On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 03:01:25PM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
On 07/23/2015 08:32 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 08:20:50AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
The attached patch does just that; it teaches
replace_block_vars_by_duplicates to replace the decls inside the
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 5:59 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:57 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Segher Boessenkool
seg...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:29:14PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Yeah.
On 07/23/2015 08:32 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 08:20:50AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
The attached patch does just that; it teaches
replace_block_vars_by_duplicates to replace the decls inside the
value-exprs with a duplicate too. It's kind of messy though. At the
On 07/20/2015 06:08 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Ping
2015-07-13 11:47 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
Ping
2015-06-18 12:54 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
Hi,
In early_inliner we do recompute inline summaries for edges after
optimize_inline_calls, but check
On 07/23/2015 03:55 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/22/2015 06:50 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
Given the mechanical nature and size, I just did spot checks which
looked fine.
OK for the trunk.
jeff
I'll wait until early next week.. shortly I'll y be off-line until then
so couldnt address any
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Segher Boessenkool
seg...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:29:14PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Yeah. Thanks, I've tested it with this change, and I'm now checking
this in (full patch first; adjusted incremental patch at the end):
Hello!
This patch rewrites convoluted initialization of
sysv_va_list_type_node and ms_va_list_type_node globals.
2015-07-23 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_build_builtin_va_list_64): Rename
from ix86_build_builtin_va_list_abi. Handle only 64bit non-MS_ABI
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:14 PM, David Edelsohn dje@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 5:59 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:57 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Segher Boessenkool
seg...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On 07/13/2015 08:03 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
2015-07-13 Kyrylo Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com
* ifcvt.c (struct noce_if_info): Add then_simple, else_simple,
then_cost, else_cost fields. Change branch_cost field to unsigned
int.
(end_ifcvt_sequence): Call set_used_flags on
On July 23, 2015 7:43:51 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/22/2015 09:29 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
While looking at PR c/16351, I noticed that all tests proposed for
-Wnull-attribute
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg01715.html) could be
warned from the FEs
: libgccjit (GCC) version 6.0.0 20150723 (experimental)
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
JIT: compiled by GNU C version 4.8.3 20140911 (Red Hat 4.8.3-7), GMP version
5.1.2, MPFR version 3.1.2, MPC version 1.0.1
JIT: entering: gcc_jit_context_set_str_option
JIT: GCC_JIT_STR_OPTION_PROGNAME: ./test
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:29:14PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Yeah. Thanks, I've tested it with this change, and I'm now checking
this in (full patch first; adjusted incremental patch at the end):
Unfortunately it causes about a thousand test fails on powerpc64-linux
(at least, it seems to
This patch gives the FSM jump threading code the opportunity to find
known values when we have a condition like (x != 0). Previously it just
allowed naked SSA_NAMES (which is what appears in a SWITCH_EXPR). This
patch allows us to thread a COND_EXPR.
Basically given (x != 0), we just ask
On 23/07/15 12:16, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 21/07/15 11:11, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 21/07/15 08:24, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This patch fixes the PR in
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 21/07/15 11:11, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 21/07/15 08:24, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This patch fixes the PR in question which
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 23/07/15 10:02, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de writes:
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr66952.c
===
---
Hi,
This patch prevents testcase pr63210.c from running with -march=armv4t.
Object size check should be skipped with explicit -march=armv4t, because
expected size is only correct using pop pc instruction which is unsafe for
armv4t. For arm_arch_v5t_ok cases, an explicit -march=armv5t flag is set.
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 01:03:19PM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
Hi Helmut, Hi Ulrich, Hi Andreas,
A toolchain configured as --target=s390-linux currently fails to build
gcc because of an undefined function:
undefined reference to
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:46:43PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
I bet that is gone break also cross-compilers from s390* to other targets.
I think this should be fine on s390. The problem with i386 is that
the driver-native.c file uses data types only defined by
Hi Helmut, Hi Ulrich, Hi Andreas,
A toolchain configured as --target=s390-linux currently fails to build
gcc because of an undefined function:
undefined reference to `s390_host_detect_local_cpu(int, char const**)'
Makefile:1858: recipe for target 'xgcc' failed
The patch below
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 07:43:23PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 07:26:22PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
In this testcase we were generating an uninitialized variable when doing
-fsanitize=shift,bounds sanitization. The shift instrumentation is done
first; after that,
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 09/07/15 13:04, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 07/07/15 17:58, Tom de Vries wrote:
If you can
handle one exit edge I also can't see the difficulty in handling
all exit edges.
