Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org writes:
domi...@lps.ens.fr (Dominique Dhumieres) writes:
Here it is. Committed as r218662 to get things going again.
The same change should be done for libitm and libatomic.
And boehm-gc.
Right, fixed as follows and installed on mainline after testing
On 18/12/14 09:43, Rainer Orth wrote:
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org writes:
domi...@lps.ens.fr (Dominique Dhumieres) writes:
Here it is. Committed as r218662 to get things going again.
The same change should be done for libitm and libatomic.
And boehm-gc.
Right, fixed as follows
Hi Kyrill,
Sorry about this.
I had grepped for includes of gcc-defs.exp in lib*, which missed boehm-gc.
Thanks for fixing this, I was away earlier this week.
I'll make sure to check the libraries explicitly if I do any testsuite
refactoring work in the future
great, thanks. I know all too
Currently, the new gcc.dg/lto/chkp-privatize test FAILs on Solaris/x86
with gas and ld for 64-bit:
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/chkp-privatize
c_lto_chkp-privatize_0.o-c_lto_chkp-privatize_1.o execute -fPIC -flto
-flto-partition=max -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/chkp-privatize
Hi,
This patch contains Marvell Whitney core's pipeline description.
Test on arm-linux-gnueabi and no new regression are found.
Is it OK for trunk?
Regards,
Xingxing
2014-12-18 Xingxing Pan xxing...@marvell.com
* config/arm/arm-cores.def: Add new core marvell-whitney.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:48:01PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
I have another suggestion: on gomp-4_0-branch, we had already started
using a libgomp-test-support.exp file for a similar purpose. I now
changed your code on gomp-4_0-branch in r218845 as follows (though, not
very much tested).
Hi!
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:09:49 +0100, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 05:59:11PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
--- gcc/builtins.c
+++ gcc/builtins.c
+/* Expand OpenACC acc_on_device.
+
+ This has to happen late (that is, not in early folding;
Hi Jakub!
Many thanks for the review comments! The very most have been addresed,
here are just a few comments. If you feel strongly/differently about
any, I'll address those, too.
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:09:49 +0100, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 05:59:11PM
Hi,
On 12/17/2014 09:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
I'm uncomfortable with setting TREE_NO_WARNING on a decl just because
we don't want a warning for one particular use of it. How about
suppressing warnings across the call to build_static_cast?
Sure. The below uses the
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Rainer Orth
r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Currently, the new gcc.dg/lto/chkp-privatize test FAILs on Solaris/x86
with gas and ld for 64-bit:
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/chkp-privatize
c_lto_chkp-privatize_0.o-c_lto_chkp-privatize_1.o execute -fPIC -flto
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:46:00AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
just
rtx v1 = GEN_INT (...);
rtx v2 = GEN_INT (...);
machine_mode mode = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (arg));
rtx ret = gen_reg_rtx (TYPE_MODE (integer_type_node));
emit_move_insn (ret, const0_rtx);
rtx_code_label
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:07:01PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
- case GF_OMP_FOR_KIND_SIMD:
- kind = simd;
- break;
- case GF_OMP_FOR_KIND_CILKSIMD:
- kind = cilksimd;
- break;
case GF_OMP_FOR_KIND_DISTRIBUTE:
kind = distribute;
break;
case
On 17/12/14 00:04, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, James Greenhalgh wrote:
@@ -22792,6 +22792,12 @@ vsqrtq_f32 (float32x4_t a)
return __builtin_aarch64_sqrtv4sf (a);
}
+__extension__ static __inline float64x1_t __attribute__ ((__always_inline__))
+vsqrt_f64 (float64x1_t a)
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:38:53PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
So, is what is on the gomp-4_0-branch now all that you'd like to merge to
trunk now? Has it been tested on nvptx? I guess we should test it with
XeonPhi offloading too to make sure it doesn't break.
