Hi,
This patch adds an entry for cscope.out in .gitignore.
OK to commit ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
ignore-cscope.diff
Description: Binary data
Hi,
The attached patch gates abs(__a) cmp abs(__b) for vca intrinsics on
__FAST_MATH__. I moved vabs intrinsics before vcage_f32 since vca
intrinsics use those.
Bootstrapped+tested on arm-linux-gnueabihf.
OK to commit ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2021-06-22 Prathamesh Kulkarni
PR target/66791
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 13:27, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 12:45, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 16:01, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 15:22, Prathamesh Kulkarni
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 13:31, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:58, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 13:15, Christophe Lyon
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 09:27, Prathamesh Kulkarni via
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 15:49, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 16:15, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > > Sent: 14 June 2021 08:58
> > > To:
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 16:15, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > Sent: 14 June 2021 08:58
> > To: gcc Patches ; Kyrylo Tkachov
> >
> > Subject: Re: [ARM] PR97906 - Missed lowering abs(a)
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:58, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 13:15, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 09:27, Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > As mentioned in
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 14:49, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> The attached patch replaces calls to _builtin_neon_vceq (a, b) with a
> == b
> for integral variants, and for fp variants it gates the equality
> comparison on __FAST_MATH__ because for fp variants a == b result
On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 12:46, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 at 16:03, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > As mentioned in PR, for following test-case:
> >
> > #include
> >
> > uint32x2_t f1(float32x2_t a, float32x2_
On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 12:45, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 16:01, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 15:22, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 26 May 2021 at 14:07, Marc Gliss
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 13:15, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 09:27, Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > As mentioned in PR, for the following test-case:
> >
> > #include
> >
> > bfloat16x4
both produce vceq.f32 with -ffast-math.
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2021-06-09 Prathamesh Kulkarni
* config/arm/arm_neon.h (vceq_s8): Replace builtin with __a == __b.
(vceq_s16): Likewise.
(vceq_s32): Likewise.
(vceq_u8): Likewise.
(vceq_u16): Likewise
On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 at 16:03, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> As mentioned in PR, for following test-case:
>
> #include
>
> uint32x2_t f1(float32x2_t a, float32x2_t b)
> {
> return vabs_f32 (a) >= vabs_f32 (b);
> }
>
> uint32x2_t f2(float32x2_t a, fl
On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 16:01, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 15:22, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 26 May 2021 at 14:07, Marc Glisse wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 26 May 2021, Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches wrote:
&
Hi,
As mentioned in PR, for the following test-case:
#include
bfloat16x4_t f1 (bfloat16_t a)
{
return vdup_n_bf16 (a);
}
bfloat16x4_t f2 (bfloat16_t a)
{
return (bfloat16x4_t) {a, a, a, a};
}
Compiling with arm-linux-gnueabi -O3 -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp
-march=armv8.2-a+bf16+fp16
ss-tested on arm*-*-*.
OK to commit ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2021-06-01 Prathamesh Kulkarni
PR target/97906
* config/arm/iterators.md (NEON_VACMP): Remove.
* config/arm/neon.md (neon_vca): Use GLTE instead of GTGE
iterator.
(neon_vca_insn):
On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 15:22, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 May 2021 at 14:07, Marc Glisse wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 26 May 2021, Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >
> > > The attached patch removes calls to builtins in vmul_n* (a, b) wi
On Wed, 26 May 2021 at 14:07, Marc Glisse wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 May 2021, Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> > The attached patch removes calls to builtins in vmul_n* (a, b) with __a *
> > __b.
>
> I am not familiar with neon, but are __a and __b unsigned h
lr
-.L13:
- .align 3
-.L12:
- .short 0
- .short 0
- .short 0
- .short 0
.size test_vmul_n_16x8, .-test_vmul_n_16x8
Adjusted the test, to fix the failing tests.
OK to commit if testing passes ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2021-26-05 Prathamesh Kulkarni
On Wed, 12 May 2021 at 20:33, Richard Earnshaw
wrote:
>
> On 12/05/2021 12:05, Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 May 2021 at 16:02, Richard Earnshaw
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/05/2021 08:46, Prathamesh Kul
On Wed, 12 May 2021 at 16:02, Richard Earnshaw
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/05/2021 08:46, Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 19:55, Richard Earnshaw
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 06/05/202
On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 19:55, Richard Earnshaw
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 06/05/2021 01:14, Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Hi,
> > The attached patch replaces __builtin_neon_vtst* (a, b) with (a & b) != 0.
> > Bootstrapped and tested on arm-linux
Hi,
The attached patch replaces __builtin_neon_vtst* (a, b) with (a & b) != 0.
