The patch for PR 51972 fixed some issues with intrinsic assignment,
which involved polymorphic components.
However, I couldn't check the correctness in some cases as I run ICEs.
Those were fixed by Mikael's recent patch (cf. PR 51754 et alia).
The committed (Rev. ) and attached patch adds
Hello world,
the attached, rather obvious patch fixed a bogus unused parameter
warning with procedure dummy arguments and warns about these if
they occur.
Regression-tested. OK for trunk? Or rather wait until 4.8?
Thomas
2012-02-05 Thomas König tkoe...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Swedish team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/sv.po
(This file, 'gcc-4.7-b20120128.sv.po',
Hi,
the library bits seem straightforward enough to go in now. Of course the
substantive issue seems C++ front end diagnostics, post 4.7.0 material.
Sanity checked x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
///
2012-02-05 Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@gcc.gnu.org
Paolo Carlini
Hi,
This patch adds a support of pattern recognition in basic block SLP.
Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64-suse-linux.
Ira
ChangeLog:
* tree-vectorizer.h (vect_pattern_recog): Add new argument.
* tree-vect-loop.c (vect_analyze_loop_2): Update call to
On 4 February 2012 23:35, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
For what it's worth, I strongly suggest that you only define those when
__cpluplus is pre-C++11.
There is simply too much software out there which will run into this
Really? Why would any C++ code assume bool is defined as a macro?
It's been a
On 23 December 2011 17:33, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This modifies the test to PASS when the expected type of exception is
caught, instead of being XFAIL due to uncaught exception.
Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk.
* testsuite/tr1/2_general_utilities/shared_ptr/cons/
Plain MIPS I testing on mips-elf has quite a few atomic-related failures,
due to the lack of LL and SC. Fixed as below.
Tested on mips-elf, mips64-linux-gnu, and a host of others. Applied.
Richard
gcc/testsuite/
* lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_mips_llsc): New.
gcc.dg/pr48774.c fails on MIPS REL targets because of an orphaned
HI16 relocation; see PR 52125 for details. This isn't a regression,
so I'm just going to XFAIL it for now.
Tested on mips64-linux-gnu and various *-elf targets. Applied.
Richard
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/52125
*
Although I changed non-MIPS16 code to allow larger inline copies:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg00053.html
MIPS16 code is still for now expected to use memcpy. This patch
adjusts the testsuite accordingly.
Tested on mips64-linux-gnu and various ELF targets. Applied.
Richard
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
Maciej W. Rozycki ma...@codesourcery.com writes:
If there's still some concern that __mips16_rdhwr might not have
the right ABI, then maybe we should simply emit a link-once function
in each object that needs it. We could then switch to
gcc.dg/fixed-point/convert.c and libgomp.fortran/vla3.f90 were failing
on MIPS16 for mips64-linux-gnu with PLTs enabled because we were
underestimating the length of a direct JAL.
Tested on mips64-linux-gnu and various ELF targets. Applied.
Richard
gcc/
* config/mips/mips.md
I've committed this patch to describe the MIPS changes in GCC 4.7.
Corrections, comments, and help with wordsmithing are all welcome.
Thanks,
Richard
Index: htdocs/gcc-4.7/changes.html
===
RCS file:
Hello!
Attached patch enables post-reload compare optimization pass for x86 targets.
As shown in following test, patch removes redundant compare:
--cut here--
int test(int a, int b)
{
int lt = a b;
int eq = a == b;
if (lt)
return 1;
return eq;
}
--cut here--
gcc -O2 on x86_64, a
It has been brought to my attention that we have been missing
a prominent member of the Steering Committee on our web page.
Fixed thusly.
Gerald
Index: steering.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/steering.html,v
retrieving
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
2012-02-05 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
PR target/28685
* config/i386/i386.c (TARGET_FLAGS_REGNUM): New.
Hmm, how is this (apparently new in 2011) TARGET_FLAGS_REGNUM
different from the older
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+liRichard Stallmann (Free Software Foundation)/li
s/Stallmann/Stallman
Oops, of course! Too much German recently. :-o
Thanks, Paolo. Fixed right away.
Gerald
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
PR target/28685
* config/i386/i386.c (TARGET_FLAGS_REGNUM): New.
Hmm, how is this (apparently new in 2011) TARGET_FLAGS_REGNUM
different from the older targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs?
This is how
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
I've committed this patch to describe the MIPS changes in GCC 4.7.
Corrections, comments, and help with wordsmithing are all welcome.
Thanks,
Richard
Index: htdocs/gcc-4.7/changes.html
Committed as revision 183915 after green light from Tobias on #gfortran.
2012-02-05 Paul Thomas pa...@gcc.gnu.org
* trans-array.c (gfc_array_allocate): Zero memory for all class
array allocations.
* trans-stmt.c (gfc_trans_allocate): Ditto for class scalars.
PR
Hi Steve,
You need a space after TREE_NO_WARNING. I think that the
patch can be applied now given its simplicity.
Committed as rev. 183916 with the space.
Thanks a lot for the review!
Thomas
PRs libstdc++/51296 and libstdc++/51906 are both caused by problems
with the Pthreads static initializer macros such as
PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER.
On Tru64 PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER and PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER can
only be used for statically-initialized variables, as allowed by POSIX
currently,
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
It has been brought to my attention that we have been missing
a prominent member of the Steering Committee on our web page.
Should the list distinguish which members are or are not GNU maintainers
of GCC? fencepost:/gd/gnuorg/maintainers lists only
Hello world,
I added the attached test case from the PR after verifying that all
loops mentioned in the PR are now vectorized. The PR is now closed.
2012-02-05 Thomas König tkoe...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran/32373
* gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90: New test case.
! PR fortran/32373
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the German team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/de.po
(This file, 'gcc-4.7-b20120128.de.po',
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 08:26:22PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
PRs libstdc++/51296 and libstdc++/51906 are both caused by problems
with the Pthreads static initializer macros such as
PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER.
On Tru64 PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER and PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER can
only be
On 5 February 2012 23:53, Jack Howarth wrote:
There are no unexpected libstdc++ testsuite regressions on
x86_64-apple-darwin11 with this
patch applied to current gcc trunk.
Thanks, Jack. If I can't get approval for the change I'll workaround
it in libstdc++, but IMHO it would be cleaner to
The out-of-line destructor in future.cc uses std::call_once which uses
a lambda on TLS targets. Because we compile with
-fno-implicit-templates an explicit instantiation is needed, but can't
be done because the closure type created by the lambda can't be named.
This puts the destructor inline in
PR c++/48680
* doc/invoke.texi (C++ Dialect Options): Use @option markup for
-Weffc++ and specify guidelines come from second edition.
Tested with 'make doc html'
OK for trunk?
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 6105710..6c61e53 100644
---
On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
PR c++/48680
* doc/invoke.texi (C++ Dialect Options): Use @option markup for
-Weffc++ and specify guidelines come from second edition.
Tested with 'make doc html'
OK for trunk?
Yes. The first is a bug fix, the second
On 6 February 2012 01:04, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
PR c++/48680
* doc/invoke.texi (C++ Dialect Options): Use @option markup for
-Weffc++ and specify guidelines come from second edition.
Tested with 'make doc html'
OK for trunk?
OK.
Jason
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 08:26:22PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This has been testing on darwin, if Rainer tests it successfully on
Tru64 will the gthr-posix.h change be acceptable?
Ok with a suitable ChangeLog entry.
diff --git a/libgcc/gthr-posix.h b/libgcc/gthr-posix.h
index
33 matches
Mail list logo