And then you or together with
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 06:58:47PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
-fsanitize=float-cast-overflow sanitization is done in convert.c and calls
there save_expr. Unfortunately, save_expr is a no-go for the C FE, we need
c_save_expr, but as
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:02:22PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:38:53PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
So, is what is on the gomp-4_0-branch now all that you'd like to merge to
trunk now? Has it been tested on nvptx? I guess we should test it with
XeonPhi offloading
Hi Jakub!
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:15:38 +0100, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:02:22PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:38:53PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
So, is what is on the gomp-4_0-branch now all that you'd like to merge to
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:24:20PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi Jakub!
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:15:38 +0100, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:02:22PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:38:53PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
So, is
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:31:45PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
--- gcc/config.gcc
+++ gcc/config.gcc
@@ -2906,6 +2906,7 @@ esac
case ${target} in
*-intelmic-* | *-intelmicemul-*)
tmake_file=${tmake_file} i386/t-intelmic
+ tm_file=${tm_file} i386/intelmic-offload.h
;;
The Linux kernel never passes floating point arguments around, vararg
functions or not. Hence no vector registers are ever used when calling a
vararg function. But gcc still dutifully emits an xor %eax,%eax before
each and every call of a vararg function. Since no callee use that for
anything,
Hi Jakub!
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:33:11 +0100, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:46:00AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
just
rtx v1 = GEN_INT (...);
rtx v2 = GEN_INT (...);
machine_mode mode = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (arg));
rtx ret = gen_reg_rtx
Hi Jakub!
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:36:16 +0100, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:31:45PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
--- gcc/config.gcc
+++ gcc/config.gcc
@@ -2906,6 +2906,7 @@ esac
case ${target} in
*-intelmic-* | *-intelmicemul-*)
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:11 PM, H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com wrote:
The Linux kernel never passes floating point arguments around, vararg
functions or not. Hence no vector registers are ever used when calling a
vararg function. But gcc still dutifully emits an xor %eax,%eax before
each and
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
I see that there are some intrinsics implemented in terms of __builtin_fabsf,
presumable they can be at 'risk' too of having a library call emitted?
The semantics of fabsf/fabs/fabsl are to clear the sign bit, never raise
any exceptions (even for
Hello.
Following patch is fix for PR64330, is pre-approved by Honza and I'm going to
install it.
No regression was seen on x86_64-linux-pc.
Thanks,
Martin
From 6f9ed17a2897be6a26e2c64f8e581771c216e41b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mliska mli...@suse.cz
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 19:11:48 +0100
On 12/17/2014 04:23 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Martin Liška mli...@suse.cz wrote:
On 12/11/2014 01:37 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Martin Liška mli...@suse.cz wrote:
Hello.
As suggested by Richard, I split compare_operand
of BB just
after label
if FLAG_FORCE_VECTORIZE is true.
(tree_if_conversion): Add initialization of
FLAG_FORCE_VECTORIZE which
is copy of inner or outer loop field force_vectorize.
patch.20141218
Description: Binary data
Hi!
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:02:37 +0100, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
void
init_pragma (void)
{
+ if (flag_openacc)
+{
+ const int n_oacc_pragmas
+ = sizeof (oacc_pragmas) / sizeof (*oacc_pragmas);
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i n_oacc_pragmas;
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:11 PM, H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com wrote:
The Linux kernel never passes floating point arguments around, vararg
functions or not. Hence no vector registers are ever used when calling a
vararg
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 02:24:06PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
It removed 14309 redundant xor %eax,%eax instructions and saved about
27KB. I am currently running the new kernel without any problem. OK
for trunk?
How about skipping RAX setup unconditionally for !TARGET_SSE? Please
see
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 02:24:06PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
It removed 14309 redundant xor %eax,%eax instructions and saved about
27KB. I am currently running the new kernel without any problem. OK
for trunk?
How
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
The Linux kernel never passes floating point arguments around, vararg
functions or not. Hence no vector registers are ever used when calling a
vararg function. But gcc still dutifully emits an xor %eax,%eax before
each and
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
The Linux kernel never passes floating point arguments around, vararg
functions or not. Hence no vector registers are ever used when calling a
vararg
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 3:09 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
The Linux kernel never passes floating point arguments around, vararg
functions or not. Hence no vector registers are ever used when calling a
vararg function. But gcc still dutifully emits an xor %eax,%eax before
each and
On 12/18/2014 06:17 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Sure. The below uses the c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings mechanism and
passes testing. I wondered if in such cases we could alternately use the
warning_sentinel mechanism (moved to cp-tree.h of course) ?
