It looks like github is presenting nothing but problems. Anything that I have
had to install from there has always been a big hassle. Perhaps a more
simplified solution should be implemented.
From: Daniel Pocock
To: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon ; Vladimir Vuksa
Instead of spending time on creating a new web interface, it would have been
more productive to create a stable version gmond that runs on Windows Server
2008 R2. :)
I prefer the original interface anyways.
From: Vladimir Vuksan
To: Martin Knoblauch
Cc:
awks
To: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Protocol Efficiency Ideas
On 1/27/12 2:05 PM, Im Root wrote:
> I forgot to add that by adding json, you will be restricting the types
> of Linux that this platform runs
using only the flavors of
linux that the keepers of json feel like using. Sorry, but adding the json
dependency is a completely boneheaded move.
____
From: Im Root
To: Dave Rawks ; "ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net"
Sent: Friday, January 27,
I believe that adding json would be a mistake. The reason is that when users
install the main package there would be now a dependency on having json
installed. It just adds to the complexity and helps to perpetuate RPM hell.
I've had to deal with installing json in the past and it's been awful.
I would be in agreement with the sentiments of the ganglia maintainers in that
I too hate Windows. Unfortunately I'm stuck with it.
From: Jeff Buchbinder
To: Im Root
Cc: Daniel Pocock ;
"ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net"
Sent: T
not quite right.
When you supply a data collection module that crashes systems, then it needs to
be fixed.
From: Nick Satterly
To: Daniel Pocock
Cc: Im Root ; "ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net"
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 3:33 PM
S
From: Daniel Pocock
To: Im Root
Cc: Vladimir Vuksan ;
"ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net"
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved
On 17/01/12 21:17, Im Root wrote:
> I can understand if obscure operating systems
8 systems
so can't test it. I would just note in release notes that Windows 2008 is
not supported.
That said I am not in favor of holding off the release. If someone wants
to contribute Windows patches we can release that as 4.0.1 or later.
Vladimir
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Daniel Pocock wrote
To: Im Root
Cc: "ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net"
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved
On 17/01/12 19:59, Im Root wrote:
> We should also bundle the new monitor core with a version of gmond that
> runs on Wi
We should also bundle the new monitor core with a version of gmond that runs on
Windows 2008 r2 as well. The ganglia web front end loses some of it's
monitoring functionality when it can't monitor basic operating systems.
Besides, it only makes sense to keep ALL of the basic components up to dat
for Windows.
Vladimir
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Im Root wrote:
> I'm not interested in deploying a completely new infrastructure. I already
> have an extensive ganglia setup and can
> see all my servers except for a growing number of Win2k8r2 servers. If we can
> get them to report to
Thanks Jeff.
The pmond setup looks really crude but I'll give it a try and see how it does.
From: Jeff Buchbinder
To: Im Root
Cc: "ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net"
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-d
ce. Perhaps you should take up the challenge
?
As far as Windows is concerned you may be best of use host-sflowd. That is
what I use
http://blog.sflow.com/2010/10/installing-host-sflow-on-windows-server.html
Vladimir
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Im Root wrote:
> Hey this would be a great to ben
Hey this would be a great to benefit lots of users. Apparently the gmond
program goes into an indefinite CPU loop on this operating system. (Nobody
really cares if you make gmond run on zero/MQ pub sub anyways.) In fact this
would be of more benefit than writing a ganglia book or putting the cod
15 matches
Mail list logo
