On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 02:32:36PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 3/13/19 1:25 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > This PR points out that our P0634 implementation misses constructor
> > parameters
> > and still requires 'typename'. I'm not 100% sure if the standard really
> > says
> > we should
On 3/13/19 1:25 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
This PR points out that our P0634 implementation misses constructor parameters
and still requires 'typename'. I'm not 100% sure if the standard really says
we should also handle constructors. Does a constructor have a function type?
Not that we can
This PR points out that our P0634 implementation misses constructor parameters
and still requires 'typename'. I'm not 100% sure if the standard really says
we should also handle constructors. Does a constructor have a function type?
But I guess it makes sense, so this patch handles it. To