Bootstrapped and tested on arm-linux-gnueabihf and cross-tested on arm*-*-*.
OK to commit ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
vtst-1.diff
Description: Binary data
On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 at 15:42, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
>
> Hi Prathamesh,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > Sent: 05 February 2021 09:53
> > To: gcc Patches ; Kyrylo Tkachov
> >
> > Subject: [PR97903][ARM] Misse
On Tue, 4 May 2021 at 07:30, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On May 3, 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 4:42 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 4/28/2021 10:26 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> > On Feb 22, 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 at 19:19, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> DSE performs a backwards walk over stmts removing stores but it
> leaves removing resulting dead SSA defs to later passes. This
> eats into its own alias walking budget if the removed stores kept
> loads live. The following patch adds
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 at 17:02, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Support for vadd has been present for a while, but it was lacking a
> test.
>
> 2021-04-22 Christophe Lyon
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> * gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vadd-1.c: New.
> ---
>
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 at 16:32, Ayush Mittal via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Dynamic memory referenced by 'buffer' was allocated using xmalloc but fails
> to free it
> when jump to 'error' label.
>
> Issue as per static analysis tool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ayush Mittal
> Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh
>
Hi,
For the following test-case:
#include
uint8x8_t f1(int8x8_t a, int8x8_t b) {
return (uint8x8_t) ((a & b) != 0);
}
gcc fails to lower test operation to vtst, and instead emits:
f1:
vandd0, d0, d1
vceq.i8 d0, d0, #0
vmvnd0, d0
bx lr
The
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 17:23, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 1/19/21 5:55 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > Hi,
> > The attached patch fixes the issue mentioned in PR, by adding
> > arm_fp16_format to checked_options in optc-save-gen.awk.
> > Is this OK to commi
Hi,
The attached patch fixes the issue mentioned in PR, by adding
arm_fp16_format to checked_options in optc-save-gen.awk.
Is this OK to commit in stage-4 if testing passes or should we hold it
till next stage-1 ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
pr98636-2.diff
Description: Binary data
Hi,
The attached patch removes __builtin_neon_vcge* function with >= and
<= operators for vcge and vcle intrinsics respectively.
Cross tested on arm*-*-*.
OK for trunk ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
vcge-1.diff
Description: Binary data
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 16:01, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
>
> Hi Prathamesh
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > Sent: 04 January 2021 10:27
> > To: gcc Patches ; Kyrylo Tkachov
> >
> > Subject: [PR66791][ARM] Replace __bui
Hi Kyrill,
The attached patch replaces __builtin_vextv8qi with __builtin_shuffle
for vext_s8.
Just wanted to confirm if this is in the correct direction ?
If yes, I will send a follow up patch that converts for all vext intrinsics.
Thanks,
Prathamesh
vext-1.diff
Description: Binary data
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 21:04, Andrea Corallo wrote:
>
> Kyrylo Tkachov writes:
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Andrea Corallo
> >> Sent: 17 December 2020 14:56
> >> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> >> Cc: Kyrylo Tkac
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 10:46, Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 8:52 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 15:52, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 5:22 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches
>
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 17:11, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 14:36, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 17:37, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> > > >
> &g
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 15:52, Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 5:22 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 00:29, sunil.k.pandey wrote:
> > >
> > > On Linux/x86_64,
> > >
> > > 3a6e3ad
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 14:36, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 17:37, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 7:11 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 16:15, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> > &g
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 00:29, sunil.k.pandey wrote:
>
> On Linux/x86_64,
>
> 3a6e3ad38a17a03ee0139b49a0946e7b9ded1eb1 is the first bad commit
> commit 3a6e3ad38a17a03ee0139b49a0946e7b9ded1eb1
> Author: Prathamesh Kulkarni
> Date: Tue Dec 8 14:30:04 2020 +0530
>
>
Hi,
This patch replaces calls to __builtin_neon_vcgt* by < and > in vclt
and vcgt intrinsics respectively, and removes entry to vcgt from
arm_neon_builtins.def.
OK to commit ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
vclt-2.diff
Description: Binary data
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 16:23, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> This patch replaces calls to __builtin_neon_vneg* builtins by -
> operator, for vneg intrinsics in arm_neon.h.
> Cross-tested on arm*-*-*.
> OK to commit ?
