On 05/08/2015 09:43 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
@@ -1509,8 +1509,7 @@
(and:DI (ashift:DI (match_operand:DI 1 register_operand r)
(match_operand:DI 2 mul8_operand I))
(match_operand:DI 3 immediate_operand i)))]
- HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT == 64
-
; asm( : =@cc#C(r)); return r; } \
int j##C(void) { int r; asm( : =@cc#C(r)); if (!r) bar(); }
#define DO2(C) DO1(C) DO1(n##C)
DO2(a)
DO2(b)
DO2(c)
DO2(e)
DO2(g)
DO2(l)
DO2(o)
DO2(p)
DO2(s)
DO2(z)
DO2(ae)
DO2(be)
DO2(ge)
DO2(le)
---
Richard Henderson (6):
Only resolve_asm_operand_names once
We do it in the front end already; no need to repeat.
---
gcc/cfgexpand.c | 2 --
gcc/stmt.c | 7 ---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/cfgexpand.c b/gcc/cfgexpand.c
index 5905ddb..c77a4ac 100644
--- a/gcc/cfgexpand.c
+++ b/gcc/cfgexpand.c
@@ -2554,8
All jcc mnemonics implemented as =@
to make it easy for someone reading the manual
to figure out what condition is desired.
---
gcc/config/i386/constraints.md | 5 ++
gcc/config/i386/i386.c | 132 ++---
2 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 7
For testing parity coming out of asm flags.
---
gcc/config/i386/i386-modes.def | 2 ++
gcc/config/i386/i386.c | 19 +++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-modes.def b/gcc/config/i386/i386-modes.def
index 0b6a1f1..714c138
Prepatory to converting from tree chains to vectors.
---
gcc/cfgexpand.c | 167
1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/cfgexpand.c b/gcc/cfgexpand.c
index c77a4ac..a5de512 100644
--- a/gcc/cfgexpand.c
+++
If gimple_asm_volatile_p is correct, no point re-checking.
This is also done by the C and C++ front ends, but not Ada.
So we can't yet trust ASM_VOLATILE_P from the front end.
---
gcc/cfgexpand.c | 11 +++
gcc/gimplify.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff
Using proper vectors instead of lists of trees.
---
gcc/cfgexpand.c | 614 ---
gcc/config/cris/cris.c | 88 +++
gcc/config/i386/i386.c | 24 +-
gcc/config/mn10300/mn10300.c | 20 +-
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c | 17 +-
On 04/30/2015 09:26 AM, Caroline Tice wrote:
2015-04-30 Caroline Tice cmt...@google.com
PR 65929
* config/elfos.h (ASM_DECLARE_COLD_FUNCTION_NAME): New macro definition.
(ASM_DECLARE_COLD_FUNCTION_SIZE): New macro definition.
* doc/tm.texi.in (ASM_DECLARE_COLD_FUNCTION_NAME): Document
On 04/24/2015 10:52 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
In the debug-early work we call dwarf2out early from
rest_of_decl_compilation.
Dwarf2out, via gen_struct_or_union_type_die(), will eventually look at
TYPE_VFIELD, which is currently being overloaded by the C front-end to keep
incomplete
On 04/03/2015 07:13 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/atomic
@@ -165,9 +165,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
struct atomic
{
private:
- // Align 1/2/4/8/16-byte types the same as integer types of that size.
+ // Align 1/2/4/8/16-byte
On 03/31/2015 06:41 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This is the best I've come up with, does anyone have any better ideas
than the #else branch to hardcode alignment of 16-byte types to 16?
If there's no 16 byte type, are we convinced this matters? I mean, there isn't
a 16-byte atomic instruction
On 03/31/2015 08:03 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 31/03/15 07:54 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 03/31/2015 06:41 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This is the best I've come up with, does anyone have any better ideas
than the #else branch to hardcode alignment of 16-byte types to 16?
If there's
On 03/06/2015 05:42 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
gcc/
PR target/65248
* output.h (default_binds_local_p_2): New.
* varasm.c (default_binds_local_p_2): Renamed to ...
(default_binds_local_p_3): This. Don't return true on protected
data symbol if protected data may be
On 03/25/2015 11:49 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25/03/15 11:36 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 03/25/2015 09:22 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25/03/15 11:39 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 03/25/2015 09:22 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
+static_assert( alignof(std::atomictwoints) alignof
On 03/25/2015 09:22 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
private:
- _Tp _M_i;
+ // Align 1/2/4/8/16-byte types the same as integer types of that size.
