http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58256
--- Comment #12 from Chen Gang ---
I am just comparing the issue code demo and the other 3 correct code demo (the
demostrations which del one param, or add one param, or add two params are all
correct).
I find the issue code contents additonal on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
--- Comment #14 from Joshua Cogliati ---
Manuel López-Ibáñez, thank you for the patch review. I will make the changes
you requested, and rebase it against svn trunk, and run bootstrap and
testsuite. It may be a few weeks before I get this all do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
Oleg Smolsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56791
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Sep 21 00:00:38 2013
New Revision: 202808
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202808&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/56791
* config/pa/pa.c (pa_option_override): Dis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56791
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Fri Sep 20 23:58:43 2013
New Revision: 202807
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202807&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/56791
* config/pa/pa.c (pa_option_override): Dis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58488
Bug ID: 58488
Summary: -Wuninitialized is useless for a variable whose
address is later taken
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33763
--- Comment #43 from Juha Kallioinen ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #42)
> (In reply to Juha Kallioinen from comment #41)
> > Maybe this failure with a newly built gcc 4.8 is related to this bug.
>
> No, that is just a buggy testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33763
--- Comment #42 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Juha Kallioinen from comment #41)
> Maybe this failure with a newly built gcc 4.8 is related to this bug.
No, that is just a buggy testcase. Redefining a prototype, especially if you
have no id
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16371
roger pack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rogerdpack at gmail dot com
--- Comment #27
-checking=release --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit
--disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-lto
--enable-linker-build-id --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-threads=posix
--enable-shared --disable-libgcj
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.2 20130920 (prerelease) (GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
--- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Another potential issue is that your patch is against 4.8.1, but this is not a
regression, so it is very likely that maintainers will ask you to submit a
patch with respect to current trunk: http://www.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58481
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
--- Comment #14 from Oleg Smolsky ---
The ASan issue was due to the memory limit applied via setrlimit(). The virtual
size (in this -fPIC -pie build) is really huge and so memory allocations were
failing. I'll confirm the TSan case in a bit.
Than
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58481
--- Comment #7 from Damian Kaczmarek ---
Cheers guys, much appreciated. Keep up the good work.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58481
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Sep 20 21:04:09 2013
New Revision: 202797
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202797&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-09-20 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58481
* pt.c (tsu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58487
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 from Mar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
--- Comment #12 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
The patch looks mostly correct to me, but you will need a few extra details
before a maintainer (not me!) can accept it.
* You need to bootstrap + run the testsuite. You don't really need to add
testc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
--- Comment #13 from Oleg Smolsky ---
Created attachment 30875
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30875&action=edit
another stack
ASAN_OPTIONS=malloc_context_size=1 gets me passed the initial issue, but the
code gets stuck here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58471
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #2)
> Can be fixed with this patch:
... which regtests cleanly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
--- Comment #11 from Joshua Cogliati ---
Created attachment 30873
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30873&action=edit
Patch to add -Wfloat-conversion option
This version also is enabled with -Wextra.
$ gcc -o float_test float
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
--- Comment #8 from Kostya Serebryany ---
ouch!
free calling malloc. this is not going to work :)
This code has changed since our last merge to gcc --
the trunk version does not have strerror call any more.
I really hope to make another merge
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Smolsky ---
Created attachment 30874
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30874&action=edit
full stack
Here is the full stack. It comes from the very same spot in my app.
As for the minimal repro - that's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56875
--- Comment #6 from jbglaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jbglaw
Date: Fri Sep 20 19:00:02 2013
New Revision: 202796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202796&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Work around buggy gas not properly sign-extending a 64bit value
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
--- Comment #12 from Kostya Serebryany ---
You can also try
ASAN_OPTIONS=malloc_context_size=1 (or 0)
this will eliminate this particular call to mmap (but will reduce the
usefulness
of asan report)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58487
Bug ID: 58487
Summary: Missed return value optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Ass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
--- Comment #11 from Oleg Smolsky ---
Sure. The verbose thing does not yield much:
==1236== Parsed ASAN_OPTIONS: verbosity=1
==1236== AddressSanitizer: libc interceptors initialized
|| `[0x10007fff8000, 0x7fff]` || HighMem||
|| `[0x02
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
--- Comment #10 from Kostya Serebryany ---
Your stack traces tells me this:
__sanitizer::MmapOrDie calls strerror, which means that mmap call failed.
This may happen if the process OOM-ed (unlikely in your case),
or may have some kind of limit (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57850
--- Comment #11 from Dima ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #9)
> Created attachment 30818 [details]
> patch
>
> Can you verify that this patch fixes the issue?
