http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53664
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-07-31
00:00:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 27901
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27901
Tentative patch.
Tentative patch - has a few unneeded whitespace changes but probably fixes t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53664
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-07-30
18:30:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Tests gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/neon/v*.c are generated by the script
> gcc/config/arm/neon-testgen.ml. 54 of these tests have duplicate
> scan-
||2012-07-24
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-07-24
13:03:00 UTC ---
on trunk with -O2 -g -gdwarf-3 I can reproduce the ICE .
{dw_attr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54051
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2
--- Comment #3 from Ramana R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54051
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-07-24
12:02:37 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue Jul 24 12:02:30 2012
New Revision: 189808
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189808
Log:
Fix PR target/54051
2012-07-24 Ramana R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54051
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54051
Bug #: 54051
Summary: Invalid alignment specifier generated for vld3_lane_*
and vld3_dup_* intrinsics.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53735
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|assemble-failure|
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53352
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||2012-07-12
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53859
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49891
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
--- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-07-05 16:56:23 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Jul 5 16:56:15 2012
New Revision: 189295
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189295
Log:
Correct bug number to PR target/48941
F
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51980
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-07-05
16:45:32 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Jul 5 16:45:18 2012
New Revision: 189294
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189294
Log:
2012-07-05 Ramana Radhakrishnan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49891
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-07-05
16:45:29 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Jul 5 16:45:18 2012
New Revision: 189294
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189294
Log:
2012-07-05 Ramana Radhakrishnan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #28 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-06-27 14:19:25 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Wed Jun 27 14:19:17 2012
New Revision: 189017
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189017
Log:
2012-06-27 Ramana Radhakrishnan
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46883
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53664
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-06-20
14:59:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Two scan-assembler directives with the same search string don't look for two
> instances of the same string, they just look for the same thing twice a
||2012-06-20
CC||jules at gcc dot gnu.org,
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-06-20
10:16:28 UTC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #27 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-06-15 16:43:44 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Fri Jun 15 16:43:36 2012
New Revision: 188671
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188671
Log:
2012-06-15 Marc Glisse
PR c++/510
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51509
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-06-15
00:51:26 UTC ---
With -fno-split-wide-types I can end up getting identical output to what is
expected in this case with FSF trunk. I suspect this might be another of those
costs with lower-subre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #26 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-06-14 11:22:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> (In reply to comment #21)
> > What does it mean "exercise the backend a lot"? Do you mean it takes a lot
> > of
> > time?
>
> I think so.
>
> > I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53558
Bug #: 53558
Summary: Register allocator doesn't tie return value register
to output variable.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
--- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-05-22 14:16:34 UTC ---
> There are still a few vmov's between Vector registers but I suspect that is
> because of the vcombine at the end for which RichardE might have something in
> flight.
This i
||2012-05-22
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53334
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-05-22
09:07:03 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue May 22 09:06:55 2012
New Revision: 187761
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187761
Log:
Fix PR target/53334
2012-05-22 Ramana Ra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53376
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-05-16
23:23:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > extern int x;
> > static long long p;
> > static long long *h1 ;
> > static long long *h2 ;
> >
> > void foo (void)
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53376
Bug #: 53376
Summary: Unrecognizable compare insn generated by movsicc in
arm backend.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52989
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52804
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||2012-05-14
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-05-14
11:42:53 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk so far. Any plans of backporting this to 4.7 branch
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-05-14
11:40:08 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk by
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-05/msg00325
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53278
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-05-08
14:56:18 UTC ---
The patch below appears to trigger the issue but there's a fundamental question
as to why lower-subreg generates concatns when the documentation suggests that
concat and concatn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53278
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24234|0 |1
is obsolete|
|unassigned at gcc dot |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52800
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-03-30
23:34:41 UTC ---
Richi - probably yours -
svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@185913 broken
svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@185910 good
regards,
Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52800
Bug #: 52800
Summary: eglibc build broken with internal compiler error in
cfgloop .
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51980
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-03-30
08:17:21 UTC ---
Experimenting with :
Applying the patch of PR48941 and the patch for lower-subreg here
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-03/msg01886.html
I now see : We still have too
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51980
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-03-30
07:58:49 UTC ---
Your testcase is broken - it doesn't honour reinterpret_casts properly . This
is a better testcase.
#include
uint32x4_t sqrlen4D_16u8( const uint8x16_t A, const uint8x16_t
||2012-02-29
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-02-29
11:43:31 UTC ---
We manage to hoist this at O2 but not at Os in 4.7 while 4.6 appears to
||2012-02-29
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.7.0
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-02-29
11:41:00 UTC ---
Confirmed - looks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785
--- Comment #14 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-02-28 16:09:52 UTC ---
I can confirm that a build for arm-linux-gnueabi completes and do some
cross-testing on qemu if that's deemed to be enough.
