Am 05.12.2020 um 14:25 schrieb Eric Botcazou:
> can someone explain to me why the -O2 optimizer is not able(allowed) to
> reduce this small sample the same way as clang/msvc?
Change the name of the function to something else than "main".
that works, thanks!
Am 05.12.2020 um 13:04 schrieb Jan Hubicka:
> gcc does not reduce to call result if called function is not static in
> -O2 (will do with -O2)
> clang and msvc does it also in -O2 regardless of the function beeing
> static or not
>
> can someone explain to me why the -O2 optimizer is not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98159
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98159
Bug ID: 98159
Summary: Compiler generates infinite loop
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
We'll try to canonicalize the arch string for --with-arch,
and the script is written in python, however it will turns out
GCC require python to build for RISC-V port, it's not expect as
the GCC requirement.
So this patch is made this as optional, detect python and only use it
when it available,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97969
Haoxin Tu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haoxintu at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98152
Andreas Schwab has created a bug entry for this issue,
using awk or shell should be fine to get the same functionality, but
it might take some time,
so I plan to add some checking to detect python, python2 or python3,
and skip this step if none
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98152
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96391
--- Comment #8 from Michael Cronenworth ---
(In reply to Jan Smets from comment #5)
> Similar issue @ https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96935
I applied the patch from that bug but it did not fix this issue.
Anything I can do to help
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98158
Bug ID: 98158
Summary: Gcc generates warning about its own generated move
assignment operator
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98157
Bug ID: 98157
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation, gcc 10.2,
-std=gnu++2a
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Snapshot gcc-10-20201205 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10-20201205/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 10 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98139
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97645
--- Comment #2 from Lénárd Szolnoki ---
(In reply to Lénárd Szolnoki from comment #0)
> This was possibly impossible prior to C++20 to subscript an array of unknown
> bound in constexpr context. As of P0388 conversion from T[N] to T[] can
>
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 06:01:59PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Dec 5, 2020, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
> > ../../../../libffi/src/aarch64/ffi.c: In function 'ffi_prep_closure_loc':
> > ../../../../libffi/src/aarch64/ffi.c:67:3: internal compiler error: in
> > emit_library_call_value_1, at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83466
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab ---
The same issue exists for SYMBOL_SMALL_TLSIE.
On Dec 5, 2020, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> ../../../../libffi/src/aarch64/ffi.c: In function 'ffi_prep_closure_loc':
> ../../../../libffi/src/aarch64/ffi.c:67:3: internal compiler error: in
> emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:5300
>67 | __builtin___clear_cache (start, end);
> |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98156
Bug ID: 98156
Summary: [Coarray] alloc_comp_1.f90 tests for wrong condition
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Hi Joseph,
the patch to drop qualifiers during lvalue conversion
was broken, because the code to emit atomic loads did
not trigger anymore. I now added a test that scans for
"atomic_load".
I should have taken the new warning for
_Atomic int y;
y; // warning statement with no effect
as a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97093
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:40234200864b6c0d0079abbcdc7a4139b60257ff
commit r11-5799-g40234200864b6c0d0079abbcdc7a4139b60257ff
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97093
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:904ac8577521b8152b97e9b549c1a1ca569a3d1f
commit r11-5798-g904ac8577521b8152b97e9b549c1a1ca569a3d1f
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
Hi Jeff!
On 11/30/20 8:22 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> I also took care of updating cris and mn103 status WRT cc0. Attached is
> what was pushed to the gcc-wwwdocs trunk.
Now that VAX has been converted as well, the entry can be updated here as well.
Now there are only AVR and CR16 that need to be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95294
--- Comment #5 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Maciej W. Rozycki from comment #4)
> Conversion complete.
Great. The Bountysource campaign closes the moment you close this bug report.
Then every supporter can vote whether they
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020, Jeff Law wrote:
> Sweet. OK once the prereqs are all ACK'd.