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch allows non-float reductions to be detected by graphite, independent
of whether fassociative-math (which only has effect for float operations) is
set.
Currently bootstrapping and reg-testing on x86_64.
OK for trunk?
Ok
Thanks,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:46:43PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
This is supposed to be fixed by this pending patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg01546.html
LGTM.
The config.host change also looks wrong, e.g. i?86 or mips have:
i[34567]86-*-* \
| x86_64-*-* )
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Hurugalawadi, Naveen
naveen.hurugalaw...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
so using wi::mask is prefered here.
Thanks for your review and comments.
Please find attached the modified patch as per your comments.
Please let me know if this version is okay?
Ok with
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 03:09:46PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 03:03:29PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Oh, I agree this will not be *used*. I just wanted to point out that it
will not *break* cross-compilers as is.
I think it would be better for consistency and
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:20:51PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
So isn't the bug instead that the UBSAN_BOUNDS generating code doesn't
unshare? Of course, these two functions use op0 and/or op1 sometimes
multiple times too and thus they might want to unshare too, but I'd have
expected in a
I agree with Paul that this is orthogonal to the compilation cascade
phenomenon.
In my opinion, putting PRIVATE entities in a module does not make much
sense (yes, I know my example does it, but it is a quick adaptation of
an existing code, not a clean design). If the main MODULE only contains
On 07/23/2015 10:33 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:09:49AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
It seems to me in these kind of cases that selection of the canonical
form should be driven by factors outside of which is better for a
particular target. ie, which is simpler
I agree.
On 07/23/2015 04:44 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On July 23, 2015 7:43:51 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/22/2015 09:29 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
While looking at PR c/16351, I noticed that all tests proposed for
-Wnull-attribute
On 06/11/2015 04:05 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Attached is an updated patch for both GCC and the manual.
The patch implements the suggested warning, -Wbuiltin-address,
that issues diagnostics for unsafe calls of the builtin address
functions. Safe calls are those with arguments 0 or 1 anywhere
in
On 07/23/2015 03:28 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Ping
Richard Sandiford richard.sandif...@arm.com writes:
The pattern was accepting a nonimediate_operand, using the C condition
to weed out certain types of memory, but was then using an r constraint
to force a register. This patch makes the
Hi Marek,
sorry for taking so long to respond.
Fri, 15 May 2015 15:38:43 +0200
Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com:
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 09:42:23AM -0700, Martin Uecker wrote:
here is a tentative patch to implement a new attribute nonzero,
which is similar to nonnull, but is not a
This patch from Chris Manghane avoids a compiler crash for some kinds
of invalid code. This is http://golang.org/issue/11592 .
Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Committed to mainline.
Ian
Index: gcc/go/gofrontend/MERGE
On 07/19/2015 09:17 PM, Kugan wrote:
I have made a mistake while addressing the review comments for this
patch. Unfortunately, It was not detected in my earlier testing. My
sincere graphology for the mistake.
I have basically missed the STRICT_LOW_PART check for the first if-check
thus the
On 07/22/2015 06:50 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
This is the result of running include reduction on all the files which
make up libbackend.a, as well as most of the language files found in
subdirectories lto, c ,cp, java, go, fortran, jit, ada. well, some of
ada. :-)
I looked at the output and
This patch from Chris Manghane makes empty interface types for
variables at parse time when there are no methods. This is normally
cleaned up later, but for sink variables that clean up never happens
and we get an internal compiler error. This fixes
https://golang.org/issue/11579. Bootstrapped
On 07/20/2015 09:05 AM, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
Hi Jeff!
Thanks for your details comments.
You asked:
How are conditionals on vectors usually handled? You should try to
mimick that and report, with detail, why that's not working.
In current implementation of vectorization pass all comparisons
Sorry for the slow reply, been away.
