Re: Automatically generated ChangeLog files - script

2020-06-22 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 26, 2020, Martin Liška wrote: > On 5/26/20 12:15 PM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote: >>>     * contracts.adb, einfo.adb, exp_ch9.adb, sem_ch12.adb, > It's not supported right now and it will make the filename parsing > much more complicated. Another colleague recently run into a problem

await your feedback

2020-06-22 Thread Gladys Kofi via Gcc

Re: [OMPD] API version formatting

2020-06-22 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 01:26:59PM -0400, y2s1982 . via Gcc wrote: > I have a question on API version formatting. > I have been looking at the get_api_version() and get_api_version_string() > documentation: > https://www.openmp.org/spec-html/5.0/openmpsu213.html#x269-17920005.5.1.2 > I also saw how

Re: [OMPD] API version formatting

2020-06-22 Thread Jeffrey Walton via Gcc
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 1:47 PM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 01:26:59PM -0400, y2s1982 . via Gcc wrote: > > I have a question on API version formatting. > > I have been looking at the get_api_version() and get_api_version_string() > > documentation: > > https://www.open

Re: [OMPD] API version formatting

2020-06-22 Thread y2s1982 . via Gcc
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 1:54 PM Jeffrey Walton via Gcc wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 1:47 PM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 01:26:59PM -0400, y2s1982 . via Gcc wrote: > > > I have a question on API version formatting. > > > I have been looking at the get_api_ve

Re: [OMPD] API version formatting

2020-06-22 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 03:14:44PM -0400, y2s1982 . via Gcc wrote: > > > If the 4 separate bytes of the version isn't something written somewhere > > in > > > the standard, I'd use something along the lines of > > > #define GCC_VERSION (__GNUC__ * 1000 + __GNUC_MINOR__) > > > macro, so make it > >

WWDC thread: support for darwin/macOS going forward

2020-06-22 Thread Eric Gallager via Gcc
Hi, at Apple's WWDC this year they have announced that they are doing yet another architecture transition, so I was wondering what exactly would be the best way to go about adding support for it? The first issue would be just what to call the new architecture; it seems to be ARM-based, but there mi

Re: WWDC thread: support for darwin/macOS going forward

2020-06-22 Thread Dmitry Mikushin
Homebrew has GCC 9, which offers flawless development experience, at least up to quite advanced applications. There of course could be corner cases in ABI, exceptions handling, etc., which I however never came across myself on MacOS. Thus, discussing gcc 4.2 seems to be highly nonsensical these day

Re: WWDC thread: support for darwin/macOS going forward

2020-06-22 Thread Iain Sandoe via Gcc
Hey Eric, Eric Gallager via Gcc wrote: Hi, at Apple's WWDC this year they have announced that they are doing yet another architecture transition, so I was wondering what exactly would be the best way to go about adding support for it? The first issue would be just what to call the new architec