+ // This matches the alignment effects of the C11 _Atomic qualifier.
+ static constexpr int _S_alignment
+ = sizeof(_Tp)
On 03/25/2015 09:22 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
+static_assert( alignof(std::atomictwoints) alignof(int),
+ std::atomic not suitably aligned );
This is only true if int64_t has alignment larger than int32_t,
which is unfortunately not always the case.
r~
On 03/02/2015 10:42 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
gcc/
* builtins.c (expand_builtin_return_addr): Add
RETURN_ADDR_IN_PREVIOUS_FRAME to 'if' condition, remove
surrounding #ifdef.
* config/sparc/sparc.h (RETURN_ADDR_IN_PREVIOUS_FRAME): Change
definition to 1.
*
On 03/02/2015 10:55 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Do you actually need the reload completed? Couldn't this be legitimately
split
before reload (and then parts of it DCE'd as necessary)?
Otherwise, the split condition does need as mentioned by Uros.
Oh, I forgot -- even if you can exclude
On 03/02/2015 09:55 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 02/26/2015 05:46 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
+;; Optimize division or modulo by constant power of 2, if the constant
+;; materializes only after expansion.
+(define_insn_and_split *udivmodmode4_pow2
+ [(set (match_operand:SWI48 0
On 02/27/2015 05:11 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/25/2015 09:02 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
The patch was tested on alpha-linux-gnu and alphaev68-linux-gnu for
all default languages plus obj-c++ and go.
OK for mainline?
Ok
On 02/26/2015 05:46 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
+;; Optimize division or modulo by constant power of 2, if the constant
+;; materializes only after expansion.
+(define_insn_and_split *udivmodmode4_pow2
+ [(set (match_operand:SWI48 0 register_operand =r)
+ (udiv:SWI48 (match_operand:SWI48 2
On 03/02/2015 10:25 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 03/02/2015 09:55 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 02/26/2015 05:46 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
+;; Optimize division or modulo by constant power of 2, if the constant
+;; materializes only after expansion.
+(define_insn_and_split
On 02/25/2015 09:02 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
The patch was tested on alpha-linux-gnu and alphaev68-linux-gnu for
all default languages plus obj-c++ and go.
OK for mainline?
Ok. Thanks.
r~
On 02/19/2015 01:04 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
2015-02-19 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/alpha/alpha.c (alpha_in_small_data_p): Reject common symbols.
Ok. Thanks.
r~
On 02/19/2015 09:08 AM, Alex Velenko wrote:
Your suggestion seem to fix gcc.target/arm/long-calls-1.c, but has to be
thoroughly tested.
Before you do complete testing, please also delete the TREE_STATIC test.
That bit should never be relevant to functions, as it indicates not that
it is in the
On 02/18/2015 06:17 AM, Alex Velenko wrote:
By changing behaviour of varasm.c:default_binds_local_p, this patch changes
behaviour of gcc/config/arm/arm.c:arm_function_in_section_p and through it
breaks gcc/config/arm/arm.c:arm_is_long_call_p for weak symbols.
As a result, I get regression
On 02/18/2015 05:18 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
PR target/65064
* config/ia64/predicates.md (sdata_symbolic_operand): Return false
for common symbols.
Ok.
r~
On 02/16/2015 06:01 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
2015-02-12 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com
PR rtl/32219
* cgraphunit.c (cgraph_node::finalize_function): Set
On 02/14/2015 06:50 AM, John David Anglin wrote:
Possibly the constant can somehow be forced into the data section where the
relocations
aren't a problem?
Hmm. It looks like we might already do that. See default_select_rtx_section.
r~
On 02/13/2015 05:22 AM, John David Anglin wrote:
+ /* Reload sometimes tries to put const data symbolic operands in
+ readonly memory. The HP SOM linker doesn't allow symbolic data
+ in readonly memory. */
+ if (TARGET_SOM
+ !function_label_operand (x, VOIDmode)
+
On 02/13/2015 08:26 AM, Renlin Li wrote:
+ /* Complete overlap. We can remove the source ZERO_EXTEND. */
+ if (width == inner_size
+(regno FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER)
+HARD_REGNO_MODE_OK (regno, mode))
+ {
+ rtx reg = gen_rtx_REG (mode, regno);
+ return
On 02/12/2015 10:58 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
if (DECL_VISIBILITY_SPECIFIED (exp)
+ (resolved_locally
+ || !flag_pic
Yes, this essentially goes back to your original patch, which I claim still
conflates issues.
