Re: [Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X

2008-04-07 Thread Bernard Li
If someone can create a backport patch for the 3.0.x tree and update it in bugzilla, I would gladly test it: http://bugzilla.ganglia.info/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76 Thanks, Bernard On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 2:14 PM, W

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X

2008-04-03 Thread Bernard Li
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Witham, Timothy D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Try r1206, worked for me. Yep, just tested r1207, and it works fine. Cheers, Bernard - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X

2008-04-03 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Carlo: On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the master gmetad with "scalable on"? I'm just using the default settings, so yes, scalable is on. > might be, when testing with the same setup with 3.0.7, the XML generated is > invalid but ap

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X

2008-04-03 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 03:55:51PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > the fix wasn't yet complete, but even though there is still some more > > refactoring needed for the sum_finished lock, I couldn't repro

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X

2008-04-02 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Carlo: On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the fix wasn't yet complete, but even though there is still some more > refactoring needed for the sum_finished lock, I couldn't reproduce this > problem anymore with r1154. > > testing it with

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X

2008-04-02 Thread Bernard Li
Martin: On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Witham, Timothy D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > r1170 passes my tests. Thanks! Now that the patch has been confirmed working in trunk, do you plan on backporting this to the 3.0.x branch? Thanks, Bernard

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X

2008-03-31 Thread Witham, Timothy D
: [Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 09:50:33AM -0700, Witham, Timothy D wrote: > > But unfortunately, r1142 reverts to giving incomplete sums in the > metrics, so bug#76 is back: the fix wasn't yet complete, but even though there is s

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X

2008-03-29 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 09:50:33AM -0700, Witham, Timothy D wrote: > > But unfortunately, r1142 reverts to giving incomplete sums in the > metrics, so bug#76 is back: the fix wasn't yet complete, but even though there is still some more refactoring needed for the sum_finished lock, I couldn't rep

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X

2008-03-28 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Timothy: On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Witham, Timothy D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But unfortunately, r1142 reverts to giving incomplete sums in the > metrics, so bug#76 is back: > > # perl -e 'while(1){print `netcat localhost 39003 | grep "cpu_num"`; }' > >SLOPE="zero" SOURCE="gm

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X

2008-03-28 Thread Witham, Timothy D
Hi Carlo, >> Looks like gmetad in trunk is broken. When I request summary >> information it segfaults: >the newer implementation from r1142 shouldn't segfault anymore. No seg fault for me on Linux and I agree that is a cleaner place to put the lock. I had considered that but thought it might l

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X

2008-03-28 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:58:53PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: > Hi guys: > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 08:07:49AM -0700, Witham, Timothy D wrote: > > > > > > If we remove the conditional the lock should

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X

2008-03-27 Thread Witham, Timothy D
Bernard Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 2:59 PM To: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon Cc: Witham, Timothy D; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net; Brad Nicholes; Martin Knoblauch Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X Hi guys: On Thu, Mar 27,

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X

2008-03-27 Thread Bernard Li
Hi guys: On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 08:07:49AM -0700, Witham, Timothy D wrote: > > > > If we remove the conditional the lock should silently fail and so we > > would get the same result. This would make the

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X

2008-03-27 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 08:07:49AM -0700, Witham, Timothy D wrote: > > If we remove the conditional the lock should silently fail and so we > would get the same result. This would make the code a bit simpler and > I'm OK with that. Committed revision 1138. > But it looks like the only way it ca

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X

2008-03-27 Thread Witham, Timothy D
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Nicholes Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 9:42 AM To: Martin Knoblauch; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X >>> On 3/27/2008 at 2:44 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X

2008-03-27 Thread Brad Nicholes
>>> On 3/27/2008 at 2:44 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > any objections to commit the attached patch for a longstanding gmetad > problem into 3.0.X? I already put it into trunk a few days ago. The fix was > developed by Timothy on

[Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X

2008-03-27 Thread Martin Knoblauch
Hi folks, any objections to commit the attached patch for a longstanding gmetad problem into 3.0.X? I already put it into trunk a few days ago. The fix was developed by Timothy on top of 3.0.6 and is in production use. Please vote. Cheers Martin