https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94433
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #4)
> However I'm confused by the "can be declared with const [constParameter]"
> warnings in comment #0 - they look const to me. What are these messages
> trying to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789
--- Comment #34 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #29)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #28)
> > > Probably you can try to tweak it in ix86_add_stmt_cost? when the statement
> >
> > Yes, it's the place.
> >
> > > i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97206
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97235
Bug ID: 97235
Summary: ICE in duplicate, at ipa-prop.c:4251
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93176
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|bergner at gcc dot gnu.org |amodra at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97222
Richard Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97234
Bug ID: 97234
Summary: Constexpr class-scope array initializer referencing
previous elements
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64928
--- Comment #30 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu ---
I'm coming back to this project.
I naively thought "Well, I don't need arc profiling, I'll just set
-ftest-coverage without -fprofile-arcs" but it appears that I can't do that,
the gcda files
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94433
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #4 from David Malcol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97233
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97233
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01eabbeadb645959d5dcb0f00f41c3565a8f54f1
commit r11-3512-g01eabbeadb645959d5dcb0f00f41c3565a8f54f1
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97227
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97082
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97082
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f394e2d4c66678411c88b297f0db9a828214aef
commit r11-3507-g5f394e2d4c66678411c88b297f0db9a828214aef
Author: Ian Lance Taylor
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97227
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c363a4e044115ea811888fe0d32b04f23d79ae2
commit r11-3506-g7c363a4e044115ea811888fe0d32b04f23d79ae2
Author: Ian Lance Taylor
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94433
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-28
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94433
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
I use something like
cppcheck --enable=all --language=c++ trunk.git/gcc/analyzer/*.{h,cc}
This seems to work to me, although my copy of cppcheck is a hand
tweeked version of their development code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94433
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks for filing this. I've been attempting to reproduce this, but I'm not
getting any warnings out of cppcheck.
That said, looking at
git show
a96f1c38a787fbc847cb014d4b094e2787d539a7:gcc/analyzer/diagn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97217
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96229
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97230
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97233
Bug ID: 97233
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in deref_rvalue, at
analyzer/region-model.cc:1465
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78830
--- Comment #16 from Andrzej Krzemienski ---
Oh, I see. The above requirement applies only to chapter Algorithms library.
Not Iterators library. Sorry.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97217
--- Comment #4 from Carsten Schmidt ---
Sorry for the inconvenience!
o the exact version of GCC
o the system type
o the options given when GCC was configured/built
Please confer to file output.txt.
o the complete command line that trigge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97217
--- Comment #3 from Carsten Schmidt ---
Created attachment 49282
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49282&action=edit
Complete output of the compiler run; including version information.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97217
--- Comment #2 from Carsten Schmidt ---
Created attachment 49281
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49281&action=edit
The *.ii files generated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78830
--- Comment #15 from Andrzej Krzemienski ---
How come?
[algorithms.requirements], paragraph 4, bullet 5
(http://eel.is/c++draft/algorithms#requirements-4.5) says:
If an algorithm's template parameter is named BidirectionalIterator,
Bidirectiona
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78830
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
There is an LWG issue requesting clarification in the standard:
https://wg21.link/lwg3197
Option B is consistent with the interpretation of libstdc++ (and recent
versions of libc++). If Option A or C is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96390
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97123
Luke Hough changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dlhough at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97232
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
If you compile with -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS then there is a runtime check:
/home/jwakely/gcc/11/include/c++/11.0.0/bits/stl_iterator_base_funcs.h:151:
constexpr void std::__advance(_InputIterator&, _Distance
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #67 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c0817ceebffa0be66b39c874a5da408404330b42
commit r8-10546-gc0817ceebffa0be66b39c874a5da408404330b42
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #71 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3489c06cccb60c1af4c66aff82b670fb39f36266
commit r8-10550-g3489c06cccb60c1af4c66aff82b670fb39f36266
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #70 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:852423cd68b403d09a14f6436080243c609a57a8
commit r8-10549-g852423cd68b403d09a14f6436080243c609a57a8