That would make sense to me.
Jason
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:07:01PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Many thanks for the review comments! The very most have been addresed,
here are just a few comments. If you feel strongly/differently about
any, I'll address those, too.
So, with your latest change both compilers build:
mkdir
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 02:48:32PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Like for CILK, I'd strongly prefer if for the clauses that are
specific to OpenACC only you'd use PRAGMA_OACC_CLAUSE_* instead,
and put them after the PRAGMA_CILK_* enum values.
If you want to have PRAGMA_OACC_CLAUSE_ aliases
Hello Ramana,
I don't know if you have started to look at it, but the attribute
support fails after upgrading.
This patch aims to catch up on the changes around the fipa_ra
-masm-syntax-unified options since the initial posting. They were not
tested/supported with the attribute, and of
Hi Jakub!
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:20:42 +0100, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
So, with your latest change both compilers build:
mkdir objmic; cd objmic
../configure --build=x86_64-intelmicemul-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-intelmicemul-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-intelmicemul-linux-gnu
Hi,
this patch adds handling of aliases within templates and tries to
resolve specialization for them.
ChangeLog
2014-12-18 Kai Tietz kti...@redhat.com
PR c++/61198
* pt.c (retrieve_specialization): Handle using.
Tested on x86_64-w64-mingw32. Ok for apply?
Regards,
Kai
ChangeLog
Hi!
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:40:01 +0300, Ilya Verbin iver...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch allows to run non-fallback 'make check-target-libgomp'. It passes
to
the host compiler additional -B options with the paths to the offload
compilers,
since non-installed host compiler doesn't know
Ping.
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 11/12/14 15:06, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg00340.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 04/12/14 09:19, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 02/12/14 22:58, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
Patch has been tested with DejaGnu gcc test suite on mips32r2 cross compiler
and bootstrapped and tested on
x86_64 native compiler.
Radovan
From: Jeff Law [l...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 1:18 PM
To: Radovan Obradovic;
Hi Jakub!
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:09:49 +0100, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
--- gcc/builtins.c
+++ gcc/builtins.c
+static rtx
+expand_builtin_acc_on_device (tree exp, rtx target ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
+{
+ if (!validate_arglist (exp, INTEGER_TYPE, VOID_TYPE))
+return
Hi,
On 12/18/2014 03:20 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 12/18/2014 06:17 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Sure. The below uses the c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings mechanism and
passes testing. I wondered if in such cases we could alternately use the
warning_sentinel mechanism (moved to cp-tree.h of course)
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 04:21:31PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/27/2014 01:28 AM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
+ if (warn_override DECL_VIRTUAL_P (decl) !DECL_OVERRIDE_P (decl)
Why check DECL_VIRTUAL_P here?
I think it was to avoid warning when decl is hiding a non virtual method
On 17/12/14 15:54, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Jiong Wang jiong.w...@arm.com wrote:
On 15/12/14 15:28, Jiong Wang wrote:
On 04/12/14 19:32, Jiong Wang wrote:
On 04/12/14 11:07, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Richard Biener
On 12/18/2014 06:12 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
# temporary until string.h is fixed
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -ffreestanding
Yes, it looks to me that new option is the way to go.
Is this an OK?
In principle, I'm OK with the patch approach, but let's wait for
eventual comments from Linux people.
Please, can somebody help me? Where do I find GCC approved/accepted patch?
Is there some patch directory in repository, if is please where?
Thanks and best regards,
Ricardo
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg00947.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 10/12/14 16:50, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
The company ARM is not Advanced RISC Machines anymore and anyway the ARM
architecture is distinct from the company.
This patch adjusts the documentation accordingly.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:08 AM, H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
On 12/18/2014 06:12 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
# temporary until string.h is fixed
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -ffreestanding
Yes, it looks to me that new option is the way to go.
