https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17982
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64889
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64957
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64957
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 34682
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34682&action=edit
gcc5-pr64957.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64937
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64893
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26845
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64957
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
Mateusz Kwiatkowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.kwiatkowski at avsystem dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Does #c2 fix this, or is #c3 an unrelated bugreport that still needs fixing?
Problem is still seen after the fix. I put test here because of the same
symptom.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60956
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Feb 6 11:17:46 2015
New Revision: 220473
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220473&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/62631
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (get_shiftadd_cost):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64952
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60289
--- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Fri Feb 6 11:22:54 2015
New Revision: 220474
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220474&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/60289
Initial patch by Janus Weil
* resol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #22 from Eric Botcazou ---
OK, this is fixed on the SPARC, but not on the PA where we still have 2 IVs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #23 from Eric Botcazou ---
> OK, this is fixed on the SPARC, but not on the PA where we still have 2 IVs.
Correction: we have only one IV on the PA, but it's 'i' and not 'p'.
Dave, is the generated code optimimal on the PA or should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64957
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 6 11:36:34 2015
New Revision: 220475
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220475&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/64957
PR debug/64817
* simplify-rtx.c (sim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64817
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 6 11:36:34 2015
New Revision: 220475
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220475&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/64957
PR debug/64817
* simplify-rtx.c (si
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64958
Bug ID: 64958
Summary: Warn if INTENT(IN) is changed by passing to no-intent
argument
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64958
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |5.0
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64959
Bug ID: 64959
Summary: SFINAE in UDLs
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64896
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 34685
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34685&action=edit
gcc5-pr64896.patch
I think if !aggregate_value_p, we really should be using a temporary var rather
than RESULT_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64958
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
If this mechanism is in place, it could also be used to catch code like
call foo(a+1)
...
subroutine foo(a)
a = a + 1
end subroutine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64958
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Feb 6 13:55:42 2015
New Revision: 220477
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220477&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Revert the PR lto/64837 fix
It breaks gold:
% echo "int main () {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64960
Bug ID: 64960
Summary: Inefficient address pre-computation in PIC mode
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64958
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
If it is forbidden to modify an actual argument, we could make
a tempoary copy of that argument, pass that to a procedure where
it maches an intent(unknown) dummy argument, then do the comparison.
So, we wou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64961
Bug ID: 64961
Summary: nested template implementation crossing namespace
fails with access error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60956
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
For formatted, we already are parsing along the format string and we know when
its list directed, so I think we could either call fbuf_alloc with a flag or
call a different version of it that would auto flush
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64962
Bug ID: 64962
Summary: Use "nonnull"/"returns_nonnull" attribute annotation
for procedures (user code + libgfortran)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64889
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Feb 6 14:25:23 2015
New Revision: 220478
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220478&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64889
* config/h8300/h8300.c (push): New argument "in_pro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64889
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64257
--- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Feb 6 14:36:54 2015
New Revision: 220479
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220479&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix 404 in "Show Source" in jit docs
maintainer-scripts/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60956
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I have finished reviewing the code. We do have specific functions called for
list directed reads and writes where we know we will have no back and forth
tabbing issues, so we can use fixed length buffering f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35455
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #24 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-02-06 6:33 AM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
>
> --- Comment #23 from Eric Botcazou ---
>> OK, this is fixed on the SPARC, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
--- Comment #23 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #22)
> Trevor, seems I missed your patch. Sorry for that :(
> I committed the last part then and lets close the PR
>
> Thanks!
The testcase doesn't ICE an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64340
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64957
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32219
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64858
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25255
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64858
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Patch was already posted. It was approved by Jeff today.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64340
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Seems those option changes depend on parsing, so process_options is too
> early, so IMHO we need to recreate the optimization_{default,current}_node
> trees with the updated options (updating the options i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64256
--- Comment #10 from David Edelsohn ---
Stabstring continuations originally seem to have been disabled for AIX XCOFF
because the AIX assembler did not support them correctly. IBM's proprietary
compiler, VAC/XLC, directly generates object files a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26275
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53179
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64896
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hmm, OK, lets go for extra temporary and hope that copy propagation/NRV will do
the trick.
I wonder if we don't want to drop the extra alignment on x86_64 local vars.
Vectorizer knows how to upgrade and I doub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48009
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #10 from David Edel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54100
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46155
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53238
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47152
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64963
Bug ID: 64963
Summary: IPA Cloning/Splitting does not copy function section
attributes resulting in kernel miscompilation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64963
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64256
--- Comment #11 from Zoltan Hidvegi ---
Do you have more info regarding the AIX assembler bug you are referring to?