Yes, it works for me and makes abi-compliance-checker function once again.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
--- Comment #9 from Oleg Smolsky ---
Hold on, I don't get the "more memory" bit. This happens very early, before
anything else of merit. Also, it turns out that this isn't a deadlock, the main
thread is spinning inside asan code.
USER PID %
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58417
Bug 58417 depends on bug 58484, which changed state.
Bug 58484 Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE in chrec_fold_plus_1, at
tree-chrec.c:272 building 416.gamess
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58484
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
--- Comment #6 from Kostya Serebryany ---
Is that the full stack trace?
(As usual, a reproducer will help us much)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57605
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 20 17:52:29 2013
New Revision: 202791
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202791&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/57605
libstdc++-v3/
* testsuite/lib/libstdc++.exp (libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58484
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58484
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Sep 20 17:49:45 2013
New Revision: 202790
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202790&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-20 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/58484
* tree-scalar-e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
--- Comment #9 from Joshua Cogliati ---
Created attachment 30871
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30871&action=edit
some floating conversion issues
This tests three of the floating conversion reduction in precision issues.
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55860
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
BTW, I did look at walking up the CFG to discover edge equivalences we could
add to our tables. We don't have access to the path through the dominator tree
that we've followed, so I had to use a fairly conse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58481
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58476
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bootstrap failure with Go |In top-level configure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58486
Bug ID: 58486
Summary: insufficient CFI generated for call-saved VFP
registers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58481
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Smolsky ---
BTW, I get an identical deadlock with ASan:
#0 0x7fe631504ae9 in syscall () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x7fe63363ddc0 in __sanitizer::internal_sched_yield ()
at
../../../../gcc48-google/libsaniti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57915
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
Joshua Cogliati changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56875
--- Comment #5 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
Created attachment 30872
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30872&action=edit
Updated patch including testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58476
--- Comment #2 from Tom Tromey ---
The problem occurs because I use --disable-static.
If I remove this, the bootstrap completes.
I am not sure whether or not this is a supported configuration.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58481
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Indeed, let's avoid the big , this is enough:
struct Test {
template inline void triggerTest (Args&&... fargs) { }
};
struct TestPickled : Test {
template void triggerTest (Args&&... fargs) {
[=](
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56038
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58467
--- Comment #5 from Paul Smith ---
Thank you!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
--- Comment #10 from Richard Neill ---
Thank you for adding this - I will certainly find it useful!
May I suggest that this warning be implicitly enabled by -Wextra, (even if it's
not enabled by -Wall) ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56038
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
Does mingw provide its own SSE/MMX intrinsic implementations?
Can mingw just include where SSE/MMX instrincis
is needed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56166
--- Comment #10 from Marc Glisse ---
Author: glisse
Date: Fri Sep 20 15:50:09 2013
New Revision: 202781
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202781&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-20 Marc Glisse
PR libstdc++/58338
* include/bits/allocat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58265
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
Author: glisse
Date: Fri Sep 20 15:50:09 2013
New Revision: 202781
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202781&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-20 Marc Glisse
PR libstdc++/58338
* include/bits/allocato
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58338
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse ---
Author: glisse
Date: Fri Sep 20 15:50:09 2013
New Revision: 202781
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202781&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-20 Marc Glisse
PR libstdc++/58338
* include/bits/allocato
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58467
--- Comment #6 from Paul Smith ---
A minor typo:
- attached to a variable with the static storage,
+ attached to a variable with static storage,
Also, I wonder if it might be helpful to be clear that it can ONLY be applied
to variables with stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58483
--- Comment #3 from dennis luehring ---
according to the feedback from the clang mailing list by Benjamin Kramer
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2013-September/032111.html
llvm seems to not have any problem in removing new/delete in t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56038
Jacek Caban changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jacek at codeweavers dot com
--- Comment #8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58359
Anatoly Sinyavin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a.sinyavin at samsung dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #42 from edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Fri Sep 20 14:10:14 2013
New Revision: 202778
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202778&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-20 Bernd Edlinger
PR middle-end/57748
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58355
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[F03] ICE with TYPE,|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #41 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #40)
> The issue is that we added the movmisaling-on-component-ref path
> for _correctness_ reasons. Now, if all misaligned accesses end up
> being expanded using
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58475
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||sh*-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58482
--- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente ---
Thanks Jakub for the clear answer.