Matthew Fortune matthew.fort...@imgtec.com writes:
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
Robert Suchanek robert.sucha...@imgtec.com writes:
@@ -771,7 +771,8 @@ struct mips_cpu_info {
/* Infer a -mnan=2008 setting from a -mips argument.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:57 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Segher Boessenkool
seg...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:29:14PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Yeah. Thanks, I've tested it with this change, and I'm now checking
this
Ping
Richard Sandiford richard.sandif...@arm.com writes:
The pattern was accepting a nonimediate_operand, using the C condition
to weed out certain types of memory, but was then using an r constraint
to force a register. This patch makes the predicate match the constraint
and removes the C
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Bin Cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
This patch is to fix PR66388. It's an old issue but recently became worse
after my scev overflow change. IVOPT now can only compute iv use with
candidate which has at least same type precision. See below code:
if
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Segher Boessenkool
seg...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
This does one of the TODOs I added: it adds dot forms of the ANDs done
with two machine insns. It uses a new helper function (rs6000_emit_dot_insn)
that probably can be used more often; it is quite general
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 7:43 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Mike Stump m...@mrs.kithrup.com wrote:
On Jul 15, 2015, at 9:07 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com wrote:
-
Hi Richard,
I checked that both test-cases from 23855 are sucessfully unswitched
by proposed patch. I understand that it does not catch deeper loop
nest as
for (i=0; i10; i++)
for (j=0;jn;j++)
for (k=0;k20;k++)
...
but duplication of middle-loop does not look reasonable.
Here
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:39:05PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:20:51PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
So isn't the bug instead that the UBSAN_BOUNDS generating code doesn't
unshare? Of course, these two functions use op0 and/or op1 sometimes
multiple times too
This moves address-of-decl simplifications. The second pattern is from
if (integer_zerop (arg1)
tree_expr_nonzero_p (arg0))
{
tree res = constant_boolean_node (code==NE_EXPR, type);
return omit_one_operand_loc (loc, type, res, arg0);
}
which
This does one of the TODOs I added: it adds dot forms of the ANDs done
with two machine insns. It uses a new helper function (rs6000_emit_dot_insn)
that probably can be used more often; it is quite general in any case.
Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64-linux, using {-m32,-m32/-mpowerpc64,
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/20/2015 04:59 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Ping
2015-06-19 17:10 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
Hi,
There was a set of stability fixes (mostly different ICEs) for Pointer
Bounds Checker done in GCC 6.
Hello Paul,
Le 23/07/2015 09:46, Paul Richard Thomas a écrit :
Since all the private entities in a module have to be transmitted to
their descendant submodules, whilst keeping them hidden from normal
use statements, I have chosen to write the module file as usual and
add a second part that
On Jul 23, 2015, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, ok. Does using
if (currently_expanding_to_rtl)
work? I think it's slightly more descriptive.
Yeah. Thanks, I've tested it with this change, and I'm now checking
this in (full patch first; adjusted incremental patch
On 07/13/2015 06:43 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
This also hints at other problems (which might not actually occur in the
case at hand, but still): the contents of DECL_VALUE_EXPR is the real
thing containing the value of a decl (i.e. a decl having a value-expr
doesn't itself occur in the code
So I stumbled across fold_cond_expr_cond and traced it back to
pre-GIMPLE and pre-fold_XXX times. It folds all conditions in
a function (but only if they fold to always true/false). It
does this after CFG construction but before cfg-cleanup. It
does that to allow cfg-cleanup to be less
Dominik Vogt wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog
* config/s390/driver-native.c (s390_host_detect_local_cpu): Handle
processor capabilities with -march=native.
* config/s390/s390.h (MARCH_MTUNE_NATIVE_SPECS): Likewise.
(DRIVER_SELF_SPECS): Likewise. Join specs for 31 and 64 bit.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 03:03:29PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:46:43PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
I bet that is gone break also cross-compilers from s390* to other
targets.
I think this should be fine on s390. The problem with
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:09:49AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
It seems to me in these kind of cases that selection of the canonical
form should be driven by factors outside of which is better for a
particular target. ie, which is simpler
I agree. But neither form is simpler here, and we need
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 08:20:50AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
The attached patch does just that; it teaches
replace_block_vars_by_duplicates to replace the decls inside the
value-exprs with a duplicate too. It's kind of messy though. At the
moment I'm only considering VAR_DECL, PARM_DECL,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Hurugalawadi, Naveen
naveen.hurugalaw...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
Your previous patch correctly restricted this to unsigned types.
Thanks for your review and comments.
Please find attached the modified patch as per your comments.