Is this an OK?
In principle, I'm OK with the patch
On 12/18/2014 11:31 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ warning_sentinel s (extra_warnings);
Let's add a comment about which warning we're avoiding here. OK with
that change.
Jason
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:08 PM, H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
On 12/18/2014 06:12 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
# temporary until string.h is fixed
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -ffreestanding
Yes, it looks to me that new option is the way to go.
Is this an OK?
In principle, I'm OK with the patch
On 12/18/2014 10:10 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
+ if (TMPL_ARGS_DEPTH (args) TMPL_PARMS_DEPTH (tmpl_parms))
+args = get_innermost_template_args
+(args, TMPL_PARMS_DEPTH (tmpl_parms));
It seems unlikely to be correct to arbitrarily strip off outer template
args. Where did the
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 03:13:32PM -0200, Ricardo Sardano Guanciale wrote:
Please, can somebody help me? Where do I find GCC approved/accepted patch?
Is there some patch directory in repository, if is please where?
Approved patches are usually just committed to the SVN repository,
there is no
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 05:18:18PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg00947.html
This patch almost certainly falls under the obvious rule:
will the person who objects to my work the most be able to
find a fault with my fix?
ARM hasn't stood
On 12/17/2014 04:23 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Martin Liška mli...@suse.cz wrote:
On 12/11/2014 01:37 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Martin Liška mli...@suse.cz wrote:
Hello.
As suggested by Richard, I split compare_operand
Hi,
2014-12-18 16:27 GMT+01:00 Thomas Schwinge tho...@codesourcery.com:
Hi!
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:40:01 +0300, Ilya Verbin iver...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch allows to run non-fallback 'make check-target-libgomp'. It
passes to
the host compiler additional -B options with the paths to
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:08 PM, H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
On 12/18/2014 06:12 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
# temporary until string.h is fixed
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -ffreestanding
Yes, it looks to me that new option is
On 12/18/2014 09:43 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
Peter, please feel free to use my kernel patch or create a different
one.
Great, thanks!
-hpa
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 06:41:18PM +0100, Ilya Verbin wrote:
What we're doing in OpenACC offloading testing (gomp-4_0-branch), is in
the libgomp.oacc-c/c.exp (etc.) file cycle through all the available
offloading devices, and then in there -- I think -- such options should
be set, that are
Hi,
On 12/18/2014 06:21 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 12/18/2014 11:31 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ warning_sentinel s (extra_warnings);
Let's add a comment about which warning we're avoiding here. OK with
that change.
Thanks. I'm attaching what I just committed. This is a regression, I
Hi Jakub!
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:29:42 +0100, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 02:48:32PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Like for CILK, I'd strongly prefer if for the clauses that are
specific to OpenACC only you'd use PRAGMA_OACC_CLAUSE_* instead,
and put
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 07:00:09PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
OK, so there is this limit. But, I fail to understand how merely moving
the OpenACC-only PRAGMA_*_CLAUSE_* to the end of enum pragma_omp_clause
will help overcome that? Or have I now completely confused myself, and
I'm not even
2014-12-18 18:26 GMT+01:00 Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com:
On 12/18/2014 10:10 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
+ if (TMPL_ARGS_DEPTH (args) TMPL_PARMS_DEPTH (tmpl_parms))
+args = get_innermost_template_args
+(args, TMPL_PARMS_DEPTH (tmpl_parms));
It seems unlikely to be correct to
Hi!
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 23:26:53 +0100, I wrote:
Committed to gomp-4_0-branch in r218840:
commit febcd8dfdb10fa80edff0880973d1915ca2fef74
Author: tschwinge tschwinge@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
Date: Wed Dec 17 22:26:24 2014 +
Use include/gomp-constants.h more
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 07:25:03PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 23:26:53 +0100, I wrote:
Committed to gomp-4_0-branch in r218840:
commit febcd8dfdb10fa80edff0880973d1915ca2fef74
Author: tschwinge tschwinge@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
Date: Wed Dec
On Thu, Dec 18 2014, H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
On 12/18/2014 09:43 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
Peter, please feel free to use my kernel patch or create a different
one.
