Re: [Ganglia-developers] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Ganglia meetup Tue Oct 21 in San Francisco (Quantcast HQ)

2014-10-21 Thread Daniel Pocock
Just a reminder - this is tonight. Please register: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/ganglia-get-together-tickets-13774378537 so your name will be on the list given to the security man in the lobby. You will see the full address after inserting your details. There is a BALUG meeting around the

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Ganglia 3.1.2 testingtarball...

2009-02-17 Thread Brad Nicholes
>>> On 2/17/2009 at 8:29 AM, in message <499ad7bd.9000...@sara.nl>, Ramon >>> Bastiaans wrote: > Will a final 3.1.2 release be issued soon? > > I think the two week testing period has passed and 'no news is good > news'. ;) > Working on it. I hope to have it out today. I just need to do the

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Ganglia 3.1.2 testing tarball...

2009-02-17 Thread Ramon Bastiaans
Will a final 3.1.2 release be issued soon? I think the two week testing period has passed and 'no news is good news'. ;) - Ramon. Brad Nicholes wrote: > In an effort to continue improving the Ganglia software, the Ganglia Project > has released an official testing release of Ganglia 3.1.2. Th

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [ANNOUNCEMENT] UnOfficial pre-release of Ganglia 3.1.1

2008-08-19 Thread Bernard Li
Dear all: If you build RPMs from the tarball and try to upgrade, RPM will create /etc/ganglia/{gmetad,gmond}.conf.rpmsave. This is because there were modifications made to the configuration files from the previous version. For gmetad, the modifications are negligible, so you can keep your old co

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [ANNOUNCEMENT] UnOfficial pre-release of Ganglia 3.1.1

2008-08-18 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:46:33AM -0500, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: > > Some of the most visible changes I can come out with from the top of my head > and that we should be specially looking for regressions as compared with 3.1.0 > are: And of course I forgot one significant (not because

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Official release of Ganglia 3.1.0

2008-07-31 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:42:07PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: > > The protocol that allows gmond nodes to communicate within the same cluster, > has changed. However the XML packets that are passed between gmond and > gmetad have remained compatible from 3.0.x to 3.1.x, allowing a 3.0.x > gmetad

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Ganglia 3.1.0 tarball ready fortesting...

2008-07-29 Thread Brad Nicholes
It has been two weeks since the announcement of the availability of the Ganglia 3.1.0 testing tarball. Since that time, I haven't seen any reports of showstopper issues. Unless there are any objections or critical bug reports that have not yet been reported, I propose that we release the 3.1

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Ganglia 3.1.0 tarball readyfortesting...

2008-07-17 Thread Brad Nicholes
>>> On 7/17/2008 at 11:05 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 04:43:32PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon >> > >> > Other than that, as Brad said, the XML interface

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Ganglia 3.1.0 tarball ready fortesting...

2008-07-17 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 04:43:32PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon > > > > Other than that, as Brad said, the XML interface between gmetad/gmond has > > been kept backward compatible both ways and therefore it should work > > either way. > > I

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Ganglia 3.1.0 tarball ready fortesting...

2008-07-16 Thread Bernard Li
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One of the reasons why doing gmetad/frontend first might be better is that > since 3.0 the way external metrics (the ones generated with gmetric) is > managed in the frontend has changed. > > If you have gmetr

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Ganglia 3.1.0 tarball ready fortesting...

2008-07-16 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 09:39:48PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Carlo's email from 9 July suggested the opposite - upgrade gmetad first, > the new gmetad would then be able to receive XML from both 3.0 and 3.1 > gmond instances. > > Could someone confirm which (or possibly both) case is recom

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Ganglia 3.1.0 tarball ready fortesting...

2008-07-15 Thread Brad Nicholes
>>> On 7/15/2008 at 2:39 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED] , <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Please read all the README, INSTALL and other available >> documentation (http://ganglia.wiki.sourceforge.net) as a lot >> of things have changed since 3.0.7. Use good deployment >> practices when upgra

Re: [Ganglia-developers] announcement

2005-02-01 Thread Matt Massie
the consensus is that automatic == evil (i actually didn't receive one response in support of automatic conversion). the most likely solution will be that the rpm checks if you are upgrading from 2.5.x and if so will output a message telling you how to convert your configuration file (gmond --

RE: [Ganglia-developers] announcement

2005-02-01 Thread Bernard Li
Hey Matt: Looks good - were you planning on releasing a beta, or the real deal? Also, what have you decided about the RPM issue? What happens if a user has Ganglia 2.5.6 installed with /etc/gmond.conf and decides to do rpm -Uvh? Thanks, Bernard > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PRO

Re: [Ganglia-developers] announcement

2002-09-18 Thread Federico Sacerdoti
Proofreadin... 1. Capitalize first letter of bullet point sentences. 2. * new TN (time now) and TMAX (timeout) allow for per-metric... Should be: * new TN (time now) and TMAX (timeout) allow for per-metric live/stale determination. 3."the SLOPE attribute will also a

Re: [Ganglia-developers] announcement

2002-09-18 Thread Steven Wagner
Steven A. DuChene wrote: So I looked around on the ganglia project pages on sourceforge but failed to find any stuff labeled as 2.5.0 so I'm guessing this is a preliminary rough draft of the planned announcement, correct? Also I checked out of cvs the current ganglia, monitor-core, and monitor-d

Re: [Ganglia-developers] announcement

2002-09-18 Thread Steven Wagner
proofreadin'... matt massie wrote: o the ganglia meta daemon (gmond) is now written in C and part of the monitoring core distribution and: i thought the ganglia meta daemon was "gmetad" :P o ganglia has been ported to even more platforms: Linux (i386, ia64, sparc, alpha, powerpc, m

Re: [Ganglia-developers] announcement

2002-09-17 Thread Steven A. DuChene
So I looked around on the ganglia project pages on sourceforge but failed to find any stuff labeled as 2.5.0 so I'm guessing this is a preliminary rough draft of the planned announcement, correct? Also I checked out of cvs the current ganglia, monitor-core, and monitor-docs modules but after tryin