On 4/4/19, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 03 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
>> On 4/3/19, Martin Jambor wrote:
>>> Hello Joshi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 01 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
HI,
Discussing the project with Andi, I have drafted a proposal, please
review and suggest
>>>
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 03 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
> On 4/3/19, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> Hello Joshi,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 01 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
>>> HI,
>>> Discussing the project with Andi, I have drafted a proposal, please
>>> review and suggest
>>> necessary changes.
>>> If some OpenMP expert
On 4/3/19, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hello Joshi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 01 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
>> HI,
>> Discussing the project with Andi, I have drafted a proposal, please
>> review and suggest
>> necessary changes.
>> If some OpenMP experts from GCC have some ideas or changes please
>> suggest.
>
Hello Joshi,
On Mon, Apr 01 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
> HI,
> Discussing the project with Andi, I have drafted a proposal, please
> review and suggest
> necessary changes.
> If some OpenMP experts from GCC have some ideas or changes please suggest.
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1axElw-I
HI,
Discussing the project with Andi, I have drafted a proposal, please
review and suggest
necessary changes.
If some OpenMP experts from GCC have some ideas or changes please suggest.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1axElw-I5pTwcjI4iMle5NhLeRCcshIjH5ZHm3GGwsZU/edit?usp=sharing
Thanks,
Sameera
On 3/26/19, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> That is a correct diagnostics.
>>
>> See Canonical loop form.
>>
>> test-exprOne of the following:
>> var relational-op b
>> b relational-op var
>>
>> ( var relational-op b )
>> is neither of those.
>
> Still se
> That is a correct diagnostics.
>
> See Canonical loop form.
>
> test-expr One of the following:
> var relational-op b
> b relational-op var
>
> ( var relational-op b )
> is neither of those.
Still seems strange to fail for some meaningle
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:30:28PM +0530, sameeran joshi wrote:
> > I'd need to see an example of what you are talking about.
>
> int i;
> #pragma omp parallel for
> for (i = (0) ; (i< (20)) ; i++) {
> printf ("\ntest expression fails due to brackets");
>
On 3/26/19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 05:41:26PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> sameeran joshi writes:
>>
>> > On 3/24/19, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:49:11PM +0530, sameeran joshi wrote:
>> >>> 1) check_structured_block_conditions()
>> >>> checks for th
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 05:41:26PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> sameeran joshi writes:
>
> > On 3/24/19, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:49:11PM +0530, sameeran joshi wrote:
> >>> 1) check_structured_block_conditions()
> >>> checks for the conditions related to a structured blo
sameeran joshi writes:
> On 3/24/19, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:49:11PM +0530, sameeran joshi wrote:
>>> 1) check_structured_block_conditions()
>>> checks for the conditions related to a structured block
>>> 1.no returns in block
>>
>> returns should be allowed insid
On 3/24/19, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:49:11PM +0530, sameeran joshi wrote:
>> 1) check_structured_block_conditions()
>> checks for the conditions related to a structured block
>> 1.no returns in block
>
> returns should be allowed inside statement expressions.
If I a
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:49:11PM +0530, sameeran joshi wrote:
> 1) check_structured_block_conditions()
> checks for the conditions related to a structured block
> 1.no returns in block
returns should be allowed inside statement expressions.
> 2.no gotos
> 3.no breaks
> a
Hi,
I tried doing a basic/incomplete patch(needs more detailed conditions
check) for implementing a structured block in Csmith code base.
The structured block is almost needed for most of the constructs which
would be further implemented.
0)
The patch identifies and labels each block(after block cr
Hello Sameeran,
On Sun, Feb 10 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
> Hi,I am an undergraduate student currently in final year of computer
> science and engineering degree course from Pune University, India. I
> and Shubham have been working on Last year's GSoC project idea :
>
> Implement a fuzzer leverag
Hi,I am an undergraduate student currently in final year of computer
science and engineering degree course from Pune University, India. I
and Shubham have been working on Last year's GSoC project idea :
Implement a fuzzer leveraging GCC extensions. Fuzzers like csmith are
fairly good at finding co
16 matches
Mail list logo