Great, thanks!
Thanks for accepting this idea, and especially to H.J. for already
having done all the work.
Minor
On 12/18/2014 10:37 AM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
Minor thing: If it's not too late, I'd appreciate a 'Suggested-by' or
similar mention in the kernel change log.
I think we can get that.
-hpa
Hi all,
here is my next try on proposing a patch for the issue in pr60255. It took me
quite some time to understand the intricacies with handling variables
associated in a select type. I think I got most of the issues fixed now:
- Added generation of _len component for each unlimited polymorphic
On 2014-12-17 7:56 PM, Kaz Kojima wrote:
This patch series is to make SH target use LRA and is discussed
in the PR target/55212:
[SH] Switch to LRA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
I think there are issues which should be solved before defaulting
LRA on SH and the helps from
On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 13:42 -0500, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
Thank you very much for your work on porting LRA to SH! I know it
is quite a challenge to do any RA work for this target.
The R0-ness (both, GP reg r0 and FP reg fr0) of the ISA taxes the
patience sometimes. Too often, I've been
On Dec 18, 2014, at 9:43 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
+ arguments passed in vector registers. This can be used to
+ optimize Linux kernel./li
English, to optimize _the_ Linux kernel?
Hi Jason.
It's embarrassing that I just got to this now. I hope you don't repay
the favor and take as long responding to me :(.
On 09/12/14 08:15, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/11/2014 08:51 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
/* Generate hidden aliases for Java. */
- if (candidates)
+ if
On Dec 18, 2014, at 10:42 AM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com wrote:
Thank you very much for your work on porting LRA to SH!
I’ve ported my target to LRA, and I have not found any LRA bits I needed to
change.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Dec 18, 2014, at 9:43 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
+ arguments passed in vector registers. This can be used to
+ optimize Linux kernel./li
English, to optimize _the_ Linux kernel?
Updated.
--
H.J.
---
2014-12-08 Martin Liska mli...@suse.cz
* cgraph.h (symbol_table::allocate_cgraph_symbol): Summary UID
is filled up.
* symbol-summary.h: New file.
* gengtype.c (open_base_files): Add symbol-summary.h.
* toplev.c (general_init): Call constructor of
gcc/lto/ChangeLog:
2014-12-08 Martin Liska mli...@suse.cz
* lto-partition.c: Include of symbol-summary.h is added.
* lto-symtab.c: Likewise.
* lto.c: Likewise.
I must say I am not friend of flattening. Hope this will be resolved for 5.1
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-12-08 Martin Liska mli...@suse.cz
* lto-partition.c (add_symbol_to_partition_1): New inline_summary_d
is used.
(undo_partition): Likewise.
(lto_balanced_map): Likewise.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-12-08 Martin Liska mli...@suse.cz
* cgraphunit.c
Hi Jason.
As promised, I am moving most everything out of
cxx_post_compilation_parsing_cleanups() which is the hook that will be
called after the compilation proper has run
(symtab-finalize_compilation_unit()).
Apart from the Java hidden alias support which I just asked you about,
and the
The following patch fixes testsuite failures
builtin-arith-overflow-[10,11].c. In the case where
rs6000_split_logical() was being called the operands were swapped such
that the wrong operand was being complemented.
Bootstrap/tested on powerpc64-linux with no new regressions. Ok for
trunk
The following patch solves
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64291
It is a bug in a new rematerialization subpass of LRA.
The patch was bootstrapped on x86/x86-64.
Committed as rev. 218874.
2014-12-18 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
PR rtl-optimization/64291
On 2014-12-17 8:00 PM, Kaz Kojima wrote:
This was discussed in PR55212
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212#c25
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212#c58
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212#c69
and is to fix another ICEs in assign_by_spills.
This patch
On 2014-12-17 7:59 PM, Kaz Kojima wrote:
This was discussed in PR55212
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212#c52
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212#c53
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212#c55
and is to fix ICE in assign_by_spills.
