On 03/03/14 21:27, Vladimir Vuksan wrote:
> Let's stick with 1.10.2.
Done
Sources are in a directory called contrib now, it is copied into the
ganglia-web dist tarball too
--
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Sub
Let's stick with 1.10.2.
Vladimir
On 03/03/2014 03:13 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> On 03/03/14 21:08, Vladimir Vuksan wrote:
>> That would be fine with me if that is what it takes. Include the full
>> blown Jquery UI.
> I see there is 1.10.2 right now
>
> Can I just swap from the custom.min.js fi
On 03/03/14 21:08, Vladimir Vuksan wrote:
> That would be fine with me if that is what it takes. Include the full
> blown Jquery UI.
I see there is 1.10.2 right now
Can I just swap from the custom.min.js file to the full min.js file?
Or do you want to try the latest, 1.10.4, before releasing w
That would be fine with me if that is what it takes. Include the full
blown Jquery UI.
Thanks,
Vladimir
On 03/03/2014 01:25 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> On 04/02/14 14:56, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> On 04/02/14 14:47, Chris Burroughs wrote:
>>> I thought the distro anti-bundling stance was paired
On 04/02/14 14:56, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On 04/02/14 14:47, Chris Burroughs wrote:
>> I thought the distro anti-bundling stance was paired with a "we
>> already have X so you should just depend on it". I'm not sure how
>> this works with javascript. Is there some debian "jquery package"
>> th
On 04/02/14 14:47, Chris Burroughs wrote:
> I thought the distro anti-bundling stance was paired with a "we
> already have X so you should just depend on it". I'm not sure how
> this works with javascript. Is there some debian "jquery package"
> that could be depended on?
There is a jQuery pack
I thought the distro anti-bundling stance was paired with a "we already
have X so you should just depend on it". I'm not sure how this works
with javascript. Is there some debian "jquery package" that could be
depended on?
On 01/31/2014 04:23 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> Debian is proposing
On 31/01/14 16:10, Vladimir Vuksan wrote:
> What I was suggesting is to add dynamic download automatically. Can't
> bootstrap pull external files ?
That depends
If you want to run a bootstrap script that creates a release tarball and
uploads it to some download page, then the script can pull ext
What I was suggesting is to add dynamic download automatically. Can't
bootstrap pull external files ?
On 01/31/2014 10:06 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Another thing to consider is to have the packager download problematic
> JS files and download them directly of jquery.com. Daniel can that be
> don
On 31/01/14 16:01, Vladimir Vuksan wrote:
> I would go with option a). I am fine with this approach.
OK, I'll sort it out over the next few days
>
> Another thing to consider is to have the packager download problematic
> JS files and download them directly of jquery.com. Daniel can that be
> don
10 matches
Mail list logo