This patch removes call to entry for vneg from arm
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 16:26, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 16:50, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
> >
> > Hi Prathamesh,
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > > Sent: 03 Decembe
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 17:37, Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 7:11 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 16:15, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 5:47 PM Richard Biener wrote:
> > > >
&g
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 16:34, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
>
> Hi Prathamesh,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > Sent: 07 December 2020 11:01
> > To: Kyrylo Tkachov
> > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> > Subject: Re: [PR667
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 16:05, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gcc-patches On Behalf Of
> > Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches
> > Sent: 03 December 2020 10:30
> > To: gcc Patches ; Kyrill Tkachov
> >
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 16:50, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
>
> Hi Prathamesh,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > Sent: 03 December 2020 10:50
> > To: gcc Patches ; Kyrylo Tkachov
> >
> > Subject: [PR66791][ARM] Replace __bui
Hi,
This patch replaces calls to __builtin_neon_vneg* builtins by -
operator, for vneg intrinsics in arm_neon.h.
Cross-tested on arm*-*-*.
OK to commit ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
vneg-1.diff
Description: Binary data
Hi,
This patch replaces calls to __builtin_neon_vcreate* builtins for
vcreate intrinsics in arm_neon.h.
Cross-tested on arm*-*-*.
OK to commit ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
vcreate-1.diff
Description: Binary data
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 22:01, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> This patch replaces calls to __builtin_neon_vmvnv* builtins with ~
> operator in arm_neon.h.
> Cross-tested on arm*-*-*.
> OK to commit ?
ping https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/560223.html
Hi,
This patch replaces calls to __builtin_neon_vmvnv* builtins with ~
operator in arm_neon.h.
Cross-tested on arm*-*-*.
OK to commit ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
vmvn-1.diff
Description: Binary data
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 19:13, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > For the following test-case (slightly reduced from PR)
> > int a, b, c;
> >
> > int g() {
> > char i = 0;
> > for (
Hi,
For the following test-case (slightly reduced from PR)
int a, b, c;
int g() {
char i = 0;
for (c = 0; c <= 8; c++)
--i;
while (b) {
_Bool f = i <= 0;
a = (a == 0) ? 0 : f / a;
}
}
The compiler segfaults with -O1 -march=armv8.2-a+sve in ifcvt_local_dce.
IIUC, the issue
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 18:40, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 07:32, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 19:54, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 12:19 AM Prathamesh Kulkarni
>
On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 19:54, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 12:19 AM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 19:40, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 1:52 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 19:40, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 1:52 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 19:52, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:28 AM Prathamesh Kulkarni
>
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 19:52, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:28 AM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 20:03, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 18:42, Richard Biener
>
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 20:03, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 18:42, Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 1:48 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 19:44, Richard Biener
>
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 14:54, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 14:56, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 14:41, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 19:17, Richard Biener
>
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 18:42, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 1:48 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 19:44, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 12:37 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
>
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 19:44, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 12:37 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 19:10, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 5:31 AM Prathamesh Kulkarni
>
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 14:56, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 14:41, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 19:17, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:49 AM Prathamesh Kulkarni
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 19:10, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 5:31 AM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 17:17, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 7:04 AM Prathamesh Kulkarni
>
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 14:41, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 19:17, Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:49 AM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 14:38, Richard Biener
>
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 19:17, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:49 AM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 14:38, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 1:02 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 14:38, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 1:02 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 05:09:36PM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > > On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 17:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > >
>
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 17:17, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 7:04 AM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 15:44, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 11:20 AM Prathamesh Kulkarni
>
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 17:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 04:56:59PM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > Thanks for the suggestions. In the attached patch I bumped up value of
> > ERF_RETURNS_ARG_MASK
> > to UINT_MAX >> 2, and use hi
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 17:36, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:53 PM Joseph Myers wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 24 Jan 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> > > The middle-end representation issue of ERF_RETURNS_ARG still remains,
> > > whi
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 04:35, Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > This patch attempts to add returns_arg attribute for c-family
> > languages. For C++ methods, first arg is assumed to be this pointer,
>
> Th
On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 15:44, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 11:20 AM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 at 17:38, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 12:17 AM Kugan Vive
Hi,
This patch attempts to add returns_arg attribute for c-family
languages. For C++ methods, first arg is assumed to be this pointer,
similar to alloc_size.
I have a couple of doubts:
(a) I am not sure why DECL_ARGUMENTS (decl) in
handle_returns_arg_attribute returns NULL ? My intent was to
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 15:50, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 at 17:38, Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 12:17 AM Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > Thanks for the review.
&
On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 at 17:38, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 12:17 AM Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > Thanks for the review.
> >
> > On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 at 03:57, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 6:45 PM Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> > > wrote:
> > >
On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 at 18:17, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 15:41, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:40 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > > wro
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 15:41, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:40 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 16:54, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 20 Nov 2019, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > &
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 17:09, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 16:54, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 20 Nov 2019, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Thanks for doing this. Adding Richard on cc:, sin
> > here apart from the testcase.
