Re: GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-04-19)

2006-04-20 Thread Victor Kaplansky
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 20-04-2006 12:47:54 AM: 3) autovectorization improvements Good autovectorization is becoming ever more-important in performance evaluation. Is there someone who can review this patch? Are there other things that are approximately ready for inclusion that we

GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-04-19)

2006-04-19 Thread Mark Mitchell
On the regression front, we have 61 open serious (P3 or higher) regressions that are specific to 4.2. I have not triaged these, so there is a good chance than more than a few relate to Ada, Java, Fortran, or non-primary, non-secondary platforms. I think that, therefore, the regressions which are

Re: GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-04-19)

2006-04-19 Thread H. J. Lu
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 02:47:54PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: On the regression front, we have 61 open serious (P3 or higher) regressions that are specific to 4.2. I have not triaged these, so there is a good chance than more than a few relate to Ada, Java, Fortran, or non-primary,

Re: GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-04-19)

2006-04-19 Thread Andrew Pinski
BTW, If anyone is interested in working on SEE for x86-64, please drop me a line. Why not do the comunication in public? -- Pinski

Re: GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-04-19)

2006-04-19 Thread H. J. Lu
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 06:01:54PM -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote: BTW, If anyone is interested in working on SEE for x86-64, please drop me a line. Why not do the comunication in public? Sure. Let me give a try. If I understand it correctly, the current SEE implementation tries to elimiate