http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29571
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47600
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-03
16:58:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Does C* obey parentheses? If yes, the solution is the same as in Fortran ndist
> =(dist+d). If no, I think there is an option to disable reassociation
> (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47600
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever Confirmed|1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47600
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47492
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46941
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47573
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47600
Summary: gcc optimizer seems to avoid necessary floating-point
addition
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47598
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-03
16:25:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Can you create a standalone testcase to show this -fgraphite-identity -O2 bug?
I think that will be rather difficult to achieve since the bug is occurring in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46941
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
--- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernand
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47573
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47598
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-02-03 15:52:50
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Enabling -fgraphite at -O2 with...
>
> /sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/./prev-gcc/xgcc
> -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/./p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47598
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-03
15:36:59 UTC ---
Without a lto-bootstrap, using just...
../gcc-4.6-20110202/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.6
--mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.6/info
--enable-languages=c,c++,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47599
Summary: -fno-short-wchar does not force long wchar
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
--- Comment #20 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-02-03 15:33:37 UTC ---
> > on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11. Weak references don't work on this target and
> > probably others.
>
> If weak symbols do not work, why is then SUPPORTS_WEAK set? (Or,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47596
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47510
--- Comment #3 from Jan Kratochvil
2011-02-03 15:21:02 UTC ---
g++ (GCC) 4.6.0 20110203 (experimental) with the Comment 2 patch
template
class F {
typedef struct { int i; } C;
C a;
};
F f;
->
<1><2d>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47598
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-03
15:18:14 UTC ---
I forgot to mention this was in...
make[3]: *** [cp-demangle.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [all-stagefeedback-libiberty] Error 2
make[1]: *** [stagefeedback-bubble] Error 2
make: *** [profil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47598
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-03
15:05:54 UTC ---
../gcc-4.6-20110202/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.6
--mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.6/info
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --enable-stage1-languages=c,lto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47598
Summary: -fgraphite-identity at -O2 breaks profiledbootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47521
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-02-03 14:32:03
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/03/11 07:16, tony.poppleton at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47521
>
> --- Comment #5 from T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47558
--- Comment #35 from Iain Sandoe 2011-02-03 14:29:25
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> (In reply to comment #33)
> > (In reply to comment #32)
> >
> > > So either
> > >
> > > 1/revert 163267 as proposed,
> > > Are we sure that it has no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47558
--- Comment #34 from Iain Sandoe 2011-02-03 14:21:32
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> (In reply to comment #32)
>
> > So either
> >
> > 1/revert 163267 as proposed,
> > Are we sure that it has no effect on any other (esp. Java) test-cas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47521
--- Comment #5 from Tony Poppleton 2011-02-03
14:16:01 UTC ---
As a quick test, would this be fixed by re-ordering the register file to move
eax above edx?
If so, then another possible fix to this would be to effectively re-run the RA
pass multi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47596
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47558
--- Comment #33 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-03
13:57:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #32)
> So either
>
> 1/revert 163267 as proposed,
> Are we sure that it has no effect on any other (esp. Java) test-cases?
>
I'll regression test option
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47521
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-02-03 13:54:16
UTC ---
I'd hoped it would be possible to define a set of conditions under which
combine could combine the conditional move with the subsequent move into a hard
register. Without special cas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23200
--- Comment #46 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-03
13:23:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 23236
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23236
gcc46-pr23200-2.patch
Or we could perhaps for EXPAND_INITIALIZER just try harder to look at SSA_NAM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23200
--- Comment #45 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-03
13:19:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 23235
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23235
gcc46-pr23200-1.patch
So, if we want to make this work just with -ftree-ter, we could do something
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40722
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47312
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47312
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-03
10:53:21 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 3 10:53:19 2011
New Revision: 169786
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169786
Log:
PR target/47312
* expr.c (expand_expr_real_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #35 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-03
10:49:09 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 3 10:49:06 2011
New Revision: 169785
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169785
Log:
PR lto/47274
* lto-streamer-out.c (write_s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46567
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Marlier
2011-02-03 10:28:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 23234
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23234
new testcase with O0
Here a reduced test case that raises this ICE with current svn version:
$ gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-02-03 10:13:18 UTC ---
> --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-02
> 10:05:24 UTC ---
> And now a new version of that patch has been checked in. Can you verify if
> this bug still e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40722
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-03
10:05:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 23233
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23233
gcc46-pr40722.patch
Modified H.J.'s patch which just adds ()s around _rotl/_rotr/_lrotl/_lrotr
name
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47597
Anitha Boyapati changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||AVR
Host|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47597
Summary: ICE: call frame debugging information is not handled
when case is post_dec
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
--- Comment #18 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-02-03
09:53:50 UTC ---
To add to Tobias comment, in the patch the only place where a weakref is used
is
+#ifdef SUPPORTS_WEAK
+static int weak_gettime (clockid_t, struct timespec *)
+ __attribute__((__
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38564
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-02-03 09:40:15 UTC ---
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38564
>
> --- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski 2011-02-02
> 22:22:53 U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47555
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.4.6 |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40722
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46781
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46194
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-03
08:41:46 UTC ---
Sebastian, could you please look at this? Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46102
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47564
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47564
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-03
08:29:07 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 3 08:29:03 2011
New Revision: 169784
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169784
Log:
PR target/47564
* toplev.c (target_reinit):
101 - 150 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
