On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Janne Blomqvist
blomqvist.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch should make gfortran support 2 GB files on MinGW.
I don't have a windows installation to test on, so I don't know if
this works or not. Though I regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu to
Hi all,
Please find attached a patch I built to add stdint-related
information
to GCC configuration for the mingw target (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-04/msg0.html
for more details about why).
Thanks for this. I am just in the process of doning a testsuite run on exactly
)
{
-Original Message-
From: FX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 April 2008 12:28 a.m.
To: GCC Development; Danny Smith
Subject: Bootstrap failure on native mingw32
I'm not exactly sure how this one was introduced, but a bootstrap on
native i686-pc-mingw32 dies in stage1 libgcc
On Feb 18, 2008 10:59 AM, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2008-02-17 Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR bootstrap/35218
* Makefile.in (build_file_translate): New.
(gcc-vers.texi): Use it for translating $(abs_srcdir).
*
On Feb 20, 2008 10:02 PM, Danny Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 18, 2008 10:59 AM, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2008-02-17 Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR bootstrap/35218
* Makefile.in (build_file_translate): New.
(gcc
Kai Tietz
Tuesday, 10 July 2007 11:19 p.m.
Hi,
I tried to build the cross-compiler for the target
x86_64-pc-mingw32 and
noticed some trouble about the crtbegin and crtend for this
target. To the
specfile this object was introduced by the patch of Danny
Smith from the
14th
Hello
On i686-pc-mingw32 I can build a libbid-enabled libgcc by adding
--enable-decimal-float=bid to configure and
setting ENABLE_DFP=1 in environment when running make bootstrap.
make -k check-gcc RUNSTESTFLAGS='dfp.exp sets
check_effective_target_dfprt as true abd gives:
===
Or
am I missing a more fundamental reason for the limited
range of targets
supporting DFP?
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1176.pdf
Thanks.
Danny
Angelo Graziosi
Wednesday, 4 July 2007 7:19 p.m.
I have build GFortran under Cygwin configuring with:
./configure --prefix=${prefix_dir} \
--enable-languages=c,fortran \
--enable-bootstrap \
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Mitchell
Sent: Saturday, 16 June 2007 11:47 a.m.
Chris Lattner wrote:
This construct seems like it should be rejected by the C++
front-end.
The source is making two contradictory
Ian Lance Taylor
Friday, 8 June 2007 1:52 a.m.
At the very least there should be a compiler option for standard
conformant behaviour in this area. I didn't see one in the MSDN docs.
I would say that gets is much more dangerous than %n in printf, but
presumably Microsoft does not disable
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Simon Brenner
Sent: Thursday, 7 June 2007 2:40 a.m.
Or just add a call to _set_printf_count_output in the relevant
place, since AFAIK %n is still a standard-mandated printf format
flag.
cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
/cygdrive/e/gnu/gcc-4.3-20070511/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_int
ro/headers/all_c++200x_compatibility.cc:1:
error: -ffunction-sections may affect debugging on some targets
This is actually a useful warning, since -ffunction-sections not only
libstdc++ configure is already probing to see if the target
supports the
use of this flag without errors. It thinks AIX and cygwin can
use this
flag without errors or warnings, which is clearly wrong.
So, something needs to be fixed.
Can you try
int i;
with -Werror
Can you try
int i;
with -Werror -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections and see if
you get an
error with g++?
With GNU C++ version 4.3.0 20070513 (experimental)
(i686-pc-mingw32dw2)
No error. i is put in its own section .data$i
But error when I add -g to above
if not,
The failing command is trying to compile the PCH. This means that
we're including a large number of libstdc++ headers in a
row. One of
the first ones pulls in c++config.h, which has #undef
max; but so far,
nothing has included windows.h. Later, something includes
Richard Henderson wrote
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:16:20PM -, Dave Korn wrote:
Presumably there would be no problem in just waiting
until runtime to
initialise the my_malloc_hook variable dynamically instead
of trying to
statically initialise it?
Dunno. One could also wait to
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Zuxy Meng
Sent: Wednesday, 7 March 2007 12:36 a.m.