Please let me know if this
On 07/15/2015 11:52 PM, Kugan wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c
index 932c83a..3058eb5 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c
return false;
bb = gimple_bb (stmt);
if (!single_succ_p (bb))
@@ -2729,9 +2743,8 @@
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 01:03:19PM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
Hi Helmut, Hi Ulrich, Hi Andreas,
A toolchain configured as --target=s390-linux currently fails to build
gcc because of an undefined function:
undefined reference to `s390_host_detect_local_cpu(int, char const**)'
On 07/23/2015 01:44 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 20:50 -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
(snip)
I will eventually put all these tools into a directory in contrib. It
simple enough to run it this ordering on any source file.
(snip)
If I'm understanding things right, we will have
On Jul 23, 2015, at 7:47 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 7:43 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Mike Stump m...@mrs.kithrup.com wrote:
On Jul 15, 2015, at 9:07 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 16:16:44 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/liboffloadmic/plugin/Makefile.am
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+# Plugin for offload execution on Intel MIC devices.
+main_target_image.h: offload_target_main
+ @echo -n const int image_size = $@
+ @stat
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached patch backports fixes for PR 58066 to release branches.
2015-07-XX Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
Backport from mainline:
2015-07-17 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
PR rtl-optimization/66891
*
On 07/22/2015 09:29 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
While looking at PR c/16351, I noticed that all tests proposed for
-Wnull-attribute
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg01715.html) could be
warned from the FEs by simply extending the existing Wnonnull.
Bootstrapped and regression
On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 20:50 -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
(snip)
I then ran it through an ordering tool, (which I will eventually put in
contrib). This tool looks at include files, and puts them in a
standard order, and removes duplicates that have already been
included.. even if it is
* include/bits/functional_hash.h: Add specializations for __intN
types.
* include/ext/pb_ds/detail/thin_heap_/thin_heap_.hpp (__gnu_pbds):
Guard against values that might exceed size_t's precision.
Yes, OK - thanks.
Committed. Thanks!
I no longer work at Mentor/CodeSourcery. Until I start my new job in
September I'll be using my personal email address.
At this time I would like to propose to the SC (two members Cc'ed) that
Nathan Sidwell be appointed nvptx maintainer instead of me, as he is the
one who will continue to
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'cpplib' has been submitted
by the Dutch team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/cpplib/nl.po
(This file, 'cpplib-5.2.0.nl.po',
cpplib-5.2.0.nl.po.gz
Description: Binary data
The Translation Project robot, in the
name of your translation coordinator.
coordina...@translationproject.org
On 07/21/2015 02:32 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
Could somebody with access to sourceware.org upload a tar.bz2 of the required
version of isl from http://isl.gforge.inria.fr/isl-0.15.tar.bz2?
Also, once that is done, I will commit the following patch updating the
documentation.
I've put
On 07/21/2015 04:56 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
Ping.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 06:38:12PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
Ok, in that case I think easiest would the following (I hit the same issue
when writing the -Wtautological-compare patch):
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
On 07/21/2015 06:40 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On July 21, 2015 11:38:31 AM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 09:15:31AM +, Hurugalawadi, Naveen wrote:
Please find
This sprinkles some more unshare_exprs here and there in the ubsan code.
Maybe we'll have to add some more of them elsewhere, too.
Unfortunately this doesn't fix the ARM -Wmaybe-uninitialized issue yet :(.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
2015-07-23 Marek Polacek
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:06:40PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
This sprinkles some more unshare_exprs here and there in the ubsan code.
Maybe we'll have to add some more of them elsewhere, too.
Unfortunately this doesn't fix the ARM -Wmaybe-uninitialized issue yet :(.
The following adds a single-use restriction to the widening/sing-change
comparison pattern which fixes PR66916.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Verified the
arm testcase produces expected assembly with a cc1 cross.
Richard.
2015-07-22 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
Dear All,
This is the third and final patch to implement submodules in gfortran.
It is the part that deals with private module entities. Unfortunately,
it is the most invasive and I would either like to have strong support
for it to be committed or a bright idea as to how to do it otherwise.
On 21/07/15 17:07, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 04:21:02PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This patch implements the target-specific inlining rules.
The basic philosophy is that we want to definitely reject inlining if the
callee's architecture
is not a subset,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
[ Re: [RFC, PR66873] Use graphite for parloops ]
On 22/07/15 13:01, Richard Biener wrote:
why only scalar floats? Please use FLOAT_TYPE_P.
+ if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type))
+return (!TYPE_OVERFLOW_TRAPS (type)
+
Hi all,
This obvious patch replaces yet another instance of manual swapping by
std::swap.
Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64 and x86_64.
