Hello All, Steering Committee,
Can someone please review the patch and suggest if this OK for 4.3 branch?
Regards,
Pompa
Pompapathi V Gadad wrote:
Hello All,
Refer: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg00306.html
I had submitted a patch to undeprecate CRX port in 4.3 branch. The
port i
Folks, I need to freeze the branch for a few hours. The overnight
tester returned many new failures that I need to analyze. Please
refrain from checking in anything until I unfreeze the branch.
Diego.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 08:48:12AM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Folks, I need to freeze the branch for a few hours. The overnight
> tester returned many new failures that I need to analyze. Please
> refrain from checking in anything until I unfreeze the branch.
Grrr. I hope it wasn't me. I di
> Grrr. I hope it wasn't me. I didn't enable any new code paths that
> weren't already gcc_unreachable(). Besides, my tests returned a couple
> hundred less failures. If for some reason it was me, we can disable
> execute_{expand,lower}_omp again.
Looks like 133658 broke the build:
../../
Hello,
This testcase seems to be broken, because it will fail everytime for the
static variable x. gcc detects, that this static variable has no reference
and will produce a warning.
Is this done by intention, or is it a failure in testcase to set variable
'static'?
Cheers,
i.A. Kai Tietz
|
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 09:32, Rafael Espindola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ../../tuples2/gcc/omp-low.c:3341: warning: 'v_main' is used
> uninitialized in this function
> ../../tuples2/gcc/omp-low.c:3342: warning: 'v_back' is used
> uninitialized in this function
Yes. That was probably caus
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:35, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 09:32, Rafael Espindola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ../../tuples2/gcc/omp-low.c:3341: warning: 'v_main' is used
> > uninitialized in this function
> > ../../tuples2/gcc/omp-low.c:3342: warni
I got a new breakage after updating to rev 133687 5 minutes ago. :-(
gcc -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition
-Wmissing-format-attribute -Werror -Wno-return-type -fno-common
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../gcc/gcc -I../../
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 13:30, Doug Kwan (關振紱) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got a new breakage after updating to rev 133687 5 minutes ago. :-(
Yeah, you're probably using a different host GCC than I am.
Unfortunately, we'll have to live with this until bootstrap starts
working. Adding an initia
Done. Fix commited to 133690. I am using the gcc 4.0.3 configure for
i486-linux-gnu.
-Doug
2008/3/28 Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 13:30, Doug Kwan (關振德) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I got a new breakage after updating to rev 133687 5 minutes ago. :-(
>
> Yeah,
Hi,
I combined the current gcc and binutils mainlines into a combined
gcc + binutils source tree. When I tried to bootstrap it on
Linux/ia32 and Linux/Intel64 with shared library enabled, it went
to infinit loop when as or ld from stage 2 was used. The problem is
ld-new tries to use itself to reli
Hello H.J.,
* H.J. Lu wrote on Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:22:14PM CET:
>
> I combined the current gcc and binutils mainlines into a combined
> gcc + binutils source tree. When I tried to bootstrap it on
> Linux/ia32 and Linux/Intel64 with shared library enabled, it went
> to infinit loop when as or
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello H.J.,
>
> * H.J. Lu wrote on Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:22:14PM CET:
>
> >
> > I combined the current gcc and binutils mainlines into a combined
> > gcc + binutils source tree. When I tried to bootstrap it on
> > L
Still waiting on this...
-benjamin
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 12:45 +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 08:56 +0100, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > > Is there a replacement for it?
> >
> > You can configure manually a self made run-time by setting flags
> > (e.g. Configurable_Run_Time and Suppress_Standard_Library) in system
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20080328 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20080328/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
I was wondering anyone knows any details of the gcc port for Solaris/x86.
I am wondering, if I have an executable compiled with gcc for Linux and an
executable compiled with the same gcc (same version, same options) for
Solaris, how similar would those executables be? I understand that the
code
On Saturday 29 March 2008 00:56, Alexandra (Sasha) Fedorova wrote:
> I was wondering anyone knows any details of the gcc port for Solaris/x86.
> I am wondering, if I have an executable compiled with gcc for Linux and an
> executable compiled with the same gcc (same version, same options) for
> S
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 04:56:52PM -0700, Alexandra (Sasha) Fedorova wrote:
> I was wondering anyone knows any details of the gcc port for Solaris/x86.
> I am wondering, if I have an executable compiled with gcc for Linux and an
> executable compiled with the same gcc (same version, same options)
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Denys Vlasenko
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29950
And I can tell you now that bug is on purpose and really not a bug.
We base stuff on the decl uid and not memory address so we try for the
same code on differen
On Saturday 29 March 2008 01:46, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Denys Vlasenko
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > See:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29950
>
> And I can tell you now that bug is on purpose and really not a bug.
> We base stuff on the d
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Denys Vlasenko
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In this case I used it as an example why expecting gcc
> (and probably any other compiler) to generate
> ideantical assembly from same source on different OS
> is unrealistic.
You can generate identical assembly from
E-gold founder, Douglas Jackson, 51, of Sheridan, Mont., was 4 times shot
and killed Friday night on the Seventh Street ramp at East Seventh Avenue by
off-duty County Deputy Daniel Montana Jr.,
police said.
A spokesman for the Jackson's family told Fox 31 that the autopsy
details show the shots c
Hello, here's my application. Please, leave your comments as I still
have two days to fix it if something is wrong :)
Project
I want to make some improvements in the Lexer/cpplib area:
1) Change the way of file handling
-- Mmap file into memory if possible instead of allocating a buffer
(if no c
Hello all,
For a port that i am working on has this particular addressing mode
load Rd, Ra[offset]
store Rs, Ra[offset]
For the above two instructions base register Ra should be an even
register. This i have implemented using the macros REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P
and BASE_REG_CLASS by creating a class
25 matches
Mail list logo