In particular, I believe mentioning flag_pic here is a serious error.
On 02/12/2015 01:23 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Ok for trunk?
2015-02-12 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
PR sanitizer/65000
* g++.dg/ubsan/pr65000.C: New test.
Yes, thanks.
I was still trying to generate a pure C++ testcase, without -fsanitize.
Ah well...
r~
On 02/03/2015 06:29 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Represents the @code{fma}, @code{fmaf}, and @code{fmal} builtin
-functions that do a combined multiply of @var{x} and @var{y} and then
-adding to@var{z} without doing an intermediate rounding step.
+functions, which compute @samp{@var{x} *
On 02/12/2015 01:25 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
This patch tweaks the pr47573.C testcase, so that it is run only on
comdat_group target. It is true that comdat_group is stricter than
comdat, but we don't have an effective-target for the latter and I'm not
sure what exactly to test for.
When we fixed PR54005, making sure that atomic_is_lock_free returns the same
value for all objects of a given type, we probably should have changed the
interface so that we would pass size and alignment rather than size and object
pointer.
Instead, we decided that passing null for the object
On 02/12/2015 03:05 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
@@ -6830,9 +6830,15 @@ default_binds_local_p_2 (const_tree exp, bool shlib,
bool weak_dominate)
bool resolved_locally = false;
if (symtab_node *node = symtab_node::get (exp))
{
- /* When not building shared library and weak_dominate is
On 02/10/2015 01:19 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
As an existing issue, I'm not sure why specified visibility is any different
from unspecified visibility. As far as I'm aware, the specified bit simply
means that the decl doesn't inherit inherit visibility from the class, or from
the command
On 02/09/2015 12:40 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
#ifndef LIBFFI_ASM
+#ifdef __ILP32__
+typedef unsigned long long ffi_arg;
+typedef signed long long ffi_sarg;
+#else
You need to set FFI_SIZEOF_ARG too.
Otherwise it looks ok.
r~
On 02/09/2015 12:51 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
Would it make more sense to use int64_t rather than long long?
Probably, but we should do that all over libffi, rather than just this one hunk.
r~
On 02/10/2015 11:02 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
+#define FFI_SIZEOF_JAVA_RAW 4
Since aarch64 doesn't implement the raw java api, this is irrelevant.
r~
On 02/07/2015 08:45 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
Here is an updated patch.
This is an annoying comment to differentiate 3 different versions, FYI.
@@ -6826,11 +6817,18 @@ default_binds_local_p_1 (const_tree exp, int shlib)
(TREE_STATIC (exp) || DECL_EXTERNAL (exp)))
{
varpool_node
On 02/09/2015 11:51 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
We reject the following testcase in C99 mode, because in C99 we always
wrap COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR in a SAVE_EXPR when initializing a range of
elements, even though the expression is required to be constant. As a
consequence, we error out with
On 02/09/2015 11:10 AM, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
+@table @code
+@findex ltgt
+@cindex less than or greater than
+@item (ltgt:@var{m} @var{x} @var{y})
+@code{STORE_FLAG_VALUE} if the values represented by @var{x} and
+@var{y} are less, or greater, otherwise 0. This is a quiet operation
+that
On 02/05/2015 04:18 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
OK when stage1 opens?
* function.h (struct emit_status): Delete x_first_insn, x_last_insn
and sequence_stack. Add seq.
(seq_stack): Delete.
* function.c (prepare_function_start): Don't access x_last_insn.
* emit-rtl.h
On 02/04/2015 03:29 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
+++ b/gcc/varasm.c
@@ -6826,11 +6826,17 @@ default_binds_local_p_1 (const_tree exp, int shlib)
(TREE_STATIC (exp) || DECL_EXTERNAL (exp)))
{
varpool_node *vnode = varpool_node::get (exp);
- if (vnode (resolution_local_p
On 02/05/2015 11:01 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
Can you elaborate why it depends on COPY relocation? There
is no COPY relocation on x86-64.
