On 13 August 2007 22:16, David Orchard wrote:
Hi,
Some base classes (specifically thread base classes) would benefit from
being able to execute a function after the object is constructed and before
it is destructed. For a thread class the thread can't start until after the
object is
Summary
---
We entered Stage 2 on July 6th. I plan to put us into Stage 3 on
September 10th. At that point, we will accept only bug-fixes -- no
more new features until Stage 1 for GCC 4.4.
Are there any folks out there who have projects for Stage 1 or Stage 2
that they are
Hello,
Don't ask me why I did this but.
I would like to report that the version of gcc 2.95, available at
ftp://ftp2.sco.com/pub/skunkware/osr5/devtools/gcc/
designed for SCO osr5 will install on SCO osr6 and it works to the
extent I have tested it.
I compiled and installed joe source
This is one of the last pieces in the jigsaw for gcj on ARM.
Unwind_Backtrace is not defined in the ARM exception handling spec at
http://www.arm.com/pdfs/ehabi.pdf, but it can be implemented by
performing Phase 1 of a forced unwind, calling the trace function as
we go. This works for gcj, which
The FSF has asked us to not directly support any ports to SCO.
See http://www.fsf.org/licensing/sco/
That request has not yet been rescinded.
On 14 August 2007 15:54, DJ Delorie wrote:
The FSF has asked us to not directly support any ports to SCO.
See http://www.fsf.org/licensing/sco/
That request has not yet been rescinded.
But consider also
http://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk/README.SCO
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 03:31:58PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
This is one of the last pieces in the jigsaw for gcj on ARM.
Unwind_Backtrace is not defined in the ARM exception handling spec at
http://www.arm.com/pdfs/ehabi.pdf, but it can be implemented by
performing Phase 1 of a forced
Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 03:31:58PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
This is one of the last pieces in the jigsaw for gcj on ARM.
Unwind_Backtrace is not defined in the ARM exception handling spec at
http://www.arm.com/pdfs/ehabi.pdf, but it can be implemented by
Hi,
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Recently I have tried to run Spec2000 fortran benchmarks with
-fwhole-program and -combine flags. It looks like there was no effect
of really combining files into one program, i.e. they are processed
separately at ipa level.
I wonder
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 10:26:57AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
Is there a particular reason for x86 and x86-64 global-dynamic TLS
model to require @PLT when calling __tls_get_addr when PIC isn't
required? See
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4918
Right now, gcc doesn't
Jan Hubicka wrote:
One thing I would like to see in is the sharing checker. The criteria
of bootstrap/regtesting on primary platforms is almost met now with
exception of regmove pass that I sent patch for some time ago.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01441.html
I will do
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 05:25:54PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
At Cygnus, in the early and mid- 90s, we did this routinely, starting
with the native compilers shipped with various Unix variants. As Unix
variants generally no longer come with a free (as in beer) compiler
other than gcc,
Diego == Diego Novillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
are gimplify.c for all the conversion to GIMPLE, tree-cfg.c for the
building of the CFG and omp-low.c for the conversion into Low
GIMPLE.
Actually, gimple-low.c. omp-low.c is only for the OpenMP lowering.
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Index: fixincludes/configure.ac
===
--- fixincludes/configure.ac (revision 127373)
+++ fixincludes/configure.ac (working copy)
@@ -5,6 +5,15 @@
AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR(..)
Dave == Dave Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 13 August 2007 22:16, David Orchard wrote:
Some base classes (specifically thread base classes) would benefit from
being able to execute a function after the object is constructed and before
it is destructed. For a thread class the thread can't
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 05:25:54PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
At Cygnus, in the early and mid- 90s, we did this routinely, starting
with the native compilers shipped with various Unix variants. As Unix
variants generally no longer come with a free (as in beer) compiler
other than gcc,
--- Comment #3 from fpbeekhof at gmail dot com 2007-08-14 08:11 ---
Subject: Re: std::tr1::tgamma produces wrong results [for
(x-1) in stead of for x]
OOPS!