Any other ideas for testing.
Ramana
Here's a sug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-02-24
12:24:04 UTC ---
Trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51835
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||2012-02-23
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-02-23
02:24:10 UTC ---
I suppose confirmed :)
||2012-02-23
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||4.7.0
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.6.3
--- Comment #4 from Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50313
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50313
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-01-30
14:35:10 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Mon Jan 30 14:35:05 2012
New Revision: 183727
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183727
Log:
Fix PR target/50313
2012-01-30 Ramana R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
--- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-01-27
16:20:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Any chance of seeing the work on this restart ?
>
> I found this bug while looking for something that would help (I raised bug
> 51980 for the same k
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51980
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Ta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51985
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
--- Comment #20 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-01-25 08:52:43 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Wed Jan 25 08:52:39 2012
New Revision: 183512
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183512
Log:
2012-01-25 Ramana Radhakrishnan
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45416
--- Comment #16 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-01-23 17:59:56 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Mon Jan 23 17:59:51 2012
New Revision: 183446
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183446
Log:
2012-01-23 Ramana Radhakrishnan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51642
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||2012-01-21
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51882
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-01-21
12:29:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 26403
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26403
reduced testcase
Reduced testcase.
Configured with :
--target=arm-linux-gnueabi --with-c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51819
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51819
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-01-20
13:24:53 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Fri Jan 20 13:24:47 2012
New Revision: 183338
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183338
Log:
Fix PR target/51819
Modified:
trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51819
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51914
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-01-20
09:50:52 UTC ---
arch specific command line options used:
-mcpu=cortex-a9 -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51914
Bug #: 51914
Summary: [4.7] All vect-intfloat-conversion tests fail for
arm-linux-gnueabi
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50313
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-01-20
09:22:21 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Fri Jan 20 09:22:14 2012
New Revision: 183328
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183328
Log:
Fix PR target/50313
Modified:
trunk/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51835
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51876
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-01-19
15:40:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I did, but I'm waiting for testing results from Ramana.
Testresults look good. Yeah , ok.
Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51178
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-none-eabi |arm-none-eabi,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51876
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-01-17
13:48:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created attachment 26349 [details]
> gcc47-pr51876.patch
>
> Untested fix (well, tested that the ICEs are gone on all these tests with a
> cross). v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51876
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51876
Bug #: 51876
Summary: [4.7 regression] Recent extra neon related testsuite
regressions on arm-linux-gnueabi
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2012-01-13
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Version|4.6.1 |4.7.0
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Severity
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50313
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-01-13
12:06:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 26314
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26314
smaller testcase
Better reduced testcase. Fails on trunk with -Os -fPIC -mcpu=arm9tdmi or -Os
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50313
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
--- Comment #19 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-01-13 09:07:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Note, can't be reproduced on the trunk, the strcmp isn't DCEd there, but guess
> the problem is just latent there.
Latent still in trunk with the t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
--- Comment #18 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-01-11 18:15:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Note, can't be reproduced on the trunk, the strcmp isn't DCEd there, but guess
> the problem is just latent there.
>
> It looks like a target bug t
||2012-01-11
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-01-11
14:51:37 UTC ---
Completely untested but I think this is the correct fix for this
||4.6.0
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed||2012-01-11
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Summary
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2012-01-11
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51381
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.3
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-01-11
12:12:07 UTC ---
This should now be fixed by the commit as indicated below
||missed-optimization
Last reconfirmed||2012-01-11
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #62 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-01-09 16:55:24 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Mon Jan 9 16:55:16 2012
New Revision: 183019
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183019
Log:
2012-01-09 Ramana Radhakrishnan
B
,
||arm-linux-gnueabi
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords||missed-optimization
Last reconfirmed||2011-12-12
CC||ramana at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51381
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45012
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45102
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||4.6.0, 4.7.0
Known to fail||4.5.0
--- Comment #10 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-11-16 13:41:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Correct patch (h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51122
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51122
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51068
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51051
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael.hope at linaro dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51068
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50968
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
--- Comment #13 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-11-02 11:40:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Please tell me this bug is fixed in gcc 4.6.2 release? If this is fixed in
> gcc4.6.2 release can I use the fix patch into gcc 4.6-linaro?
>
> Than
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50886
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50878
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-10-27
16:56:38 UTC ---
I see this with 180560 FYI.
Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50878
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-10-27
16:38:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 25635
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25635
testcase
bzipped testcase.
901 - 1000 of 1217 matches
Mail list logo