>
> Ah.
>
> > > 2019-11-19 Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > >
> > > PR tree-optimization/89007
> > > * tree-vect-patterns.c (vect_recog_average_pattern): If there is no
> > > target support avail
On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 at 13:42, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Nov 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > The issue seems to happen with -O1, because header only contains phi:
> >
> >[local count: 118111600]:
> > # iter.12_9 = PHI <0(2
Hi,
The issue seems to happen with -O1, because header only contains phi:
[local count: 118111600]:
# iter.12_9 = PHI <0(2), iter.12_10(10)>
and thus we hit segfault in following hunk in find_loop_guard:
else
{
cond = dyn_cast (last_stmt (header));
if (!
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 16:17, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
>
> Hi Prathamesh,
>
> On 11/14/19 6:47 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > Hi,
> > As suggested in PR, the attached patch falls back to distributing
> > rshift over plus_expr instead of fallback widening -> ari
hamesh
2019-11-15 Prathamesh Kulkarni
PR tree-optimization/89007
* tree-vect-patterns.c (vect_recog_average_pattern): If there is no
target support available, generate code to distribute rshift over plus
and add one depending upon floor or ceil rounding.
tes
On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 at 18:36, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 at 05:46, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 18:37, Christophe Lyon
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 16:03, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 18:37, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 16:03, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 07:18, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 9:58 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
>
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 07:18, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 9:58 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 at 13:19, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:45 PM Pratham
On Sun, 27 Oct 2019 at 06:08, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > @@ -10288,6 +10261,23 @@ vectorizable_condition (stmt_vec_info stmt_info,
> > gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi,
> > vect_finish_stmt_generation (
On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 at 13:19, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:45 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > The attached patch tries to fix PR92163 by calling
> > gimple_purge_dead_eh_edges from ifcvt_local_dce if we need eh cleanup.
the state
> before the patch wouldn't have been that meaningful. In particular...
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
> > index a70d52eb2ca..82814e2c2af 100644
> > --- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
> >
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 13:12, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
> > index acdd90784dc..dfd33b142ed 100644
> > --- a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
> > +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-stmt
Hi,
The attached patch tries to fix PR92163 by calling
gimple_purge_dead_eh_edges from ifcvt_local_dce if we need eh cleanup.
Does it look OK ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2019-10-24 Prathamesh Kulkarni
PR tree-optimization/92163
* tree-if-conv.c (ifcvt_local_dce): Call
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 14:36, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > Hi,
> > The attached patch tries to fix PR91272.
> > Does it look OK ?
> >
> > With patch, I see following failures for aarch64-sve.exp:
> > FAIL: gcc.target/a
On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 23:45, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > Hi Richard,
> > Sorry for not adding the test in PR91532 fix.
> > Is the attached patch OK to commit ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Prathamesh
> >
> > 2
Hi Richard,
Sorry for not adding the test in PR91532 fix.
Is the attached patch OK to commit ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2019-10-18 Prathamesh Kulkarni
PR tree-optimization/91532
testsuite/
* gcc.target/aarch64/sve/fmla_2.c: Add dg-scan check for deleted store.
diff --git a/gcc
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 04:19, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 8:07 AM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 08:14, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >&
Hi,
The attached patch tries to fix PR91272.
Does it look OK ?
With patch, I see following failures for aarch64-sve.exp:
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/clastb_1.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve
scan-assembler \\tclastb\\tw[0-9]+, p[0-7], w[0-9]+, z[0-9]+\\.s
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/clastb_2.c
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 at 23:23, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 03:24:02PM -0700, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > The patch fixes this by simply putting gsi_next in else, which avoids
> > the above issue.
> > Bootstrap+test in progress on x86_64-unknown-lin
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 08:14, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 13:21, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
> >
> > Leaving the main review to Richard, just some comments...
> >
> > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > > @@ -9774,6 +9777,10 @@ vect_
Hi,
The issue with PR91532 patch was in following hunk in ifcvt_local_dce:
if (dse_classify_store (, stmt, false, NULL, NULL, latch_vdef)
== DSE_STORE_DEAD)
delete_dead_or_redundant_assignment (, "dead");
gsi_next ();
continue;
which
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 13:21, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Leaving the main review to Richard, just some comments...
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > @@ -9774,6 +9777,10 @@ vect_is_simple_cond (tree cond, vec_info *vinfo,
> >
> > When STMT_INFO i
On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 16:08, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 1:42 AM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 09:17, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 08:54, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>
301 - 400 of 988 matches
Mail list logo
