Cilk Plus has been deprecated more than two years ago and not seen
development on the GCC side for a while, too.
The certificate for www.cilkplus.org expired four weeks ago, so
remove our link there as we move the Cilk Plus entry to the section
of Inactive Development branches.
---
htdocs/git.htm
On Mon, 28 Dec 2020, Eric Gallager wrote:
>> (cf. https://gcc.gnu.org/about.html and I'm happy to help).
> I haven't made a commit to the wwwdocs repo yet, and the last time I
> committed to the main gcc sources repo it was before the transition
> to git, and I did it from a different computer, a
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 1:50 PM Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Cilk Plus has been deprecated more than two years ago and not seen
> development on the GCC side for a while, too.
>
> The certificate for www.cilkplus.org expired four weeks ago, so
> remove our link there as we move the Cilk Plus entry to
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 1:59 PM Eric Gallager wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 1:50 PM Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>
>> Cilk Plus has been deprecated more than two years ago and not seen
>> development on the GCC side for a while, too.
>>
>> The certificate for www.cilkplus.org expired four weeks ago,
On Sun, 27 Dec 2020, Eric Gallager wrote:
> If it's now inactive, maybe also reword the description to change tense
> from present to past?
> i.e.:
Yes...
> cilkplus
> This branch was for the development of the now-obsolete Cilk Plus
> language extension support for the GCC and G++ compilers. Th
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 6:55 PM Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020, Eric Gallager wrote:
> > If it's now inactive, maybe also reword the description to change tense
> > from present to past?
> > i.e.:
>
> Yes...
>
> > cilkplus
> > This branch was for the development of the now-obsolete C