Thank you! And sorry for wasting your time...
pcarlini at suse dot de wrote:
--- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 08:40 ---
Subject: Bug 19037
Author: charlet
Date: Tue Aug 14 08:40:11 2007
New Revision: 127422
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=127422
Log:
2007-08-14 Olivier Hainque [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #5 from belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru 2007-08-14
08:44 ---
gfortran.dg/bound_2.f90 and gfortran.dg/common_resize_1.f trigger this ICE with
-O --param avg-aliased-vops=100
--
belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #6 from belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru 2007-08-14
08:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=14057)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14057action=view)
reduced a bit from bound_2.f90
Correction, you actually need -O --param
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 09:04
---
write(6,*) (/(s1(),i=1,3,-1)/)
!write(6,*) shape((/(s1(),i=1,3,-1)/))
contains
function s1()
character(len=1) :: s1
s1=
end function s1
end
Further reduced: no need for the substring in s1. You
--- Comment #5 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 09:20 ---
Closing as per latest changes.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 09:25 ---
Subject: Bug 30428
Author: pinskia
Date: Tue Aug 14 09:24:26 2007
New Revision: 127477
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=127477
Log:
2007-08-14 Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 09:25 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-08-14 10:04 ---
Apparently this is fixed in mainline.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 12:44
---
Subject: Bug 32594
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Tue Aug 14 12:44:19 2007
New Revision: 127478
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=127478
Log:
PR fortran/32594
* trans-expr.c
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 12:47
---
Fixed.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 13:42
---
(In reply to comment #3)
One needs therefore to replace the current code by something which calls the
library.
This was done, and the current error message was corrected.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33054
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33039
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33038
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32987
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32977
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32962
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32955
--- Comment #8 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 14:08 ---
I don't think there's anything useful we can do with it without a testcase,
unfortunately.
--
drow at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 14:10
---
Reduced testcase:
subroutine print_sub(l, labels)
logical :: l
character (len=*), optional :: labels(1)
if (l) call foo
if (present(labels)) then
print *, labels(1)
end if
end
The logical and
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 14:28
---
I'll try to deal with that one, it looks nasty (although target-specific).
Thanks for the bug-report.
1. Can you report what HP-PA architecture this is happening on? And the OS?
(I have access to HP testdrive,
--- Comment #10 from rask at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 14:39 ---
Subject: Bug 30315
Author: rask
Date: Tue Aug 14 14:39:24 2007
New Revision: 127481
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=127481
Log:
PR target/30315
* config/i386/i386.h
--- Comment #3 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2007-08-14
14:48 ---
I have an HP MODEL 9000/778/B180L. It uses a PA-RISC 1.1 processor. The OS is
Debian Linux 3.1.
I will try your patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33062
With current (today) trunk, building on x86-32bit host with
--enable-targets=all fails as follows. Just building 32bit (i.e. without
--enable-targets=all) works.
Host system is Debian (etch). Configure options are:
gcc/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc/head --enable-shared --with-system-zlib
Error (I think) during generation of GCC 4.2.1:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
/bin/sh: line 9: cd: stage3-gcc: No such file or directory
Comparison successful.
gcc -v output:
Target: i686-pc-cygwin
Configured with: ./configure --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld
--enable-languages=c,c++,ada
--- Comment #1 from mbo dot massimo at tiscali dot it 2007-08-14 15:20
---
Created an attachment (id=14058)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14058action=view)
build log
the included file contains the log of the make process
--
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 15:26
---
(In reply to comment #7)
I suspect that 'anonymous' is labels.0 (though it *has* a name!)
Well, that was wrong. If you look at the gimple tree (004t.gimple), it contains
the following:
print_sub (l, labels,
R430 derived-type-stmt is TYPE [ [ , type-attr-spec-list ] :: ] type-name
[ ( type-param-name-list ) ]
Thus the :: is mandatory, however, gfortran does not give any diagnostic with
-std=f2003.
Expected: As with type, private :: t or type, private, bind(c) t give a
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 15:48 ---
Note: Instead of having the SEQUENCE property, the BIND(C) attribute (type,
bind(c) :: t) suffices as well.
Two data entities have the same type if they are declared with reference to
the same derived-type
--- Comment #4 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 16:02 ---
I encountered this as a build failure for powerpc-eabispe in libstdc++-v3.
--
drow at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-08-14 16:03 ---
isinfd32/isinfd64/isinfd128 are supposed to standard DFP functions.
They have the same names, independent of encodings.
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2007-08-14
16:07 ---
Your patch fixed my test cases.
I do not have testresults on my HP workstation. I will try to find a copy of
gfortran.dg/logical_3.f90 and test it.
--
--- Comment #5 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2007-08-14
16:16 ---
gfortran.dg/logical_3.f90 compiles without error
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33062
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 16:36 ---
This fixes it but there are one or two regressions that I need to investigate.