The reduction operator should be strictly commutative!
and I now understand the meaning of
omp declare reduction (I hope)
so I modified it as you can see below
results
Din online konto vil blive begrænset
Dit kreditkort : 4571
Vi har for nylig opdaget, at der i dag var 3 forkerte login-
forsøg på din konto
Følgende IP-adresser blev registreret:
Ugyldigt login fra : *.*.68.122.rogers.com
Ugyldigt login fra : *.*.88.90.charter.net
Ugyldi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58482
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It is well known that we don't vectorize this, right now we only handle
accesses to the SIMD lane privatized vars that cover the whole size of those
vars, while in your testcase the access size is half the siz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58413
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Sep 20 13:26:07 2013
New Revision: 202776
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202776&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-20 Marek Polacek
PR sanitizer/58413
* ubsan.c (get_ub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58485
Vincent Lefèvre changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58484
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Hm, so are we expecting that instantiate_scev_r through
static tree
instantiate_scev_binary (basic_block instantiate_below,
struct loop *evolution_loop, struct loop *inner_loop,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58485
--- Comment #1 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
I forgot:
Version: GNU MP 5.1.2
Host type: coreinhm-unknown-linux-gnu
ABI: 64
Install prefix:/usr/local
Compiler: gcc-snapshot -std=gnu99
Static libr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58485
Bug ID: 58485
Summary: [4.9 Regression] GMP test on subnormal fails with LTO
and -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58481
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57850
Andrey Ponomarenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WORKSFORME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58453
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58453
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Sep 20 12:21:08 2013
New Revision: 202775
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202775&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-20 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/58453
* tree-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58453
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
With -ftree-loop-distribution we fuse the first and the last partition
resulting in correct code again. We're really missing partition dependencies -
see PR53616.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58484
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
SUBROUTINE UMPSE(AIBJ,NOC,NDIM,NOCA,NVIRA,NOCCA,E2)
DIMENSION AIBJ(NOC,NDIM,*)
DO 20 MA=1,NVIRA
DO 20 MI=1,NOCA
DO 10 MB=1,MA
MBI = MI+NOCA*(MB-1)
DO 10 MJ=1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58484
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58484
Bug ID: 58484
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE in chrec_fold_plus_1, at
tree-chrec.c:272 building 416.gamess
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57850
Andrey Ponomarenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58483
--- Comment #2 from dennis luehring ---
i missed the commandline
g++-4.8 -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fdump-tree-optimized test.cpp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58482
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58483
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58483
Bug ID: 58483
Summary: missing optimization opportunity for const std::vector
compared to std::array
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: en
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58482
Bug ID: 58482
Summary: gomp4: user defined reduction produce wrong result
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58481
--- Comment #1 from Damian Kaczmarek ---
clang and VS2013 work properly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58099
--- Comment #20 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #19)
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_1.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
Here one gets:
ptr4 => cos
1
Error: Explicit interface required for '' at (1): elemental
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58099
--- Comment #19 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #18)
> This is avoided by the following improved patch (which just 'silently' sets
> the attributes):
That version still yields a good number of testsuite failures,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58481
Bug ID: 58481
Summary: Internal compiler error when passing argument packs to
base class method inside a lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, pa...@matos-sorge.com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
>
> --- Comment #6 from Paulo J. Matos ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
--- Comment #6 from Paulo J. Matos ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5)
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, pa...@matos-sorge.com wrote:
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
> >
> > --- Comment #4 from Paulo J. Matos ---
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58417
Bug 58417 depends on bug 58473, which changed state.
Bug 58473 Summary: [4.9 regression] FAIL:
ext/random/normal_mv_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58473
What|Remov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58473
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58473
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Sep 20 10:19:12 2013
New Revision: 202774
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202774&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-20 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/58473
* tree-chrec.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, pa...@matos-sorge.com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
>
> --- Comment #4 from Paulo J. Matos ---
> Backporting fixes the problem. Can we go ahead a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58480
Bug ID: 58480
Summary: Use attribute((nonnull)) to optimize callers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58099
--- Comment #18 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #17)
> (In reply to janus from comment #16)
> > TODO: Fix also the issue with PURE/ELEMENTAL reported in comment 14.
>
> Here is a small patch which does it:
This y
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
--- Comment #4 from Paulo J. Matos ---
Backporting fixes the problem. Can we go ahead and backport to 4.8?
Can we add the testcase to the testsuite as well please?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58471
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Can be fixed with this patch:
Index: gcc/fortran/primary.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/primary.c(revision 202765)
+++ gcc/fortran/primary
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58471
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
--- Comment #3 from Paulo J. Matos ---
Thanks Richard, will check.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58470
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