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #68 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a45e419416c641b7be5d4f4eb877fa390349c004
commit r8-10547-ga45e419416c641b7be5d4f4eb877fa390349c004
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #66 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fd250940d0e3dd17302eb5e2653255c9189bfd70
commit r8-10545-gfd250940d0e3dd17302eb5e2653255c9189bfd70
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #72 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:768c95cc6c84d504cf95fe948d808376628d2fa8
commit r8-10551-g768c95cc6c84d504cf95fe948d808376628d2fa8
Author: Christophe Lyon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #69 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:99a8808add97c61b64a4cb979e4616731b86e58b
commit r8-10548-g99a8808add97c61b64a4cb979e4616731b86e58b
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #64 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c21a2f28014cd3bbfaee975a466dc3488052060
commit r8-10543-g3c21a2f28014cd3bbfaee975a466dc3488052060
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #65 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e9ed4afbb6778dedfb1efa0ba92429a51d4d049b
commit r8-10544-ge9ed4afbb6778dedfb1efa0ba92429a51d4d049b
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97232
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78830
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lesley at lesleylai dot info
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96390
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a10a2c0689db280ee3a94164504b7196b8370f4
commit r11-3505-g2a10a2c0689db280ee3a94164504b7196b8370f4
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97231
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-28
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97232
Bug ID: 97232
Summary: Iterator category of "std::prev" are not checked
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96344
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|3rdd case of|3rdd case of
|gnat.dg/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96229
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-28
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97231
--- Comment #1 from Hongyu Wang ---
Created attachment 49280
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49280&action=edit
A patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96840
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97231
Bug ID: 97231
Summary: Missing FSF copyright notes for some x86 intrinsic
headers
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97230
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #63 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3fa772a7acfea62a01fb36d1451c8be9c54ba7da
commit r9-8954-g3fa772a7acfea62a01fb36d1451c8be9c54ba7da
Author: Christophe Lyon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #62 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:803f597d3125bfd67d29a11c118e131353ee314e
commit r9-8953-g803f597d3125bfd67d29a11c118e131353ee314e
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #58 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f7c4bb47c97aa6cd68bd48f6f2129e19f01c892
commit r9-8949-g9f7c4bb47c97aa6cd68bd48f6f2129e19f01c892
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #61 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61291c4b7d429ddd12536732759bd56708e78e14
commit r9-8952-g61291c4b7d429ddd12536732759bd56708e78e14
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #57 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f189fa29bc90c658ce1df33774a04d4956dcc27
commit r9-8948-g6f189fa29bc90c658ce1df33774a04d4956dcc27
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #59 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d27e8eb8dc8ed28fdf4d6876d7f6f0610273198
commit r9-8950-g0d27e8eb8dc8ed28fdf4d6876d7f6f0610273198
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #60 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:23b4d65ef54b9ad8eb5cca65b7412d46f35d913f
commit r9-8951-g23b4d65ef54b9ad8eb5cca65b7412d46f35d913f
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #55 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:48e274be62b924379541ae0321b82862f572b973
commit r9-8946-g48e274be62b924379541ae0321b82862f572b973
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #56 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:11874a0d4033908e596181a17dab5444271f892b
commit r9-8947-g11874a0d4033908e596181a17dab5444271f892b
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96470
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97230
--- Comment #1 from Eligor Kadaf ---
Basically it described in 7th paragraph in [expr.const] of the latest C++
standard draft: https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.const#5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97230
Bug ID: 97230
Summary: Invocation of non-static member function on a null
instance in core constant expression should not be
allowed
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 09:48:13AM +, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
>
> Bug ID: 97224
>Summary: [8/9/10/11 Regression] SPEC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97070
--- Comment #3 from Ioannis E. Venetis ---
This is weird. Just downloaded gcc from git and built version 11.0
$ /home/venetis/apps/gcc-20200928/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/home/venetis/apps/gcc-20200928/bin/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97070
--- Comment #2 from Ioannis E. Venetis ---
Created attachment 49279
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49279&action=edit
GCC building script
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97094
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97229
Bug ID: 97229
Summary: pointer-compare sanitizer is very slow due to
__asan::IsAddressNearGlobal
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789
--- Comment #33 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #32)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #31)
> > (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #29)
> > > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #28)
> > > > > Probably you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97194
