RE: [Ganglia-developers] Licensing Question

2005-11-11 Thread Bernard Li
@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Licensing Question Can I check in about this issue again? I would really like to have Debian packages form the regular Debian package tree and currently they cannot add the Ganglia package because of these licensing issue's, even t

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Licensing Question

2005-11-11 Thread Ramon Bastiaans
Can I check in about this issue again? I would really like to have Debian packages form the regular Debian package tree and currently they cannot add the Ganglia package because of these licensing issue's, even though the maintainer has it ready to go. Now I keep on building them on my own by

RE: [Ganglia-developers] Licensing Question

2005-10-26 Thread Bernard Li
> No, that's the result of an incorrect default. I don't think > there is a > plan at this point. The GPL'd code in the linux support should take > less than a days work to replace if someone wants to do that. Well it looks like Brian here just volunteered himself! ;-) Joking aside, I think we

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Licensing Question

2005-10-26 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 06:42:01PM -0500, Brian Credeur wrote: > Hi All, > > I wanted to follow-up on a discussion thread back in mid-September on > licensing of 3.0.1. From that dicussion, there appears to be code from > a number of different licenses (BSD, GPL, LGPL, and Apache) and some > q