Applied to trunk with r226094.
Thanks,
Kyrill
2015-07-23 Kyrylo Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com
* combine.c (try_combine): Use std::swap instead of
On Jul 23, 2015, at 12:46 AM, Paul Richard Thomas
paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
Since all the private entities in a module have to be transmitted to
their descendant submodules, whilst keeping them hidden from normal
use statements, I have chosen to write the module file as usual
Dear Damian,
I do not think that there is any effect on compilation cascades. As
long as the private part of the module file remains unchanged, it will
not be recompiled if a descendant submodule is modified. Naturally,
the size of the module file is increased but, if one is careful, this
is not
Hi,
PTF_AVOID_BRANCHLIKELY replaced with 0 in all 3 cases.
AFAICS, there is no need to update the option handling code. The branch
likely will not be enabled as it is additionally guarded by
ISA_HAS_BRANCHLIKELY.
OK with those changes.
I'll commit the updated patch once the build
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 09:38:26AM +0100, Jiong Wang wrote:
James Greenhalgh writes:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 02:45:39PM +0100, Jiong Wang wrote:
Marcus Shawcroft writes:
2015-06-26 Jiong Wang jiong.w...@arm.com
wwwdocs/
* htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html (AArch64): Document
Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de writes:
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr66952.c
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr66952.c(revision 0)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr66952.c(working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
On 22/07/15 22:26 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Another place where a list of all types are explicitly listed, and
the __intN types need to be included, and elsewhere protection against
errors [-Wnarrowing] on targets that have small size_t. Ok?
* include/bits/functional_hash.h: Add
James Greenhalgh writes:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 02:45:39PM +0100, Jiong Wang wrote:
Marcus Shawcroft writes:
2015-06-26 Jiong Wang jiong.w...@arm.com
wwwdocs/
* htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html (AArch64): Document -fpic for small model.
Index: gcc-6/changes.html
Hi!
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:47:32 -0400, Nathan Sidwell nat...@acm.org wrote:
On 07/20/15 11:08, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 07/20/15 09:01, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 07/18/15 11:37, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
For OpenACC nvptx offloading, there must still be something wrong; here's
a count of
On 21/07/15 11:11, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 21/07/15 08:24, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This patch fixes the PR in question which is a miscompilation of
gcc.dg/fixed-point/unary.c on arm.
It just
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
[ Re: [RFC, PR66873] Use graphite for parloops ]
On 22/07/15 13:01, Richard Biener wrote:
why only scalar floats? Please use
On 23/07/15 10:02, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de writes:
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr66952.c
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr66952.c (revision 0)
+++
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
[ was: Re: [RFC, PR66873] Use graphite for parloops ]
On 22/07/15 13:02, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:42 PM,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev ysrum...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Here is simple fix which fixes PR66926 and PR66951 - fix condition for
renaming virtual operands to determine that statement is outside of
loop.
Bootstrap and regression testing did not show any new failures.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
[ was: Re: [RFC, PR66873] Use graphite for parloops ]
On 22/07/15 13:02, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:42 PM,
On 07/16/2015 10:34 AM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote:
This patch series aims at enhancing GCC to emit standard DWARF in place
of the current GNAT encodings (non-standard DWARF) for a set of basic
types: dynamic arrays, variable-length records, variant parts, etc.
Ping for the patch series:
On 24/06/15 10:25, Matthew Wahab wrote:
Ping. Attached updated patch which also actually removes armv6zk from
doc/invoke.texi.
Also, retested:
- arm-none-linux-gnueabihf native bootstrap and cross-compiled make checck.
- arm-none-eabi: cross-compiled make check.
gcc/
2015-07-23 Matthew Wahab
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote:
On Jul 21, 2015, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote:
+ if (cfun-gimple_df)
If the cfun-gimple_df check is to decide whether
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
Hi,
I noticed recently that tree-pass.h contains a declaration of
get_current_pass_name,
but this function is not defined, and where ever we need the current pass
name,
we simply use current_pass-name. So I
Hi Matthew,
On 23/07/15 11:54, Matthew Wahab wrote:
On 24/06/15 10:25, Matthew Wahab wrote:
Ping. Attached updated patch which also actually removes armv6zk from
doc/invoke.texi.
Also, retested:
- arm-none-linux-gnueabihf native bootstrap and cross-compiled make checck.
- arm-none-eabi:
99 matches
Mail list logo
