so far the only thing
> that I am seeing is that the include path to the conf.d directory in the
> gmond.conf file is not getting set correctly
> I have tried a quick test of your latest snap shot and so far the only thing
> that I am seeing is that the include path to the conf.d directory in the
> gmond.conf file is not getting set correctly. It is still pointing to
> ./conf.d/*.conf rather than the value that was passed in with --sy
I've just tested the diff for building the Debian package, to work with
3.1.6, it needs the following added to configure:
--sysconfdir=/etc/ganglia
and the following in debian/control:
Build-Depends: add libpcre3-dev
I notice that /usr/lib/ganglia/mod*.so is installed as part
- Original Message
> From: Daniel Pocock
> To: Martin Knoblauch
> Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Wed, February 3, 2010 4:47:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Policy on updating files in 3.1.x/contrib
>
> Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > - Original Message -
Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>
>> From: Daniel Pocock
>> To: Martin Knoblauch
>> Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Sent: Wed, February 3, 2010 1:04:51 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Policy on updating files in 3.1.x/contrib
>>
>>
>>
>>> w
>>> On 2/3/2010 at 5:04 AM, in message <4b696663.6010...@pocock.com.au>, Daniel
Pocock wrote:
>> what is the policy for updating files in the "contrib" directory of 3.0.x
> and 3.1.x? Do I need to do the backport approval dance (*)? Or can I just go
> ahead. The "removespikes.pl" file needs an
- Original Message
> From: Daniel Pocock
> To: Martin Knoblauch
> Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Wed, February 3, 2010 1:04:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Policy on updating files in 3.1.x/contrib
>
>
> > what is the policy for updating files in the "
> what is the policy for updating files in the "contrib" directory of 3.0.x
> and 3.1.x? Do I need to do the backport approval dance (*)? Or can I just go
> ahead. The "removespikes.pl" file needs an update in the 3.1.x branch.
>
>
Any updates to 3.1 require co-ordination from the release ma
Hi,
what is the policy for updating files in the "contrib" directory of 3.0.x and
3.1.x? Do I need to do the backport approval dance (*)? Or can I just go ahead.
The "removespikes.pl" file needs an update in the 3.1.x branch.
Cheers
Martin
(*) No, I never liked the process ...
---
12 matches
Mail list logo