Thank you for your review. I have applied all the changes now, as posted
in their most recent versions, except for 01/31 where I have noticed an
anomaly in the included
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95294
--- Comment #4 from Maciej W. Rozycki ---
Conversion complete.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58901
Maciej W. Rozycki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ma...@linux-mips.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95294
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Maciej W. Rozycki :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4f47fca1d0fc2c6efef791d6dd115abd9d221733
commit r11-5797-g4f47fca1d0fc2c6efef791d6dd115abd9d221733
Author: Maciej W. Rozycki
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95294
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Maciej W. Rozycki :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e552abe2ba27ccec0d7c0d050b4617f2f636dd63
commit r11-5796-ge552abe2ba27ccec0d7c0d050b4617f2f636dd63
Author: Maciej W. Rozycki
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67548
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Maciej W. Rozycki :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:76a553587f3181605c57801c37b0d3e94ce3aca5
commit r11-5795-g76a553587f3181605c57801c37b0d3e94ce3aca5
Author: Maciej W. Rozycki
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69866
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Maciej W. Rozycki :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:76a553587f3181605c57801c37b0d3e94ce3aca5
commit r11-5795-g76a553587f3181605c57801c37b0d3e94ce3aca5
Author: Maciej W. Rozycki
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58901
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Maciej W. Rozycki :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a27d5f9a73978f20cfef1796a94f6a1a82438146
commit r11-5761-ga27d5f9a73978f20cfef1796a94f6a1a82438146
Author: Matt Thomas
Date:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 6:12 AM Alan Modra wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:10:58PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> > Fixes
> > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/signbit-1.c scan-assembler-not stxvd2x
> > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/signbit-1.c scan-assembler-times mfvsrd 3
> > FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98152
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-12-05
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97421
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roman Zhuykov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4eb8f93d026eaa1de9b4820337069f3ce3465cd0
commit r11-5760-g4eb8f93d026eaa1de9b4820337069f3ce3465cd0
Author: Roman Zhuykov
Date:
Hi,
I'm currently trying to put together a testsuite for the shared coarray
branch. What I have so far is a directory
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/caf-shared
which contains the attached dejagnu file plus the test cases
This works with the command
make check-fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98155
Bug ID: 98155
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: slp, in
vect_init_pattern_stmt
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98151
--- Comment #5 from Brad Bell ---
Compiling with
g++ -fsanitize=undefined -O2 int_output.cpp -o int_output
does in fact give a very useful message
I scanned the page
https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs/
and looked for things that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98141
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98016
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98016
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7ae210d5db5eb96989b2f639e65678b5597e61f0
commit r11-5759-g7ae210d5db5eb96989b2f639e65678b5597e61f0
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98154
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Binutils is not part of GCC. It has its own bugzilla at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98151
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Compiling with -fsanitize=undefined (as suggested by the bug reporting
guidelines) would have shown the undefined behaviour.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98147
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #28 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1352bc88a0525743c952197fb2db6e4f8c091cde
commit r11-5758-g1352bc88a0525743c952197fb2db6e4f8c091cde
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date:
> can someone explain to me why the -O2 optimizer is not able(allowed) to
> reduce this small sample the same way as clang/msvc?
Change the name of the function to something else than "main".
--
Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98154
--- Comment #1 from Luis ---
avr-binutils version 2.35
with version 2.32 work's fine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98154
Bug ID: 98154
Summary: avr-size (avr-binutils v2.35) don't' accept
--formart=avr
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
On December 5, 2020 11:59:22 AM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 11:22:24AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >two_value_replacement and didn't restrict it to !early_p. Shall we
>> >instead
>> >do two_value_replacement only in late phiopt?
