http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47505
Summary: [OOP] Intrinsics which should operate on polymorphic
objects (BT_CLASS)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47506
Summary: [OOP][Fortran 90+] Assumed-size array checks
(polymorphic and component)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid, diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47507
Summary: PURE functions with VALUE arguments invalidly rejectd
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43062
--- Comment #26 from Xavier zazzou at gmail dot com 2011-01-28 09:11:27 UTC
---
Thanks for your work.
Question : I tried to build my own version, but i did not succeed.
(1) gcc-4.5.2 : ok
(2) gcc-4.5.2 + modified/added files from trunk (4.6) :
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
Summary: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer
for pr42918.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
09:29:54 UTC ---
patch posted for review:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00881.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16896
Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16896
--- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-01-28
09:41:37 UTC ---
Ok, if you have to do something different for 36104, makes sense. Otherwise, if
you ask my opinion, being a temporary fix anyway, I would not be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47489
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46914
--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-01-28
09:43:44 UTC ---
Ok, with --with-arch-32=i486 in the configure options and -m32 on the command
line the problem can be reproduced.
Frankly, I don't understand what is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43062
--- Comment #27 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
09:45:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
Question : I tried to build my own version, but i did not succeed.
(1) gcc-4.5.2 : ok
(2) gcc-4.5.2 + modified/added files
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36104
--- Comment #15 from Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
09:51:23 UTC ---
Patches 1-3 restore gcc-4.2 behavior. Configure works, the library builds, most
all of the tests pass regression, etc.
Unfortunately, this is still
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47454
Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44554
Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47279
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
10:11:28 UTC ---
I am using the last 4.6 that built ok as host compiler, a snapshot from
6th december last year. Binutils is the 2.11 release, but the build
also failed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46317
Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46914
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44554
Christian Eggers christian.eggers at kathrein dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46762
Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibolton at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47044
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin10 |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47509
Summary: avr-gcc error: could not split insn
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45122
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
10:57:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Richi, which one is “second”? The second I posted, or the second in the
active
attachment list? (the third posted
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47498
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47504
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47477
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
11:04:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Alternatively, this narrowing of word mode operations could as well be done
during tree optimizations. I think the FE is the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47510
Summary: DW_TAG_typedef can have children when designating a
naming typedef
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47496
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
11:12:52 UTC ---
You should use
if (HAS_DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME_P (expr)
DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME_SET_P (expr))
DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME (expr);
calling decl_assembler_name on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47510
--- Comment #1 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
11:13:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 23149
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23149
Candidate patch
I am bootstrapping this patch at the moment.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47505
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28 11:20:04 UTC ---
I think the following ones should work fine (re-check?):
* ALLOCATED
* ASSOCIATED
* EXTENDS_TYPE_OF
* SAME_TYPE_AS
* STORAGE_SIZE
The array (+coarray?) intrinsics we
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44554
--- Comment #19 from Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
11:30:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
(In reply to comment #17)
gcc 4.4.5 was released in October. Please can you confirm if this is now
fixed.
I think THIS bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47497
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
11:42:11 UTC ---
Please specify the linker you are using and compile-flags you are using to
build SPEC - you should know the information you gave is not enough to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44174
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i686-linux |i686-linux,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47511
Summary: [C++0x] ICE: unexpected ast of kind template_decl in
potential_constant_expression_1, at
cp/semantics.c:7711
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47497
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
12:01:13 UTC ---
Works for me with -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops and
rpm -q binutils
binutils-2.20.0-0.7.9
using gold as plugin-ld.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47512
Summary: ICE in queue_insn, at haifa-sched.c:1322
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44174
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
12:36:54 UTC ---
Between 20110121 and 20110127, the new gcc.target/i386/asm-6.c test started
failing again on mainline (i386-pc-solaris2.1[01], 32-bit only):
It probably
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47512
--- Comment #1 from Jan-Jaap van der Heijden J.J.vanderHeijden at gmail dot
com 2011-01-28 12:37:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 23150
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23150
natString.ii
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47512
--- Comment #2 from Jan-Jaap van der Heijden J.J.vanderHeijden at gmail dot
com 2011-01-28 12:38:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 23151
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23151
natString.s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44174
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-01-28 12:40:52 UTC ---
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
12:36:54 UTC ---
Between 20110121 and 20110127,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47400
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-01-26 15:33:03 UTC ---
From my reading of libiconv 1.13.1 libcharset/tools/{irix-6.5,
osf1-5.1}, it seems that there isn't any such locale. If this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47513
Summary: [C++0x] [SFINAE] compiler rejects valid code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44174
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.4/4.5 Regression] can't |[4.4/4.5/4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47279
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
12:48:34 UTC ---
I assume the binutils 2.11 and 2.10 versions are typos and you meant 2.21 and
2.20? I'll fire off a build using your configure options and report back.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47514
Summary: Source file over a certain size compiles but will not
run
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44174
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-01-28 13:04:36 UTC ---
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
12:45:43 UTC ---
You're right: I somehow misread
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47514
--- Comment #1 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-01-28 13:33:41 UTC ---
could be windows specific, since both testcases run fine here
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu), with 4.3, 4.5 and 4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47514
Brendan brendanarnold at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||Windows XP - SP3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47497
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-01-28 13:46:06
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Please specify the linker you are using and compile-flags you are using to
build SPEC - you should know the information you gave is not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47515
Summary: Issues porting libgo to IRIX 6.5
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
AssignedTo: i...@airs.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28 13:53:25
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jan 28 13:53:19 2011
New Revision: 169356
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169356
Log:
2011-01-28 Paul Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35810
--- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28 13:53:25
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jan 28 13:53:19 2011
New Revision: 169356
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169356
Log:
2011-01-28 Paul Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47350
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28 13:53:25
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jan 28 13:53:19 2011
New Revision: 169356
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169356
Log:
2011-01-28 Paul Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47497
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46567
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Marlier patrick.marlier at gmail dot com
2011-01-28 14:18:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 23153
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23153
testcase with O0
With this testcase and -O0:
$ gcc -fgnu-tm -O0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44174
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
14:29:30 UTC ---
Ok for mainline (I'll post to gcc-patches anyway)?