Ho hum, we appear to have switched topics mid-thread.
I agree that we cannot override a weak symbol in the executable with even a
non-weak symbol in a shared
On 01/30/2015 12:40 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On January 30, 2015 9:18:57 PM CET, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/30/2015 12:12 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jan 30, 2015, at 9:52 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 09:45:26AM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
I
On 01/30/2015 09:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
+hash_maptree, tree *deep_ter_debug_map;
Any reason this data can't be static?
Otherwise, ok.
r~
On 01/30/2015 04:52 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
When running natively on AArch64 the preprocessor did not use the
AdvSIMD optimized search_line_fast function, because it was ifdefed
around by __ARM_NEON__ instead of __ARM_NEON.
Yes, sorry I didn't follow up on that from September:
On 01/30/2015 12:12 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jan 30, 2015, at 9:52 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 09:45:26AM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
I have a port that has:
(insn 47 46 48 18 (parallel [
(unspec_volatile:DI [
(const_int 128
On 01/29/2015 01:10 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
On 28 Jan 2015, at 18:16, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 01/28/2015 10:10 AM, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
I can't think of any reason they shouldn't work. Were they not running
before,
or did something else change?
AFAIU the commit, the tests
On 01/29/2015 01:53 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
PR libffi/64855
* testsuite/lib/libffi.exp: Don't set targetabis on darwin.
Ok.
r~
On 01/28/2015 10:10 AM, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
I can't think of any reason they shouldn't work. Were they not running
before,
or did something else change?
AFAIU the commit, the tests were not run on x86_64-*-*, so the tests and the
corresponding failures are new.
Well, the commit
On 01/28/2015 06:28 AM, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
This patch worked for me. Ok for mainline now? (r220158)
This causes 340 new tests on darwin with -m32, 255 of them failing when
executes,
see https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-01/msg03197.html.
Are the tests with
On 01/26/2015 06:19 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
2015-01-16 Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de
* testsuite/lib/libffi.exp: Load target-supports.exp.
(run-many-tests): Only set targetabis for ia32.
Ok.
r~
On 01/23/2015 10:22 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
2015-01-23 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
PR driver/64737
* gcc.c (print_configuration): Don't print a blank line at the end
here...
(run_attempt): ... but here unstead.
Ok.
r~
On 01/15/2015 12:13 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:46:18AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
That last line means the compiler is free to delete a non-volatile
asm with a memory clobber if that asm is not needed for dataflow. Or
that is how I read it; it is trying to indicate
On 01/22/2015 09:34 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR 64722
* emit-rtl.c (init_emit_regs): Set pic_offset_table_rtx to
NULL_RTX before testing PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM, since the
latter may be affected by the former (e.g. on i686).
Ok.
r~
On 01/21/2015 11:52 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On January 21, 2015 10:23:56 PM CET, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 12/29/2014 06:04 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Since 16bit byteswap can be done via an 8 bit rotation (and it is the
canonical form),
the check for an optab only
On 01/20/2015 02:10 PM, Andrew Waterman wrote:
2015-01-09 Andrew Waterman water...@cs.berkeley.edu
* fop_n.c (libat_fetch_op): Align address to word boundary.
(libat_op_fetch): Likewise.
Thanks. Applied to 4.8, 4.9, and mainline branches.
r~
As discussed in the PR, we're committing a layering violation here.
Removing that violation fixes the ICE, which is the most important
thing for the moment.
Reviewing objdump of the stage3 cc1plus, about 90% of the instances
of ccmp instruction are followed by a conditional branch, so combine
is
On 01/21/2015 08:16 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
2015-01-21 Segher Boessenkool seg...@kernel.crashing.org
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/64682
* combine.c (distribute_notes): When moving a death note for
a register that is set in the new I2, make sure to put it
before
On 01/21/2015 01:30 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2015-01-21 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
PR debug/64511
* simplify-rtx.c (simplify_relational_operation_1): Don't try to
optimize (eq/ne (and
On 12/29/2014 06:04 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Since 16bit byteswap can be done via an 8 bit rotation (and it is the
canonical form),
the check for an optab only serves to prevent the bswap optimization for
targets that don't have a 16bit byteswap (but do have a rotation
instruction).
