On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 17:06, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 18:22, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >> > On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 16:59, Richard Sandiford
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks for fixing this.
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 18:22, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> > On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 16:59, Richard Sandiford
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for fixing this.
>> >>
>> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> >> > diff --git
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 18:22, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 16:59, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks for fixing this.
> >>
> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >> > diff --git a/gcc/simplify-rtx.c b/gcc/simplify-rtx.c
> >> > index
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 16:59, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for fixing this.
>>
>> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> > diff --git a/gcc/simplify-rtx.c b/gcc/simplify-rtx.c
>> > index 89a46a933fa..79bd0cfbd28 100644
>> > --- a/gcc/simplify-rtx.c
>> > +++
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 16:59, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Thanks for fixing this.
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > diff --git a/gcc/simplify-rtx.c b/gcc/simplify-rtx.c
> > index 89a46a933fa..79bd0cfbd28 100644
> > --- a/gcc/simplify-rtx.c
> > +++ b/gcc/simplify-rtx.c
> > @@ -6697,6 +6697,19
Thanks for fixing this.
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/simplify-rtx.c b/gcc/simplify-rtx.c
> index 89a46a933fa..79bd0cfbd28 100644
> --- a/gcc/simplify-rtx.c
> +++ b/gcc/simplify-rtx.c
> @@ -6697,6 +6697,19 @@ simplify_subreg (machine_mode outermode, rtx op,
> }
> }
>
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 23:45, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 16:05, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >> > On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 20:05, Richard Sandiford
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 16:05, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> > On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 20:05, Richard Sandiford
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> >> > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 21:41, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>> >> >
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 16:05, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 20:05, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >> > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 21:41, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, 24 Jun
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 20:05, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 21:41, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 19:51, Richard Sandiford
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Prathamesh
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 20:05, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 21:41, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 19:51, Richard Sandiford
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >> > > @@ -1415,6 +1460,19
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 21:41, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 19:51, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> > > @@ -1415,6 +1460,19 @@ forward_propagate_into (df_ref use)
>> > >if (!def_set)
>> > >
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 21:41, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 19:51, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
> >
> > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > > @@ -1415,6 +1460,19 @@ forward_propagate_into (df_ref use)
> > >if (!def_set)
> > > return false;
> > >
> > > + if
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 19:51, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > @@ -1415,6 +1460,19 @@ forward_propagate_into (df_ref use)
> >if (!def_set)
> > return false;
> >
> > + if (reg_prop_only
> > + && !REG_P (SET_SRC (def_set))
> > + && !REG_P (SET_DEST
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> @@ -1415,6 +1460,19 @@ forward_propagate_into (df_ref use)
>if (!def_set)
> return false;
>
> + if (reg_prop_only
> + && !REG_P (SET_SRC (def_set))
> + && !REG_P (SET_DEST (def_set)))
> +return false;
This should be:
if (reg_prop_only
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 14:59, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > diff --git a/gcc/fwprop.c b/gcc/fwprop.c
> > index 45703fe5f01..93a1a10c9a6 100644
> > --- a/gcc/fwprop.c
> > +++ b/gcc/fwprop.c
> > @@ -547,6 +547,54 @@ propagate_rtx_1 (rtx *px, rtx old_rtx, rtx new_rtx,
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/fwprop.c b/gcc/fwprop.c
> index 45703fe5f01..93a1a10c9a6 100644
> --- a/gcc/fwprop.c
> +++ b/gcc/fwprop.c
> @@ -547,6 +547,54 @@ propagate_rtx_1 (rtx *px, rtx old_rtx, rtx new_rtx, int
> flags)
> tem = simplify_gen_subreg (mode, op0,
Hi,
The attached patch tries to fix PR88833.
For the following test-case:
subroutine foo(x)
real :: x(100)
x = x + 10
end subroutine foo
Assembly with -O3 -march=armv8.2-a+sve:
foo_:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
mov w2, 100
mov w3, w2
mov x1, 0
18 matches
Mail list logo