--- Comment #14 from Alexander Monakov ---
I see, there are more weaknesses than I thought. For CSE (or rather fwprop?) I
was thinking about a simpler case where the extracted-from value is loaded from
memory, but even in trivial cases RTL optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96919
Filip Puđak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||filip.pudak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97228
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon ---
It causes regressions in fortran too:
gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_bounds_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
-fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (internal compiler error)
gfortran.dg/assumed_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97228
Bug ID: 97228
Summary: [11 regression] New ICEs on arm since r11-3426
g:10843f8303509fcba880c6c05c08e4b4ccd24f36
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #51 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b9f76b95528775b3f09d151c56ff80747109498
commit r10-8813-g5b9f76b95528775b3f09d151c56ff80747109498
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #53 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:677f34508f1c8fba6a52c77f83eca08b6762ed28
commit r10-8815-g677f34508f1c8fba6a52c77f83eca08b6762ed28
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #54 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a6c47f4ce26639bfbc72821ae629b9af7744a9d7
commit r10-8816-ga6c47f4ce26639bfbc72821ae629b9af7744a9d7
Author: Christophe Lyo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #48 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:34db2d23439b39d2c7e5760f0f7de41f98b08c80
commit r10-8810-g34db2d23439b39d2c7e5760f0f7de41f98b08c80
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #50 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1c0679d6b5d12fb9d708442a8af725136a17f9cf
commit r10-8812-g1c0679d6b5d12fb9d708442a8af725136a17f9cf
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #52 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:858cfd55807883dfe1e051ad7d67d9c0449728f9
commit r10-8814-g858cfd55807883dfe1e051ad7d67d9c0449728f9
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #49 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bc04ceb7b94d9144ac923210f1affaa3dfed0725
commit r10-8811-gbc04ceb7b94d9144ac923210f1affaa3dfed0725
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #47 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8442a7c4c09375b76fa174313205fa7fcbfb016
commit r10-8809-gb8442a7c4c09375b76fa174313205fa7fcbfb016
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #46 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:117b23e43f765cadbf3ca4b80602dc158789675b
commit r10-8808-g117b23e43f765cadbf3ca4b80602dc158789675b
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789
--- Comment #32 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #31)
> (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #29)
> > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #28)
> > > > Probably you can try to tweak it in ix86_add_stmt_cost? when the
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97227
Bug ID: 97227
Summary: dsymutil runs on ELF execs during libbacktrace testing
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97226
Bug ID: 97226
Summary: ICE in gt_pch_note_object at ggc-common.c:276
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: pch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97194
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12)
> (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #11)
> > Yeah, for inserts such tactic would be inappropriate due to bad store
> > forwarding stalls anyway. As yo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97194
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #11)
> Yeah, for inserts such tactic would be inappropriate due to bad store
> forwarding stalls anyway. As you've shown in earlier comments, inserts have
> a ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97194
--- Comment #11 from Alexander Monakov ---
Yeah, for inserts such tactic would be inappropriate due to bad store
forwarding stalls anyway. As you've shown in earlier comments, inserts have a
very nice generic way to expand them (that does not tou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97225
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-28
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97194
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020, amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97194
>
> --- Comment #9 from Alexander Monakov ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93388
--- Comment #22 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #21)
> So given that the analyzer doesn't crash on the current Linux kernel code,
> does it do anything useful like find any bugs, perhaps ?
The snapshot I've ment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
--- Comment #5 from mark.eggleston at codethink dot co.uk ---
in progress...
On 28/09/2020 11:43, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97194
--- Comment #9 from Alexander Monakov ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> Note that currently RTL expansion forces a local vector typed variable
> to the stack (instead of allocating a pseudo) when there are
> variable-index access
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93388
--- Comment #21 from David Binderman ---
So given that the analyzer doesn't crash on the current Linux kernel code,
does it do anything useful like find any bugs, perhaps ?
Maybe gcc compiling itself with the analyzer might find some bugs, too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97225
Bug ID: 97225
Summary: Failure to optimize out conditional addition of zero
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93388
--- Comment #20 from Arseny Solokha ---
Using gcc-11.0.0-alpha20200927 snapshot I've just managed to build current
Linux master, configured w/ allyesconfig for x86_64, without ICEs, compile-time
hogs, or memory hogs in the analyzer for the first
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97195
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
Cheers, thanks Mark!
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
