Re: gcc wiki project

2015-03-24 Thread Yury Gribov
On 03/24/2015 03:20 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 06:14:30PM -0500, David Kunsman wrote: Hello, I was just reading through the current projects wiki page and I noticed how out of date pretty much all of them are. So I was planning on doing "spring cleaning" by going down th

Bug with compound literal initializer?

2015-03-24 Thread Alexey Neyman
Hi, I am seeing a strange behavior when a compound initializer is used in a structure initialization. A test case: [[[ struct s { int y; unsigned long *x; }; struct s foo = { .y = 25, .x = (unsigned long [SZ]){}, }; ]]] If SZ is defined to non-zero, the expected output is pro

Re: gcc wiki project

2015-03-24 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 24 March 2015 at 12:33, Martin Jambor wrote: > This is exactly what I actually had in mind. Ah gotcha - then that's two voices in favour :-) I think as long as you don't actually rename pages then the wiki preserves quite good history, so we will always be able to go back to look at past versi

Re: gcc wiki project

2015-03-24 Thread Martin Jambor
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:20:46PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 06:14:30PM -0500, David Kunsman wrote: > >> Hello, I was just reading through the current projects wiki page and I > >> noticed how out of date pretty much all of them are. So I was > >> planning on doing

Re: gcc wiki project

2015-03-24 Thread Jonathan Wakely
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 06:14:30PM -0500, David Kunsman wrote: >> Hello, I was just reading through the current projects wiki page and I >> noticed how out of date pretty much all of them are. So I was >> planning on doing "spring cleaning" by going down the list tracking >> down what has been a

Re: gcc wiki project

2015-03-24 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 06:14:30PM -0500, David Kunsman wrote: > Hello, I was just reading through the current projects wiki page and I > noticed how out of date pretty much all of them are. So I was > planning on doing "spring cleaning" by going down the list tracking > down what has been an

Zs

2015-03-24 Thread Richard Allen
sent from my I Phonek

Re: [RFC] Dealing with ODR violations in GCC

2015-03-24 Thread Martin Liška
On 02/13/2015 07:54 PM, Martin Liška wrote: On 01/15/2015 06:47 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: Hello. I've just finished successfully chromium LTO build and there's list of mainly -Wodr warnings. I think some of them are false positives? What of those you consider to be false? I wonder if we can pri