https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116010
--- Comment #7 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Created attachment 58729
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58729=edit
Testsuite results with/without bisected commit.
Regarding the gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90, I'm attaching a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116010
--- Comment #6 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> (In reply to Thiago Jung Bauermann from comment #3)
> > > First gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vabs.c now calls memcpy because of the
> > > restrict instead
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116010
--- Comment #4 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> The gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90 testcase is incredibly bad because it has so
> many loops that are or are not vectorized. It should ideally be split
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116010
--- Comment #3 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Created attachment 58725
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58725=edit
mve-vabs.s generated by the test after commit c290e6a0b7a9.
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115140
Thiago Jung Bauermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116010
Bug ID: 116010
Summary: [15 regression] vectorization regressions on arm and
aarch64 since r15-491-gc290e6a0b7a9de
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115707
Bug ID: 115707
Summary: [15 regression] FAIL in gcc.target/aarch64/sve/sad_1.c
since gcc-15-863-ga3aeff4ce95b
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115157
Thiago Jung Bauermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115373
Thiago Jung Bauermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115253
--- Comment #16 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115253
Thiago Jung Bauermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115253
--- Comment #2 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Created attachment 58298
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58298=edit
gcc.log for Cortext M55
These log files were obtained with GCC commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115253
--- Comment #1 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Created attachment 58297
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58297=edit
gcc.log for Cortext M23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115253
Bug ID: 115253
Summary: New tests added by r14-10122-gad45086178d833 fail on
Cortex M23 and M55 bare metal targets
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91970
--- Comment #16 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #15)
> (In reply to Thiago Jung Bauermann from comment #14)
> > This came up in the context of a Linux kernel patch series providing a
> > "Unified
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91970
Thiago Jung Bauermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114568
Bug ID: 114568
Summary: [14 regression] g++.dg/vect/pr84556.cc fails to
produce executable since r14-9706-gb8e7aaaf350a45
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99829
--- Comment #9 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Hello Vladimir,
Sorry for the delay in getting back to this.
(In reply to GCC Commits from comment #8)
> The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov
> :
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99829
--- Comment #6 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Created attachment 57683
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57683=edit
Preprocessed source file.
I was able to reproduce the ICE on my x86_64 laptop with the following
commands.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99829
Thiago Jung Bauermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111802
--- Comment #5 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
I can confirm this is fixed in our setup. Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111802
--- Comment #2 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Thank you for responding.
Yes, I checked commit 5266f930bed0 ("Daily bump.") from yesterday and it's
still present.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113526
--- Comment #2 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
I verified the fix here.
Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113611
Bug ID: 113611
Summary: [14 Regression] gcc.dg/pr110279-1.c fails on cross
build since gcc-14-5779-g746344dd538
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113526
Bug ID: 113526
Summary: [14 Regression ARM] gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c fails
since gcc-14-7248-g76bc70387d9
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113510
Thiago Jung Bauermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113510
--- Comment #1 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Created attachment 57168
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57168=edit
Preprocessed version of pr71494.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113510
Bug ID: 113510
Summary: [ARM Thumb] ICE in extract_constrain_insn with CPU
cortex-m23
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111802
Bug ID: 111802
Summary: New analyser diagram failures since commit
b365e9d57ad4
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111071
Thiago Jung Bauermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25
--- Comment #8 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Confirmed. All the failures I reported are fixed in trunk. Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25
Bug ID: 25
Summary: tree-ssa.exp and vect.exp failures after commit
99b5921bfc8f
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111071
--- Comment #1 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Created attachment 55761
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55761=edit
gcc.log from commit a32de58c9e63, parent of e7a36e4715c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111071
Bug ID: 111071
Summary: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/aarch64-sve-acle-asm.exp
has new failures since commit e7a36e4715c7
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110796
--- Comment #10 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #8)
> (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #6)
> > Is the exception status supposed to be in a defined state when the test
> > runs?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110796
--- Comment #7 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #5)
> OK, so it signals FE_INVALID on the first test. Can you run this with the
> same options, and see what happens?
It ran normally:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110796
--- Comment #4 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Thanks for looking into this.
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #3)
> Do the failure only occur at -Os?
Only at -Os. The FAILs I mentioned in the bug report are the only ones that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110796
--- Comment #2 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Thanks for the quick response!
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Does pr91323.c fail on arm?
No, all its tests pass:
PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr91323.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110796
Bug ID: 110796
Summary: builtin_iseqsig fails some tests in
armv8l-linux-gnueabihf
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110727
--- Comment #2 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Thanks! I confirmed that I can't reproduce the problem anymore in trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
--- Comment #15 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Thanks! I confirmed that I can't reproduce the problem anymore in trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110756
--- Comment #2 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Ah! Thanks for the analysis. Should I submit the following patch to the mailing
list then?
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/pr58567.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/pr58567.C
index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110756
Bug ID: 110756
Summary: [14 Regression] commit g:92d1425ca78 causes failures
in g++.dg/gomp/pr58567.C
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103902
--- Comment #12 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
I confirmed that this fixed the failures I was seeing. Thanks again!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103902
--- Comment #10 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
(In reply to Lewis Hyatt from comment #9)
> Thanks, sorry about that, I need to replace "unsigned long" with "size_t".
> Will fix it.
No problem. Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103902
Thiago Jung Bauermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
--- Comment #10 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Thank you very much for digging into this!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
--- Comment #1 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Created attachment 55584
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55584=edit
Preprocessed ira.cc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
Bug ID: 110742
Summary: [14 Regression] cc1plus ICE "Floating point exception"
during profiled bootstrap since commit 08b99fe8ad6
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110727
Bug ID: 110727
Summary: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/aarch64-sve.exp has two new
failures since commit 061f74c0673
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110371
Thiago Jung Bauermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110371
--- Comment #1 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Created attachment 55388
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55388=edit
Dump file.
This is the dump file generated by the -freport-bug run from the previous
attachment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110371
Bug ID: 110371
Summary: gfortran ICE "verify_gimple failed" in
gfortran.dg/vect/pr51058-2.f90
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110308
Thiago Jung Bauermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot
54 matches
Mail list logo