Paul
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
===
*** gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 16:44 ---
This fixes the problem. However there are some odd regressions that do not
seem to have anything to do with it but which must be investigated.
Paul
Index: gcc/fortran/expr.c
Consider:
struct T {} t;
bool b = 1.1 t;
The code is invalid, but GCC's error message is peculiar:
error: no match for 'operator' in
'1.100088817841970012523233890533447265625e+0 t'
The long decimal expansion makes for a messy error that suggests the user typed
something he
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 17:01 ---
What happens if you don't build in the source directory?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33065
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 17:02 ---
Well 1.1 is not directly represented in double precission which is why you get
that weird number.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33067
--- Comment #2 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2007-08-14
17:19 ---
I know that, but that's irrelevant from a user interface perspective. The fact
remains that the error message is needlessly messy and would be far clearer and
less surprising to the user if it said 1.1
When individual bit field members of a struct/class are declared as volatile,
the generated code may not treat them as volatile (code varies with -O and
-mprocessor choices). Non-bit field volatile members and bit field members of
volatile structs are always treated as volatile. The problem can be
--- Comment #1 from Steve at Zook dot com 2007-08-14 17:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=14059)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14059action=view)
Test C or C++ code fragment
For bad code compile: m68k-elf-gcc -c -save-temps -x c++ test.c
or: m68k-elf-g++ -c
Function count_occurrences in rtlanal.c checks equalty of 2 rtx expressions by
comparing them instead of using rtx_equal_p:
if (x == find)
return 1;
should be:
if (rtx_equal_p (x, find))
return 1;
--
Summary: equalty of 2 rtx's are not checked with rtx_equal_p in
--- Comment #6 from jigorou3 at mail dot goo dot ne dot jp 2007-08-14
17:46 ---
It looks like
zlib compiled w/ -O -msse -ftree-vectorize (built with fedora's rpm package
gcc-4.1.2-17)
has same problem.
In my environment, rpm-4.4.2.1-7.fc8 and seamonkey-1.1.3-6.fc8 segfault like
--- Comment #3 from mbo dot massimo at tiscali dot it 2007-08-14 17:46
---
I don't know how to build in different directory.
Can you say me what I will do?
I did make command in the directory where I untared gcc
(/home/compiler/build/gcc/gcc-4.2.1)
--
--- Comment #12 from sje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 18:12 ---
Subject: Bug 32941
Author: sje
Date: Tue Aug 14 18:12:34 2007
New Revision: 127487
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=127487
Log:
PR tree-optimization/32941
* tree-eh.c (struct
While trying to build gcc 3.4.3 on a RHEL5/i386 system in a chroot we see
Comparing stage2 and stage3 of the compiler
gmake[1]: Entering directory `/opt/build/gcc-3.4.3-objdir3/gcc'
[...]
Bootstrap comparison failure!
./alloc-pool.o differs
./bb-reorder.o differs
./bt-load.o differs
[...]
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.1.2 (Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu4) (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Assert_Failure
sinfo.adb:351|
| Error detected at status_bar.ads:14:3|
| Please submit a bug report; see
--- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-08-14 19:25 ---
The issue in Comment #3 has long been fixed.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 20:17 ---
PR32824 discusses a similar issue.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25621
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org
--- Comment #3 from seppo at totalviewtech dot com 2007-08-14 20:32 ---
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the quick response. The static variable foofoo seems to be OK in
DWARF and the DW_AT_location is there. But for some reason I still do not see
the _non-static_ iii variable and its
--- Comment #4 from mbo dot massimo at tiscali dot it 2007-08-14 20:37
---
ok I will try to generate gcc in a different build directory.
I read the gcc documentation a now known how to do.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33065
--- Comment #5 from dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 20:47 ---
Additional testcases:
(1) see loop in lines 23 and 32 in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2007-08/msg00171.html
(2)
SUBROUTINE SUSCEP(L,Iz)
IMPLICIT NONE
INTEGER L , Iz(L,L) , iznum, ix, iy
Expected: An error that the user operator .sub. does not exist.
Actually: Compiles.
NAG f95:
Error: foo.f90, line 9: Cannot find symbol .SUB. in module A
module a
implicit none
contains
subroutine sub()
end subroutine sub
end module a
program test
use a, only: operator(.sub.)
end program
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 21:14
---
(In reply to comment #4)
Your patch fixed my test cases.
