On 11/13/2011 04:18 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
The snippet below was written when a new major release of FreeBSD
would happen every couple of years, not as frequently as recently
the case. FreeBSD 1.x and 2.x, and a.out support, have been obsolete
for what must be a decade or so, yet the regular
Iain,
This probably qualifies as obvious - but having discussed some of the
background with Mike ..
.. there are other ways of solving the problem - although probably rather
heavy-weight for this problem.
.. So, I'll let him have the say...
OK for trunk?
Iain
testsuite:
PR
Hi,
Daniel noticed that in cmath we have functions marked constexpr which
aren't really viable anyway due to the pointer parameter. Seems
basically harmless given our way to deal with these matters, but I agree
can be misleading. Tested x86_64-linux, committed.
Paolo.
Hi Rainer,
On 14 Nov 2011, at 09:50, Rainer Orth wrote:
+/* { dg-options -O2 -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage -
flat_namespace -
undefined suppress { target *-*-darwin* } } */
/* { dg-require-weak } */
I'd prefer if you'd use the new dg-additional-options instead of
duplicating the complete
Richard,
This patch fixes the slow down in the compilation of 20001226-1.c caused by
-ftree-tail-merge.
-ftree-tree-tail-merge removes half of the 16000 basic blocks, but increases
compilation time with a factor 2.4 from 34 seconds to 80 seconds (not counting
the further increase of 46 seconds
From: Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:51:56 +0100
On 11/11/11 20:13, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
AFAICT, your patch has got sufficiently testing now (on three
targets to boot) to be considered safe to check in. Or is
something amiss?
(If it's the
... probably here. Though I'd also approve a patch that simply removes
the ggc_collect call (and the nested parameter). Honza - you probably
added the ggc_collect - what's the reason to do it in this lowlevel place?
The ggc_collect was always here. Before unit-at-a-time we used to run
Here is the revised patch. Bootstrap and regression tested on linux/x86-64.
Honza, can you comment on the implication of this change?
Well, as I explained in previous email, this was traditinal place where
frontends collect garbage while parsing, so you would need to verify that all
the
Someone with approval rights: pretty please?
Can I add my +1 pretty please as well here :) ? According to #c3
this fixes arm-linux-gnueabi cross-builds for C++ as well and
potentially allows this to bootstrap again. I have kicked off a
bootstrap and test run on arm-linux-gnueabi .
cheers
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org writes:
Someone with approval rights: pretty please?
Can I add my +1 pretty please as well here :) ? According to #c3
this fixes arm-linux-gnueabi cross-builds for C++ as well and
potentially allows this to bootstrap again. I have kicked
Hi,
this fixes bootstrap failure for Windows targets due recent change in gcov.c.
2011-11-14 Kai Tietz kti...@redhat.com
* gcov.c (generate_results): Add missing semicolon and
correct indent.
Committed at revision 181353.
Regards,
Kai
Index: gcov.c
Ok for google/main after compiler bootstrap and regression test
(without ftsan), and some large tests with tsan turned on (as many as
you can but at your discretion).
David
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 11:59 PM, dvyu...@google.com wrote:
On 2011/11/11 00:00:35, davidxl wrote:
Have you run through
This patch is an enhanced variant of -H. It prints more information about
the included files. I'm using it as input to a tool to automatically
generate PPH mappings for large TUs.
I don't think this will survive for long, but it is useful for now.
Tested on x86_64. Committed to branch.
Hi,
the patch is OK. Thanks!
Honza
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
this is hopefully final variant of patch. The epilogue code was broken in some
scenarios for memset, but should work safely now. I also fixed the tables for
core/buldozer/amdfam10 chips.
But before it can be comitted, we
Hi,
a problem in postreload causes a miscompilation of libgomp on s390x.
insn 1: r1 = r1 + r2
insn 2: r3 = r1
insn 3: unspec_volatile
insn 4: use r1
With the patch from http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452
the regstate information is resetted at the unspec_volatile instead of
Hi,
emutls is creating variables late that confuses varpool since
varpool_finalize_decl is supposed to be used only before cgraph construction.
This patch fixes the problem by introducing varpool_add_new_variable
that works same as cgraph_add_new_function (i.e. allows middle-end/back-end
to
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
this is hopefully final variant of patch. The epilogue code was broken in
some
scenarios for memset, but should work safely now. I also fixed the tables
for
core/buldozer/amdfam10 chips.
But before it can be
On 11/14/2011 04:10 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Looks like all we need is a positive review of
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01409.html and a
ChangeLog entry to unbreak three or more targets.
Someone with approval rights: pretty please?
That patch is ok.
r~
Looks good; I fixed a few whitespace and formatting issues and checked
in the patch. Thanks a lot!
Jason
On 11 November 2011 23:32, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
Cc: Richard Earnshaw richard.earns...@arm.com
Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrish...@arm.com
---
gcc/config/arm/arm.c | 4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
Hi,
ilp32 includes both x32 and ia32. -march=i486 only applies to ia32.