Sure, thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47454
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47513
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-eabi|arm-eabi,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47350
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47516
Summary: ICE with reallocate on assignment w/
--disable-bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35810
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
14:59:03 UTC ---
Close as FIXED (for the 4.6 trunk).
Left overs:
- ICE mentioned in comment 12 - now PR 47516
- Assignment to polymorphic LHS, PR 43366
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35810
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44031
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47279
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47516
--- Comment #1 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com paul.richard.thomas
at gmail dot com 2011-01-28 15:14:24 UTC ---
gcc version 4.5.0 20100604??? version is marked as 4.6.0
Paul
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:59 PM, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325
--- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-01-28 15:15:37 UTC ---
Is this going to be fixed for 4.6.0 or should we XFAIL the test? This
PR has been open for 5 months now.
Rainer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47517
Summary: Rallocate on assignment: Segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
15:19:23 UTC ---
The test is invalid on i[345]86-*-* without also enabling -msse. A fix is to
add
/* { dg-options -msse { target i[345]86-*-* } } */
probably also for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47518
Summary: va_arg causes segmentation fault in case of variable
length argument
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47518
--- Comment #1 from jur.pauw at gmail dot com 2011-01-28 15:26:41 UTC ---
If gcc version 3.4.4 is used then the program executes correctly.
Version information:
Reading specs from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325
--- Comment #15 from Dave Korn davek at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28 15:28:33
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
The test is invalid on i[345]86-*-* without also enabling -msse.
Does the same apply to libcpp/lex.c? i.e. Is that code invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47519
Summary: ICE on allocation of with deferred-length string
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325
--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-01-28 15:32:50 UTC ---
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, davek at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325
--- Comment #15 from Dave Korn davek at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
15:35:02 UTC ---
TODO:
- Function result variables which are character(len=:), pointer
(according to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-01/msg00264.html item (v))
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35810
--- Comment #17 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
15:35:05 UTC ---
Another follow up:
Bug 47517 - the example from c.l.f linked to from comment 0 fails
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47518
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47518
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
15:39:50 UTC ---
Also note that gcc 4.2 is no longer maintained, so even if there is a bug in
that version it won't get fixed. Please try a newer release.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47520
Summary: [trans-mem] ICE Segmentation fault at 01
Product: gcc
Version: trans-mem
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47279
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47279
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
15:48:08 UTC ---
I don't have binaries anymore but it was built from SVN rev. 167488. So using
a gcc 4.6 with that revision as host compiler should reproduce the problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47518
--- Comment #4 from jur.pauw at gmail dot com 2011-01-28 15:54:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 23156
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23156
preprocessed output that triggers va_arg segmentation fault
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47518
jur.pauw at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.2.2 |4.4.5
--- Comment #5 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47514
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47518
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47510
--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28
16:13:07 UTC ---
Patch posted to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg02118.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47049
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47514
--- Comment #4 from Brendan brendanarnold at gmail dot com 2011-01-28
16:52:12 UTC ---
Was using the MinGW bundled with PythonXY
Now upgraded to version 4.5.2 and it works fine
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46235
--- Comment #2 from Tony Poppleton tony.poppleton at gmail dot com 2011-01-28
16:55:48 UTC ---
Based on Richard's comment, I tried a modified version of the code replacing
the (1 x) with just (16).
This shows that GCC (4.6 4.5.2) does perform
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47500
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28 16:56:34
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Hints or tiny patch appreciated.
You need to find out whether/how this works for the C compiler.
What do you mean? It dictates
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46235
--- Comment #3 from Tony Poppleton tony.poppleton at gmail dot com 2011-01-28
17:02:50 UTC ---
Actually what I said above isn't correct - had it compiled down to bt $4, %al
then it would make sense to do that special case, but as it used testb it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47511
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47521
Summary: Unnecessary usage of edx register
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47521
Tony Poppleton tony.poppleton at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.3.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46235
--- Comment #4 from Tony Poppleton tony.poppleton at gmail dot com 2011-01-28
18:08:15 UTC ---
As a quick test, I commented out the block with the following comment in
fold-const.c:
/* If this is an EQ or NE comparison with zero and ARG0 is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44031
--- Comment #10 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-01-28
18:28:11 UTC ---
Backporting r162726 to 4.5.2 and 4.4.5 prevents the ICE there too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47519
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44031
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44031
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-01-28 18:43:27
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/28/11 11:28, mikpe at it dot uu.se wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44031
--- Comment
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