In that case,
2014-12-18 17:00 GMT+00:00 Jiong Wang jiong.w...@arm.com:
ok for trunk?
gcc/
PR62173
loop-invariant.c.c (expensive_addr): New hash_table.
(need_expensive_addr_check_p): New bool.
(find_exits): Rename to find_exists_and_reshuffle.
Support re-shuffle instructions for
On 2014-12-18 2:26 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Dec 18, 2014, at 10:42 AM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com wrote:
Thank you very much for your work on porting LRA to SH!
I’ve ported my target to LRA, and I have not found any LRA bits I needed to
change.
Thanks, Mike. When I did a few
On 2014-12-17 8:00 PM, Kaz Kojima wrote:
This patch adds a target macro discussed in PR55212
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212#c76
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212#c78
is to avoid bad codes on SH.
SH has very limited base+displacement addressing and it looks
On 2014-12-17 7:57 PM, Kaz Kojima wrote:
This patch is discussed in PR55212
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212#c47
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212#c48
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212#c49
and is to avoid segfault in remove_pseudos.
In the
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
c/
* c-typeck.c (convert_for_assignment, c_finish_return): For
-fsanitize=float-cast-overflow casts from REAL_TYPE to integer/enum
types also set in_late_binary_op around convert call.
* c-convert.c (convert): For
The following patch fixes a typo in usage of register_move_cost. For
most targets, the change does not matter as the cost function is
symmetric relative to args.
The patch was bootstrapped on x86-64.
Committed as rev. 218875.
2014-12-18 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 05:00:01PM +, Jiong Wang wrote:
On 17/12/14 15:54, Richard Biener wrote:
ick. I realize we don't have SSA form on RTL but doesn't DF provide
at least some help in looking up definition statements for pseudos?
In fact we want to restrict the transform to single-use
Here we were seeing errors because of template instantiation triggered
by mark_used within fold_non_dependent_expr. We don't want to
instantiate templates based on uses in other uninstantiated templates,
and we were already trying to avoid that; let's add another check to
avoid it.
Tested
We were just missing a case where we want to pass complain down to avoid
a hard error in SFINAE context.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit 83bea8460ce8e14e5b9d1c0dc33a0d22b63b566d
Author: Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Dec 18 12:42:34 2014 -0500
PR
On 12/18/2014 01:16 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
Well, in general I would have assumed to be able to get alias decl of
tmpl. Wasn't able to find a simple way to get it. So, by looking into
source I found that most cases handling args tmpl-args by using
inner_most_template_args instead. Defaulting to
Hi,
I had a discussion with Michael, and would like to put this patch on
hold for now till we have tree.h and rtl.h flattening
patches checked in to avoid conflicts.
Thankyou,
Prathamesh
On 16 December 2014 at 17:13, Prathamesh Kulkarni
prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
The attached
Hi,
this patch started as experiment moving hash_table_mod1 inline because it shows
high in streaming profiles and it represents a branch-less code that is good
to schedule to surrounding instructions.
While looking at hash-tab.h I however noticed that it was not updated very
well while it was
Since generic lambdas don't seem to work properly in C++11 mode, let's
upgrade the pedwarn to an error.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit 6c7d0ebb35b4918be3200625ef0cbb1816ddd7e9
Author: Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Dec 18 16:56:33 2014 -0500
PR c++/64105
This patch flattens tree.h and tree-core.h. This work is part of the GCC
Re-Architecture effort being led by Andrew MacLeod.
I removed the includes in tree.h and tree-core.h except for the include
of tree-core.h in tree.h.
I modified genattrtab.c, genautomata.c, genemit.c, gengtype.c,
Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz writes:
Hi,
this patch started as experiment moving hash_table_mod1 inline because it
shows
high in streaming profiles and it represents a branch-less code that is good
to schedule to surrounding instructions.
FWIW with a good modern hash function it shouldn't be
Hi Jakub,
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Alexey Samsonov samso...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:39:47PM -0800, Alexey Samsonov wrote:
That is not what I think we've agreed on and what is implemented
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