I checked in this patch to check ia32 instead of ilp32.
H.J.
---
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog (revision 181359)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3
On 11/14/2011 08:08 AM, David Gilbert wrote:
There is unfortunately no guarantee that your kernel has support for the 64bit
cases, since this was only recently added - and the libgcc code checks
and aborts if linked in.
(As far as I can tell there is approximately one potential user of 64bit
There is unfortunately no guarantee that your kernel has support for the 64bit
cases, since this was only recently added - and the libgcc code checks
and aborts if linked in.
I don't see how this patch will change status-quo.
Richard: I've not been able to test the patch yet given that trunk
Hello!
Currently, gcc vectorizes {floor,ceil,round}{,f}, but not i.e. (int)
floor [and other rounding functions] due to conversion of (int) floor
- ifloor that inhibits vectorization.
Attached patch introduces new expanders that handle
rounding+conversions with expansion to
On Nov 13, 2011, at 1:32 PM, Iain Sandoe develo...@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk
wrote:
we have a problem on powerpc-darwin9
OK for trunk?
Ok, please. Include a comment line just before staying why.
On 11/14/2011 01:18 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 11/14/2011 08:08 AM, David Gilbert wrote:
Andrew, what's the state of discussion on the atomics library? While I
understand that vendors want to be able to replace that library, and thus we
want to settle on a standard ABI, I think *not*
Hi guys,
These are couple of patches for Graphite-OpenCL.
First patch fixes lack of MINUS_EXPR processing in OpenCL kernel code
generation.
The second one fixed VEC related issue, which caused ISE on some tests
from NPB (NASA parallel benchmark).
ChangeLogs:
[1]
*
This breaks the mingw64 build with S_ISLNK being unresolved.
Since windows doesn't know anything about symbolic links, could
something like this help?
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/xm-mingw32.h b/gcc/config/i386/xm-mingw32.h
index e0dd3f3..34663ac 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/xm-mingw32.h
+++
On 11/14/11 19:51, Alen Skondro wrote:
This breaks the mingw64 build with S_ISLNK being unresolved.
Since windows doesn't know anything about symbolic links, could
something like this help?
thanks, Joseph also pointed this out to me. I have a slightly different patch
in testing (posix
Denis Chertykov wrote:
Let's wait for
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01874.html
As that patch is now upstream, here the updated version.
Difference to the prior implementation of AS1 is:
o If no LPMX instruction is available and more than 2 bytes
have to be loaded, a libgcc
Hello!
2011-11-14 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* gcc.target/i386/avx-recip-vec.c: New test.
* gcc.target/i386/avx-lrintf-vec.c: Ditto.
* gcc.target/i386/avx-lrint-vec.c: Ditto.
* gcc.target/i386/avx-ceilf-vec.c: Include sse4_1-ceilf-vec.c.
*
V2 is simpler, than
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01335.html
because (using the approach suggested by Joseph) we can initialize
flag_next_runtime early enough to avoid having to deal with any other
flags.
[I'll still get rid of the flag_objc_sjlj_exceptions flag in a
2011/11/14 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
this is hopefully final variant of patch. The epilogue code was broken in
some
scenarios for memset, but should work safely now. I also fixed the tables
for
On 14 Nov 2011, at 20:36, H.J. Lu wrote:
2011/11/14 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
this is hopefully final variant of patch. The epilogue code was
broken in some
scenarios for memset, but should work safely now. I also
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
Richard,
This patch fixes the slow down in the compilation of 20001226-1.c caused by
-ftree-tail-merge.
-ftree-tree-tail-merge removes half of the 16000 basic blocks, but increases
compilation time with a factor 2.4
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Iain Sandoe
develo...@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk wrote:
On 14 Nov 2011, at 20:36, H.J. Lu wrote:
2011/11/14 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
this is hopefully final variant of patch. The
Hi,
2011-11-14 Zolotukhin Michael michael.v.zolotuk...@gmail.com
Jan Hubicka j...@suse.cz
Zolotukhin Michael works for Intel and has copyright assignment with FSF.
Looks like we have a bootstrap issue, thus sorry if may message may appear
stupid nitpicking: why Zolotukhin
From: Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:43:30 +0100
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
This patch fixes the slow down in the compilation of 20001226-1.c caused by
-ftree-tail-merge.
...
ok for trunk?
Ok.
Tom,
On 14 Nov 2011, at 20:44, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Iain Sandoe
develo...@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk wrote:
On 14 Nov 2011, at 20:36, H.J. Lu wrote:
2011/11/14 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz
wrote:
Hi,
this
I've committed this to fix windows and other non-modern posix systems.
nathan
2011-11-14 Nathan Sidwell nat...@acm.org
* gcov.c (canonicalize_name): Protect use of S_ISLNK.
