RE: [Ganglia-developers] Re: 2.6.0? 2.5.8? 3.0.0? (frustration...)

2005-01-10 Thread Bernard Li
Hey Matt and others: IRC would be cool, in fact there is already a #ganglia channel on freenode (though it's mostly for user-support). Cheers, Bernard > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Matt Massie > Sent: Monday, January 10, 200

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Re: 2.6.0? 2.5.8? 3.0.0? (frustration...)

2004-12-15 Thread Adeyemi Adesanya
Martin, I was under the impression that we were close to finalizing the new features/fixes for 2.5.8. Several of them have been floating around for a while and I really feel like the rug has been pulled from underneath me. Anyone who runs Ganglia on Solaris will know how I feel. When I realiz

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Re: 2.6.0? 2.5.8? 3.0.0? (frustration...)

2004-12-15 Thread Martin Knoblauch
Hi, personally I also was a bit surprised about the move into 2.6.0. I would have liked to see a 2.5.8 with the few remaining bug-fixes and Solaris using "kstat". No metrics rearrangements (we could have added Linux/cpu_wio at the end of the list) and no fancy new confugation options. Not sure wh

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Re: 2.6.0? 2.5.8? 3.0.0? (frustration...)

2004-12-14 Thread Josh Durham
Well, I personally think you should continue your development on the next major version. 2.5.x is pretty stable. If someone wants to maintain it, I would think Matt would be glad to let someone support 2.5. I feel that if you spend alot of time maintaining 2.5, or bouncing back between 2.5