Hi Christian,
On 4 May 2015 at 11:29, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
Hi Christian,
I noticed case gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c failed on aarch64. The
original patch is x86 specific, while the case is added as general
one. Could you please have a look at this?
FAIL:
thanks for the validation and the confirmation that iinline-attr.c is
now fixed on aarch64. I can now send the patch for submission request
(this one was just illustrative).
thanks
Christian
On 05/05/2015 11:10 AM, Yvan Roux wrote:
Hi Christian,
On 4 May 2015 at 11:29, Christian Bruel
Hi Christian,
I noticed case gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c failed on aarch64. The
original patch is x86 specific, while the case is added as general
one. Could you please have a look at this?
FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c scan-ipa-dump inline
hooray[^\\n]*inline copy in test
that is
OK I've have a look,
thanks
Christian
On 04/30/2015 10:27 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com
wrote:
While trying to reduce the PR64835 case for ARM and x86, I
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com
wrote:
While trying to reduce the PR64835 case for ARM and x86, I noticed that the
alignment flags are cleared for x86 when attribute optimized is used.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
While trying to reduce the PR64835 case for ARM and x86, I noticed that the
alignment flags are cleared for x86 when attribute optimized is used.
With the attached testcases, the visible effects are twofold :
1)
While trying to reduce the PR64835 case for ARM and x86, I noticed that
the alignment flags are cleared for x86 when attribute optimized is used.
With the attached testcases, the visible effects are twofold :
1) Functions compiled in with attribute optimize (-O2) are not aligned
as if they