PR46072 was about a different assembler bug, it's just someone in that report
have also encountered the stabstring length issue. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64953
--- Comment #3 from manuel.reimer at gmx dot de ---
Thank you for your suggestion. This helped me to narrow this down to the
function "usbReset":
https://github.com/tormodvolden/maple-bootloader/blob/unify_platforms/usb.c#L258
If I use "-Os" on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64964
Bug ID: 64964
Summary: -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 passes incorrect length to _chk
functions in some cases
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64858
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Right, thanks for the notice. And, my debugging of this lead to quite similar
patch and that is pretty much what ipa-pure-const.c does too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Feb 6 18:15:01 2015
New Revision: 220482
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220482&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-06 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/63205
* gfortran.h: Add 'must
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64953
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Ok, thanks.
Now please attach the preprocessed source of that file (by adding
--save-temps to the compiler invocation). Also post the exact
command line you use to compile that file.
Maybe something o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64953
--- Comment #5 from manuel.reimer at gmx dot de ---
Created attachment 34690
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34690&action=edit
Preprocessed file for "usb.c"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64937
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 6 18:26:59 2015
New Revision: 220483
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220483&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/64937
* dwarf2out.c (set_block_abstract_flags, set_d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64953
--- Comment #6 from manuel.reimer at gmx dot de ---
The exact command line is:
arm-none-eabi-gcc -c -mthumb -mcpu=cortex-m3 -mthumb-interwork -I. -Os
-ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -Wall -Wimplicit -Wcast-align
-Wpointer-arith -Wswitch -Wre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64937
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39723
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48009
--- Comment #11 from Daniel Richard G. ---
Yep, that system's still running. I'll be happy to test any fixes for this
issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53238
--- Comment #22 from Daniel Richard G. ---
Still using AIX 4.3 here. The std::ctype error has been particularly
nettlesome, as it's beyond my ken and I can't work around it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64205
--- Comment #7 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Fri Feb 6 19:15:56 2015
New Revision: 220485
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220485&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2015-02-06 Michael Meissner
PR target/64205
* conf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64205
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
--- Comment #9 from M. Hanselmann ---
A few days ago I submitted a patch for this issue based on Dmitry's patch. It
seems as if we can get it in after the 5.0 release.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00027.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39714
Bug 39714 depends on bug 39722, which changed state.
Bug 39722 Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression][cond-optab] worse code with bitfields
on v850, mn10300, avr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39722
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39722
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63744
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44394
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39723
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64896
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 6 20:47:20 2015
New Revision: 220489
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220489&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/64896
* cgraphunit.c (cgraph_node::expand_thunk): If
re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64896
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64965
Bug ID: 64965
Summary: __FILE__ doesn't work if the filename contains newline
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61138
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> Likely r190641.
Yes
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #2)
> gfc_trans_pointer_assignment sets lse.descriptor_only before calling
> gfc_conv_expr_des
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64878
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Pop ---
Author: spop
Date: Fri Feb 6 21:08:13 2015
New Revision: 220491
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220491&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 64878: do not jump thread across more than one back-edge
2015-02-04 Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64878
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42522
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #17 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64257
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64752
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Feb 6 23:19:32 2015
New Revision: 220494
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220494&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/64752 - Rewrite jit testsuite to eliminate use of "file"
gcc/te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64752
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53119
Askar Safin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||safinaskar at mail dot ru
--- Comment #21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53119
--- Comment #22 from Rich Felker ---
The warning is probably correct for C++ because C++ has "{}" as its universal
zero initializer, and "{0}" may not (unsure about this; I'm not a C++ expert)
even be valid as an initializer for some C++ types. C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53119
--- Comment #23 from Askar Safin ---
Please remove {0} warning at least in cases where {0} is obviously OK (such as
addrinfo)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53348
--- Comment #8 from David Edelsohn ---
Patches are reviewed on gcc-patches mailinglist, not in Bugzilla
> The attached patch is everything I've got so far to address issues in
> building GCC on AIX 4.3. This covers issues beyond this bug report,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60956
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00449.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2714
--- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn ---
Author: dje
Date: Sat Feb 7 02:34:38 2015
New Revision: 220501
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220501&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/2714
PR bootstrap/64256
* xcoffout.h (DBX_C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64256
--- Comment #12 from David Edelsohn ---
Author: dje
Date: Sat Feb 7 02:34:38 2015
New Revision: 220501
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220501&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/2714
PR bootstrap/64256
* xcoffout.h (DBX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53348
--- Comment #9 from David Edelsohn ---
Author: dje
Date: Sat Feb 7 02:55:03 2015
New Revision: 220502
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220502&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/53348
* inclhack.def (aix_pthread): Accept tab
99 matches
Mail list logo
