> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 9:03 PM Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hello David.
>> Thanks for the patch.
>>
>> OK.
>
> Picking a random patch/mail for this question - how do we maintain BPF
> support for the most recent GCC release which is GCC 13? I see the
> current state
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 9:03 PM Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
>
> Hello David.
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> OK.
Picking a random patch/mail for this question - how do we maintain BPF
support for the most recent GCC release which is GCC 13? I see the
current state in GCC 13 isn't
Hello David.
Thanks for the patch.
OK.
> In the BPF pseudo-c assembly dialect, registers treated as 32-bits
> rather than the full 64 in various instructions ought to be printed as
> "wN" rather than "rN". But bpf_print_register () was only doing this
> for specifically SImode registers,
In the BPF pseudo-c assembly dialect, registers treated as 32-bits
rather than the full 64 in various instructions ought to be printed as
"wN" rather than "rN". But bpf_print_register () was only doing this
for specifically SImode registers, meaning smaller modes were printed
incorrectly.
This