>>
>> Yeah, I guess that would
On December 5, 2020 11:57:46 AM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 11:20:11AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >As mentioned in the PR, for boolean x we currently optimize
>> >in phiopt x ? 0 : -1 into -(int)!x but it can be optimized as
>> >(int) x - 1 which is one less
On 12/2/20 7:57 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 12/1/20 1:28 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> On 11/24/20 11:10 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>> On 11/22/20 3:05 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi,
this avoids the need to use -fno-threadsafe-statics on
arm-none-eabi or working around that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98145
--- Comment #3 from Brecht Sanders
---
Fixing gcc/config/nvptx/mkoffload.c got me one step further, but now the
parameters seem to be the issue:
lto1.exe: error: unrecognized command-line option '-mgomp'
lto1.exe: error: '-foffload-abi' option
> gcc does not reduce to call result if called function is not static in
> -O2 (will do with -O2)
> clang and msvc does it also in -O2 regardless of the function beeing
> static or not
>
> can someone explain to me why the -O2 optimizer is not able(allowed) to
> reduce this small sample the same
gcc does not reduce to call result if called function is not static in
-O2 (will do with -O2)
clang and msvc does it also in -O2 regardless of the function beeing
static or not
can someone explain to me why the -O2 optimizer is not able(allowed) to
reduce this small sample the same way as
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:10:58PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> Fixes
> FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/signbit-1.c scan-assembler-not stxvd2x
> FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/signbit-1.c scan-assembler-times mfvsrd 3
> FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/signbit-1.c scan-assembler-times srdi 3
> FAIL:
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 11:22:24AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >two_value_replacement and didn't restrict it to !early_p. Shall we
> >instead
> >do two_value_replacement only in late phiopt?
>
> Yeah, I guess that would make sense. I don't remember exactly but I saw
> regressions with early
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 11:20:11AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >As mentioned in the PR, for boolean x we currently optimize
> >in phiopt x ? 0 : -1 into -(int)!x but it can be optimized as
> >(int) x - 1 which is one less operation both in GIMPLE and in x86
> >assembly.
> >
>
On December 5, 2020 10:14:49 AM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
wrote:
>Hi!
>
>The following patch improves code generation on the included testcase
>by
>enabling two_value_replacement on booleans. It does that only for
>arg0/arg1
>values that conditional_replacement doesn't handle, and only does it
On December 5, 2020 10:10:25 AM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
wrote:
>Hi!
>
>As mentioned in the PR, for boolean x we currently optimize
>in phiopt x ? 0 : -1 into -(int)!x but it can be optimized as
>(int) x - 1 which is one less operation both in GIMPLE and in x86
>assembly.
>
../../../../libffi/src/aarch64/ffi.c: In function 'ffi_prep_closure_loc':
../../../../libffi/src/aarch64/ffi.c:67:3: internal compiler error: in
emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:5300
67 | __builtin___clear_cache (start, end);
| ^~~~
Andreas.
--
> [AMD Public Use]
>
>
> As per https://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html#ChangeLogs
>
> --Snip--
> ChangeLogs
> ChangeLog entries are part of git commit messages and are automatically put
> into a corresponding ChangeLog file.
> --Snip--
>
> This means Changelog files will be updated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64236
Jonas Hahnfeld changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hahnjo at hahnjo dot de
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98153
Bug ID: 98153
Summary: [11 Regression] libgo ftbfs on i686-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98151
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Hi!
The following patch improves code generation on the included testcase by
enabling two_value_replacement on booleans. It does that only for arg0/arg1
values that conditional_replacement doesn't handle, and only does it if not
in the early phiopt pass, because conditional_replacement isn't
Hi Segher,
I've been holding off pinging these knowing you had a lot of other
review work, but maybe that's settling down now? You already OK'd
1/8, 2/8 and 6/8.
[PATCH 3/8] [RS6000] rs6000_rtx_costs tidy AND
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/555754.html
[PATCH 4/8]
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, for boolean x we currently optimize
in phiopt x ? 0 : -1 into -(int)!x but it can be optimized as
(int) x - 1 which is one less operation both in GIMPLE and in x86 assembly.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
And/or, shall we have a
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 08:22:23AM +, Kumar, Venkataramanan via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> [AMD Public Use]
>
>
> As per https://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html#ChangeLogs
>
> --Snip--
> ChangeLogs
> ChangeLog entries are part of git commit messages and are automatically put
> into a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98152
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98152
Bug ID: 98152
Summary: [11 regression] /usr/bin/env: 'python': No such file
or directory
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
[AMD Public Use]
As per https://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html#ChangeLogs
--Snip--
ChangeLogs
ChangeLog entries are part of git commit messages and are automatically put
into a corresponding ChangeLog file.
--Snip--
This means Changelog files will be updated automatically? I did not do
70 matches
Mail list logo