On 01/21/2015 01:36 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2015-01-21 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
PR rtl-optimization/62078
* dse.c: Include cfgcleanup.h.
(rest_of_handle_dse): For -fnon-call-exceptions, if DSE
On 01/20/2015 03:30 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
2015-01-20 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
PR debug/64663
* dwarf2out.c (decl_piece_node): Don't put bitsize into
mode if bitsize = 0.
(decl_piece_bitsize, adjust_piece_list, add_var_loc_to_decl,
dw_sra_loc_expr):
One of the few changes to libffi.exp that we picked up
that looked quite logical. But I guess it turns out that
we haven't properly configured the c++ compiler in dejagnu
for libffi.
Easiest thing to do is just revert this hunk.
r~
PR libffi/64581
* testsuite/lib/libffi.exp
On 01/19/2015 02:26 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Ian Lance Taylor i...@golang.org writes:
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
#else /* !defined(USE_LIBFFI_CLOSURES) */
void
-makeFuncFFI(const struct __go_func_type *ftyp, ffi_go_closure *impl)
+makeFuncFFI(const struct __go_func_type *ftyp, void *impl)
{
On 01/19/2015 10:11 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Attached is a more conservative v2 patch that conditionally enables
fixup code when FFI_TARGET_HAS_COMPLEX_TYPE is not defined.
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu {-m32} without regressions.
I don't think this version should be required.
For x86,
On 01/17/2015 01:52 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
../../../libgo/go/reflect/makefunc_ffi_c.c:21:53: error: unknown type name
'ffi_go_closure'
void makeFuncFFI(const struct __go_func_type *ftyp, ffi_go_closure *impl)
^
On 01/17/2015 11:07 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com writes:
On 01/17/2015 01:52 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
../../../libgo/go/reflect/makefunc_ffi_c.c:21:53: error: unknown type name
'ffi_go_closure'
void makeFuncFFI(const struct __go_func_type *ftyp
On 01/17/2015 02:07 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/17/2015 11:07 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Richard
On 01/16/2015 09:47 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
2015-01-16 Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com
* reorg.c (fill_simple_delay_slots): If TARGET_FLAGS_REGNUM is valid,
implement a more precise life analysis for it during backward scan.
Ok.
r~
On 01/15/2015 08:40 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
* on Solaris/SPARC, /bin/as requires
.type fn,#function
Gas accepts this as well, so let's just use that.
* Yet unfixed for Solaris/SPARC /bin/as:
as: v8.s, line 128: error: invalid digit in radix 10
as seems to only understand
The glibc setcontext modifies %g7, so the SETCONTEXT_CLOBBERS_TLS configure
test triggers.
My guess is that Solaris doesn't clobber %g7, or Rainer would have noticed this
before. Is it worth also checking for __linux__ in the elif test, or just wait
until someone notices that they have an
On 12/15/2014 12:41 AM, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
+(define_expand cmpmode
+ [(set (match_operand 0 cc_register )
+(match_operator:CC 1 aarch64_comparison_operator
+ [(match_operand:GPI 2 register_operand )
+ (match_operand:GPI 3 aarch64_plus_operand )]))]
+
+
+
On 01/15/2015 08:54 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Rainer Orth
r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com writes:
Upstream libffi has added support for Go closures (using the static chain),
and support for complex numbers. Perhaps less
On 01/15/2015 08:40 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
The patch introduced massive problems on Solaris, both SPARC and x86:
* on Solaris/SPARC, /bin/as requires
.type fn,#function
instead of @function. I've simply commented the affected lines in
src/sparc/v[89].S to make progress.
*
On 01/15/2015 02:47 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Rainer Orth
r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com writes:
Upstream libffi has added support for Go closures (using the static chain),
and support for complex numbers. Perhaps less
All of this has been posted before.
I believe the ABI change is something we should have for gcc 5.