Index: gcov.c
===
--- gcov.c (revision
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
There are a couple of instances in which the paper doesn't cover the
handling of memory_model_consume, and I made a best guess. These
are indicated by /* ??? */ markers. I would be obliged if someone
could verify
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 07:48:03AM -1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 11/14/2011 04:10 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Looks like all we need is a positive review of
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01409.html and a
ChangeLog entry to unbreak three or more targets.
Someone
This patch propagates visibility information in the same way that weakness is
for externally visible coverage objects. I don't know whether this will fix the
reported firefox build failure -- can you try? Even if it doesn't, I'm pretty
sure it's an improvement, but I'll leave it for comment
This patch to the Go library uses some of the runtime.c file from the 6g
compiler. This is to make it easier to merge changes to the scheduler.
There are no functional changes with this patch. Bootstrapped and ran
Go testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Committed to mainline.
Ian
diff -r
On 2011.11.14 at 21:59 +, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
This patch propagates visibility information in the same way that weakness is
for externally visible coverage objects. I don't know whether this will fix
the
reported firefox build failure -- can you try?
The patch doesn't help
This patch fixes parsing of transaction expressions, so that two txn
expressions that are part of a single expression do not get treated as
nested txns anymore, but become two separate ones (see test case).
This was approved off-line by Richard Henderson for the trans-mem branch
and posted before
On 11/14/2011 12:41 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
Require parentheses when parsing transaction expressions.
gcc/
* c-parser.c (c_parser_transaction_expression): Require parentheses
when parsing transaction expressions.
gcc/cp/
* parser.c
bootstrap completed on i686-darwin9, so I've applied the following as
requested,
Thank you and my apologizes for the breakage!
Honza
Iain
gcc:
2011-11-14 Jan Hubicka j...@suse.cz
* config/i386/i386.c (core cost model): Correct pasto.
ndex: gcc/config/i386/i386.c
From: Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:48:03 +0100
On 11/14/2011 04:10 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Looks like all we need is a positive review of
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01409.html and a
ChangeLog entry to unbreak three or more targets.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
this is hopefully final variant of patch. The epilogue code was broken in some
scenarios for memset, but should work safely now. I also fixed the tables for
core/buldozer/amdfam10 chips.
But before it can be comitted, we
On 11/14/2011 11:56 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 07:48:03AM -1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 11/14/2011 04:10 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Looks like all we need is a positive review of
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01409.html and a
ChangeLog entry to
On 11/14/2011 11:46 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
There are a couple of instances in which the paper doesn't cover the
handling of memory_model_consume, and I made a best guess. These
are indicated by /* ??? */ markers.
On 11/15/11 01:43, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 11/14/2011 11:56 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
* function.c (thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns): Guard
emitting return with single_succ_p test.
Hmm. This looks plausible too.
Bernd's patch made sure that cfglayout didn't do something
From: Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:54:34 +0100
On 11/15/11 01:43, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 11/14/2011 11:56 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
* function.c (thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns): Guard
emitting return with single_succ_p test.
Hmm. This looks
With this patch DW_LNS_set_basic_block opcodes are emitted in the .debug_line
section marking the instructions that indicate the beginning of a basic block
as specified by the dwarf standards 2,3 and 4.
Tested on x86_64-linux also against gdb's 7.3.1 testsuite.
r
gcc/Changelog:
2011-11-14
I figured I'd make the POWER7 donation to the GCC Compile Farm a
news item. Hint to everyone else: donate, and I'll be happy to
add an entry as well. :-)
Installed.
Gerald
Index: index.html
===
RCS file:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK for trunk?
* doc/contrib.texi: Add entry for David Binderman.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
On 11/14/11 22:33, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2011.11.14 at 21:59 +, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
This patch propagates visibility information in the same way that weakness is
for externally visible coverage objects. I don't know whether this will fix the
reported firefox build failure -- can
Hello,
On 26.10.2011 21:11, Alexander Monakov wrote:
Hello,
This patch series implements predication support for the selective scheduler.
It is implemented as a transformation similar to speculative execution, but
simpler in some aspects (e.g. does not require recovery code). On ia64,
Hello,
On 26.10.2011 21:26, Alexander Monakov wrote:
(Note, this is a prerequisite for predication support but also is an
improvement on its own. This patch can be installed separately.)
...
diff --git a/gcc/sel-sched.c b/gcc/sel-sched.c
index f11faca..91fb0fe 100644
---
From: Anatoly Sokolov ae...@post.ru
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 22:42:53 +0100
Regression tested on cris-axis-elf.
OK to install?
* config/cris/cris.c (cris_function_value_regno_p): Make static.
(TARGET_FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P): Define.
* config/cris/cris.h
On 2011.11.15 at 07:09 +, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 11/14/11 22:33, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2011.11.14 at 21:59 +, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
This patch propagates visibility information in the same way that weakness
is
for externally visible coverage objects. I don't know
63 matches
Mail list logo