I've uploaded a proposed patch for this bug
(http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13151action=diff).
Putting
crtfastmath.o in the
On mingw, I get the following:
$ cat a.c
int foo(int x) { return x+1; }
$ gcc.exe -mrtd a.c -shared -o a.dll
$ nm a.dll | grep foo
100011c0 T _foo
$ cat b.c
int __stdcall foo(int x) { return x+1; }
$ gcc.exe b.c -shared -o b.dll
$ nm b.dll | grep foo
100011c0 T [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2006-11-06 Jan van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* configure.ac: Fixed typo in case statement: :: changed to ;;
Sorry, that was my typo. I have committed your patch, with additional
* configure: Regenerate.
as obvious. Thanks.
Danny
[Resend]
From: Mark Mitchell
Sent: Saturday, 4 November 2006 9:28 a.m.
I recently tried to use a MinGW GCC (built from FSF sources) to link
with a .lib file that had been compiled with MSVC, and got link-time
errors about _chkstk. After some searching, I understand what this
function is
From: Mark Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 3:38 PM
Danny Smith wrote:
The problem I had was with the second case below. We don't
know if a
method is implicitly virtual until search.c:look_for_overrides_r).
Would t be better to unset
From: Mark Mitchell
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
Is any of you able to give some comments on pr27650
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27650
In particular I am interested in an opinion of Danny's fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg01504.html
The
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:46:36 +1200
From: Danny Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mark Kettenis
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 9:34 AM
The best thing to do is probably to define
DWARF2_FRAME_REG_OUT to always use the SVR4 register map.
Thanks for that advice. I'm in process
Mark Mitchell wrote:
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 4:59 AM
Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Jul 14, 2006, at 1:17 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
We currently search both the relocated compilers prefix and the
originally configured prefix. Should a relocated compiler be
searching both
Currently in config/i386/cygming.h we have this:
#undef DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER
#define DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER(n) (write_symbols == DWARF2_DEBUG \
? svr4_dbx_register_map[n] \
: dbx_register_map[n])
This is fine as long as we assume
At http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-06/msg00911.html
Mark Mitchell wrote:
I think it would be better to adopt [mingw-targetted] G++ to use
whatever method Microsoft uses to handle static destructions.
Ultimately, I would like to see G++ support the Microsoft C++ ABI --
unless we can convince
From: Ranjit Mathew
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 1:28 PM
Danny Smith wrote:
Adding a real __cxa_atexit to mingw runtime is of course also
possible, but I thought I'd attempt the easy options first.
When you say runtime, do you mean libstdc++ or something like
libmingwex.a in mingw
to parallel flag_use_cxa_atexit.
Adding a real __cxa_atexit to mingw runtime is of course also possible,
but I thought I'd attempt the easy options first.
I would appreciate any comments.
Danny
/* mingw32-cxa_atexit.c
Contributed by Danny Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Copyright (C) 2006 Free
Mark Mitchell wrote at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-03/msg00441.html
Here is a sample program which does the right thing (no spurious
console
windows, all output visible) when run either from a console or from
Christian Joensson wrote
I haven't bootstrapped gcc on cygwin for a while now... but, using gcc
cvs trunk LAST_UPDATED: Fri Aug 5 09:05:37 UTC 2005, I get comparison
warnings...:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1obj-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
From: Christopher Faylor
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 9:33 AM
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 05:23:54PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Maybe one solution would be to patch pex-win32 for mingw so that it
could understand '#!' style shell scripts? That would at
least allow
bootstrapping.
That
I have found an apparent bug in gcc 3.4.4 under Cygwin. The attached test
case (and the code
it's derived from) works as expected with Cygwin gcc 3.3.3 with the exact
same Cygwin install
except the compiler packages. It also works fine with various versions of gcc
on other
platforms,
Ada fails in stage1; the offender is gnatbind.exe. It crashes even if invoked
with no command-line arguments. Gdb provides the following information:
( gdb) run
Starting program: C:\gcc401install\gccbuild\gcc\stage1/gnatbind.exe
Program received signal SIGSEGV,
Segmentation fault.
34 matches
Mail list logo
