Re: [Ganglia-general] Anyone experience petabyte peaks in network metric in ganglia 3.x.y ?

2008-09-10 Thread Martin Knoblauch
- Original Message From: Witham, Timothy D [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Escobio, Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ganglia-general@lists.sourceforge.net ganglia-general@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2008 9:42:34 PM Subject: Re: [Ganglia-general] Anyone experience petabyte

Re: [Ganglia-general] Anyone experience petabyte peaks in network metric in ganglia 3.x.y ?

2008-09-10 Thread Escobio, Roger
-Original Message- From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 10, 2008 6:55 AM To: Witham, Timothy D; Escobio, Roger [CMB-IT]; ganglia-general@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Ganglia-general] Anyone experience petabyte peaks in network metric in ganglia

Re: [Ganglia-general] Anyone experience petabyte peaks in network metric in ganglia 3.x.y ?

2008-09-10 Thread Martin Knoblauch
-- Martin Knoblauch email: k n o b i AT knobisoft DOT de www: http://www.knobisoft.de - Original Message From: Escobio, Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ganglia-general@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Re: [Ganglia-general] Anyone experience petabyte peaks in network metric in ganglia 3.x.y ?

2008-09-10 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Roger: On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Martin Knoblauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I created a patch again linux/metrics.c (3.1.1 version) to add the counterdiff function found in *bsd/metrics.c Are you interested in it? Just let me know and I'll send it to the list Yes please. I am

Re: [Ganglia-general] Anyone experience petabyte peaks in network metric in ganglia 3.x.y ?

2008-09-10 Thread Escobio, Roger
-Original Message- From: Bernard Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 10, 2008 3:05 PM To: Escobio, Roger [CMB-IT] Cc: ganglia-general@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Ganglia-general] Anyone experience petabyte peaks in network metric in ganglia 3.x.y ? Hi Roger:

Re: [Ganglia-general] cpu load percentages instead of 100m?

2008-09-10 Thread Witham, Timothy D
System load doesn't make sense as a percentage, as it is not a portion of a whole, so there's no objective 100% to scale for. Although in the patch in BUG#206, I have added percentage load and percentage running processes to the graph legend because I think they are rather useful. The 100%

Re: [Ganglia-general] gmetric -t types question

2008-09-10 Thread Klaus Steden
Hello Craig, Œint¹ types include a sign bit ... hence the availability of the Œuint¹ types, which are unsigned. Also ‹ what¹s Œ­0¹? cheers, Klaus On 9/10/08 2:13 PM, Craig Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED]did etch on stone tablets: Wouldn't that be: int8 = -0 to 128 and not: int8 = -128

Re: [Ganglia-general] gmetric -t types question

2008-09-10 Thread Klaus Steden
Also, technically, Œint8¹ ranges from ­127 to 127, not ­128, which requires 9 bits to store. cheers, Klaus On 9/10/08 3:39 PM, Klaus Steden [EMAIL PROTECTED]did etch on stone tablets: Hello Craig, Œint¹ types include a sign bit ... hence the availability of the Œuint¹ types, which are

Re: [Ganglia-general] Need help troubleshooting gmond issue

2008-09-10 Thread Lieting Yu
I do see the gmond is still bound to the multicast ip by looking at both 'netstat -gn' and 'lsof -p pid'. I am running Solaris 10 on x86. The truss report shows the following: (file handle 7 is a UDP connect bound to port 41366 and 9 seems to be incoming connection from gmetad, 6 is the tcp