Hi,
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 01:34:18PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
GCC 4.2.0 RC3 is now available from:
Successfully built on s390 and s390x:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-05/msg00142.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-05/msg00143.html
Bye,
-Andreas-
On 5/6/07, Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
2007-05-05 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* doc/install.texi (--disable-stage1-checking): Document.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] --disable-stage1-checking
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+Regardless of what
Richard Earnshaw wrote:
Mark Mitchell wrote:
GCC 4.2.0 RC3 is now available from:
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.2.0-20070501
This build now contains the fixes for the Ada build problem present in RC2.
At this point, I have no plans for an RC4. However, I am reviewing the
On 5/5/07, Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Earnshaw wrote:
Mark Mitchell wrote:
GCC 4.2.0 RC3 is now available from:
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.2.0-20070501
This build now contains the fixes for the Ada build problem present in RC2.
At this point, I have no
Richard Guenther wrote:
Another problem is that --enable-checking hasn't been set to 'release',
so the stage1 binary is too big to run on my ARM systems (and the
compiler will be unnecessarily slower than it needs to be).
Are you sure that we're not building with release-checking only?
On 5/5/07, Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
Another problem is that --enable-checking hasn't been set to 'release',
so the stage1 binary is too big to run on my ARM systems (and the
compiler will be unnecessarily slower than it needs to be).
Are you sure
On 5/5/07, Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/5/07, Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
Another problem is that --enable-checking hasn't been set to 'release',
so the stage1 binary is too big to run on my ARM systems (and the
compiler will be
On 5/5/07, Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/5/07, Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/5/07, Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
Another problem is that --enable-checking hasn't been set to 'release',
so the stage1 binary is too big
Richard Guenther wrote:
2007-05-05 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* doc/install.texi (--disable-stage1-checking): Document.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] --disable-stage1-checking
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+Regardless of what is specified with @samp{--enable-checking} the
Mark Mitchell wrote:
GCC 4.2.0 RC3 is now available from:
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.2.0-20070501
This build now contains the fixes for the Ada build problem present in RC2.
At this point, I have no plans for an RC4. However, I am reviewing the
various open
GCC 4.2.0 RC3 is now available from:
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.2.0-20070501
It does not build LLVM there seems to be a stdlib++ problem.
I cannot really file a BugZilla report as I have not distilled the code down
to make an accurate report.
Aaron
Mark Mitchell wrote:
GCC 4.2.0 RC3 is now available from:
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.2.0-20070501
This build now contains the fixes for the Ada build problem present in RC2.
At this point, I have no plans for an RC4. However, I am reviewing the
various open issues, and
GCC 4.2.0 RC3 is now available from:
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.2.0-20070501
This build now contains the fixes for the Ada build problem present in RC2.
At this point, I have no plans for an RC4. However, I am reviewing the
various open issues, and available patches, so I might
The RTEMS community is still building and trying to test RC2.
We always build with newlib.
Ralf encountered problems on the avr and bfin during the tool
build and has filed or updated PRs for those.
I am now building the complete RTEMS source tree and tests
for every board and multilib. The
Joel Sherrill wrote:
Ralf encountered problems on the avr and bfin during the tool
build and has filed or updated PRs for those.
Understood, and thnanks for testing!
I should make clear that I don't see release candidates as opportunities
for general testing; they're final release candidates,
Mark Mitchell wrote:
Joel Sherrill wrote:
Ralf encountered problems on the avr and bfin during the tool
build and has filed or updated PRs for those.
Understood, and thnanks for testing!
I should make clear that I don't see release candidates as opportunities
for general testing;
16 matches
Mail list logo