Yes, the libffi merge has been causing problems (on targets that
don't even support libgo, annoyingly), but missing support for
the new libffi interfaces is easier to remedy in a dot release
than
On 12/15/2014 07:36 AM, Jiong Wang wrote:
+ char buf[64];
+ uint64_t val = ((uint64_t) 1) UINTVAL (operands[1]);
+ sprintf (buf, tst\t%%w0, %PRId64, val);
+ output_asm_insn (buf, operands);
+ return bcond\t%l2;
Better to simply modify the operand, as in
operands[1] =
On 01/14/2015 03:27 AM, Venkataramanan Kumar wrote:
next_code = (code == MEM ? MEM
: ((code == PLUS || code == MINUS)
- SCALAR_INT_MODE_P (mode)) ? MEM
+ SCALAR_INT_MODE_P (mode)
+ (in_code == MEM)) ? MEM
:
On 01/12/2015 09:38 PM, Kaz Kojima wrote:
2015-01-13 Kaz Kojima kkoj...@gcc.gnu.org
* configure.host: Remove extra brackets for sh.
Ok, thanks.
r~
On 01/13/2015 07:35 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
Can I apply it to GCC trunk?
Please.
r~
On 01/12/2015 03:46 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:42 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
This libffi commit:
13e2d7b92557a9511a0414df82bf2df3edc55cba is the first bad commit
commit 13e2d7b92557a9511a0414df82bf2df3edc55cba
Author: Anthony Green gr...@moxielogic.com
Date:
On 01/12/2015 04:57 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
The problem is my x86_64-*-linux-gnux32 patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg01083.html
was never accepted upstream. Can I apply it to config.guess
in GCC?
Ah. Hmm. Perhaps the configure.host patch would be better after all.
r~
On 01/12/2015 11:08 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
Upstream libffi has added support for Go closures (using the static chain),
and support for complex numbers. Perhaps less relevant is new support for
arc, microblaze, moxie, nios, and or1k targets.
Without additional changes for Go, this
On 12/15/2014 03:42 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:14:21AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 12/12/2014 04:06 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
I'm not sure I've posted the missing patch anywhere yet, so it's
attached to this message. At the moment it enables
FFI_TYPE_COMPLEX only
On 12/12/2014 04:06 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
I'm not sure I've posted the missing patch anywhere yet, so it's
attached to this message. At the moment it enables
FFI_TYPE_COMPLEX only for s390[x], but eventually this should be
used unconditionally.
Thanks for that. I'd been meaning to get
On 12/12/2014 05:57 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 07:51:44PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
I was worried about exactly the same problem on powerpc with r11
being used for the static chain and also destroyed in linkage stubs.
It turns out we don't traverse any linkage stubs.
See
- tree lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (g);
enum machine_mode mode = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (lhs));
rtx target = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
+
+ start_sequence ();
tmp = emit_cstore (target, icode, NE, cc_mode, cc_mode,
0, tmp, const0_rtx, 1,
On 12/11/2014 01:06 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
reflect.call
../../../libgo/runtime/go-reflect-call.c:216
reflect.call.N13_reflect.Value
GCCDIR/build-go-closure/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libgo/gotest30365/test/value.go:579
reflect.Call.N13_reflect.Value
On 12/11/2014 04:25 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
Update: If I disable the custom s390x code and switch to the
implementation just using libffi for reflection calls, the same
crash occurs with the testing/quick libgo test case. The called
function sees a bogus value written by the synamic linker
On 12/10/2014 06:08 AM, Blumental Maxim wrote:
We have ~30 groups of similar (i.e.having similar sets of attributes)
named patterns. These groups together include ~230 template (i.e.
having substitution attributes in their names) named patterns in
total. So, we can reduce the amount of
On 12/04/2014 01:49 AM, Ilya Tocar wrote:
+ if (!TARGET_AVX512BW || !(d-vmode == V64QImode))
Please don't over-complicate the expression.
Use x != y instead of !(x == y).
r~
On 12/09/2014 07:59 AM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
However patch is fixing spec2006 benchmark. Shouldn't that be enough
for regression testing?
No. Spec is not free.
r~
On 12/09/2014 06:53 AM, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
2014-12-09 Varvara Rainchik varvara.rainc...@intel.com
* config.h.in: Regenerate.
* configure: Regenerate.
* configure.ac: Add GCC_CHECK_EMUTLS.
* libgomp.h: Add check for USE_EMUTLS: this case
is
On 12/08/2014 06:25 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
Okay. I don't know of another option that preserves backward
compatibility. If RTH looks at this series of patches, he may have a
better suggestion.
No, this looks like what I'd do.
Indeed, I added this hook back when the i386 port gained direct
401 - 500 of 2511 matches
Mail list logo
