>>> On 5/6/2008 at 7:10 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 02:59:55PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>> >
>> > The SOURCE attribute in the XML
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 02:59:55PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> >
> > The SOURCE attribute in the XML is just there to make sure that an older
> Gmetad could read the newer XML.
>
> then IMHO it should be t
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 02:59:55PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>
> The SOURCE attribute in the XML is just there to make sure that an older
> Gmetad could read the newer XML.
then IMHO it should be treated as a backward compatibility feature in the
code until it can be removed, rather than being
>>> On 5/5/2008 at 8:27 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Brad
Nicholes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/4/2008 at 8:51 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
> Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The metrics generated with gmetric are being tagged in the XML as coming
>
>>> On 5/4/2008 at 8:51 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The metrics generated with gmetric are being tagged in the XML as coming from
> gmond instead.
>
I'll take a look at this but the real question is "do we care?". One of the
items
The metrics generated with gmetric are being tagged in the XML as coming from
gmond instead.
Carlo
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time
