On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 16:41:09 -0400
Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On 3/31/12 1:51 PM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
If we want to aim towards a more modular GCC made of several shared
libraries,
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 10:44:41AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 16:41:09 -0400
Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On 3/31/12 1:51 PM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
I've heard
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 16:41:09 -0400
Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On 3/31/12 1:51 PM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
If we want to aim towards a more modular GCC made of several shared
libraries,
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 05:40:37AM -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 16:41:09 -0400
Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On 3/31/12 1:51 PM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
If we
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
You appear to be moving in directions that may give pause to
those who championed better separation of concerns in GCC.
I am not sure to understand that last sentence (I had to read it 4 times,
with
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis
g...@integrable-solutions.net wrote:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
You appear to be moving in directions that may give pause to
those who championed better separation of concerns in GCC.
Quoting Basile Starynkevitch bas...@starynkevitch.net:
I also am in favor of having a software linked dynamically with shared
libraries, for a very pragramtical reason: If a software has shared
libraries, then modifying one such library in its implementation (not its
interface) is very often
On 3/31/12 1:51 PM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
If we want to aim towards a more modular GCC made of several shared libraries,
it seems
that we are requiring the host system to have dynamic libraries (which is not a
big deal
today; all the major OSes running on developers desktop or laptop
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 16:41:09 -0400
Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On 3/31/12 1:51 PM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
If we want to aim towards a more modular GCC made of several shared
libraries, it seems
that we are requiring the host system to have dynamic libraries (which is
Hello All,
If we want to aim towards a more modular GCC made of several shared libraries,
it seems
that we are requiring the host system to have dynamic libraries (which is not a
big deal
today; all the major OSes running on developers desktop or laptop have them).
In that case, I think that
10 matches
Mail list logo