I do not have testresults on my HP workstation. I will try to find a copy of
gfortran.dg/logical_3.f90 and test it.
OK, so I'm CCing the hppa
subroutine PropagateGrid(wavl,grid,field)
parameter (KR=8); implicit real(KR) (a-h,o-z)
intent(in) wavl; intent(inout) grid; dimension grid(0:3,0:3)
complex(KR),intent(inout) :: field(*)
call PropagateField(wavl,nint(grid(0,1:)),field) !causes ICE
!call
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 21:16 ---
(From update of attachment 13369)
strcpy (new-local_name, name);
This does not make much sense for INTERFACE_INTRINSIC_OP.
The problem with being able to import an operator only once is related to PR
33072:
--- Comment #3 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 21:22
---
Created an attachment (id=14060)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14060action=view)
preprocessed source
Added preprocessed source.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33029
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 21:24 ---
Extended example (rejects-valid + accepts-invalid):
(Overlaps partially with PR31298)
module a
implicit none
interface operator(.op.)
module procedure sub
end interface
contains
function sub(i)
integer ::
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 21:33
---
Confirmed on x86_64-linux with -m32:
$ cat a.f90
real x(1)
call foo(nint(x))
end
$ gfortran a.f90 -m32
a.f90: In function MAIN__:
a.f90:1: internal compiler error: in gfc_add_modify, at
--- Comment #4 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 21:34 ---
r127273 is this patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2007-08/msg00165.html
My initial reaction was, What happens to the REG_RETVAL note, if the insn with
the REG_LIBCALL note? I don't know what happens with the
--- Comment #1 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 21:40 ---
No, the pointer comparison here is correct. Using rtx_equal_p here would result
in finding non-shared address rtx'en as false positives.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.3.0
Known to work||4.2.1 4.1.3
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 22:07 ---
Subject: Bug 27211
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Aug 14 22:07:31 2007
New Revision: 127492
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=127492
Log:
/cp
2007-08-14 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 22:14 ---
Subject: Bug 27211
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Aug 14 22:13:45 2007
New Revision: 127493
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=127493
Log:
/cp
2007-08-14 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #9 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-08-14 22:16 ---
Fixed.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-08-14 22:29 ---
Yes, I can confirm this. The issue seems simple: at that line we are wrongly
calling TYPE_CONTEXT on a FUNCTION_DECL. In such circumstances the solution
normally adopted elsewhere is that in the draft, which in fact appear
--- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-08-14 22:32 ---
For some reason, I can't attach the patch, here it is, anyway:
Index: pt.c
===
*** pt.c(revision 127493)
--- pt.c(working copy)
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
The following testcase ICEs on x64_64-linux with -m32 -O:
$ cat u.f90
subroutine scaleg(a, w)
real a(1), w(1)
a(1) = 2.0**int(w(1))
end
$ gfortran -m32 -c u.f90 -O1
u.f90: In function scaleg:
u.f90:3: internal compiler error: in copy_insn_1, at emit-rtl.c:4925
The regression happened
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 22:40
---
Subject: Bug 33073
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Tue Aug 14 22:40:00 2007
New Revision: 127494
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=127494
Log:
PR fortran/33073
* trans-intrinsic.c
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 22:40 ---
The iii bug is PR 27574.
So one problem was fixed for 4.1.0 and the other problem is already recorded as
a different PR number so I am going to close this as fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 22:43
---
Fixed, thanks for the bug report!
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 23:02
---
Anyone calling DATE_AND_TIME without arguments probably actually *wants* to
have a no-op in their code, so I'd even be against fixing it ;-)
Well, Daniel, we have so many bugs to work on that I'll close this as
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19292
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 23:26
---
Subject: Bug 33066
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Tue Aug 14 23:26:23 2007
New Revision: 127497
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=127497
Log:
PR fortran/33066
* decl.c
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 23:28
---
Fixed.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #10 from samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot org 2007-08-14
23:30 ---
This should have been fixed by svn commit 127290
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5212
On GCC-3.4.5 for mingw with Dwarf2-EH
Configured with: ../gcc-3.4.5/configure --with-gcc --with-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as
--host=mingw32 --target=mingw32 --prefix=/mingw --enable-threads --disable-nls
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,f77 --disable-win32-registry --disable-shared
--disable-sjlj-exceptions
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
