On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 23:58 +0200, Ilan Barak wrote:
on opensuse 10.2 and 10.3
installed from RPM
add component opens a component selection box, and lists all the
available libraries.
selecting a library doesn't open the list of options
Did you click the arrow expander on the library?
Hi all,
I'm using gschem + PCB (version 20070208) for a project with some 150
components on a 100x160 mm single-sided circuit board. There are several
polygons, a few (locked) mounting holes, and a fair number of
user-defined footprints.
Up until today, PCB was rock solid, but out of the blue,
Thanks Peter,
this fixes my problem
cheers
ilan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Peter Clifton
Sent: Mon 2/4/2008 17:44
To: gEDA user mailing list
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: please help - can't browse symbols ingschem
1.4.0.20080127
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 18:29 +0100, Richard Rasker wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using gschem + PCB (version 20070208)
You will almost certainly benefit from an upgrade to the latest release,
20080202.
As for why it just started happen, good guesses would include a bad
polygon in the design, perhaps
On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 16:52 -0900, Britton Kerin wrote:
I have a design with two subcircuits. I pretty much copied the gTAG
example but I missed the trick of making a netname=foo wire in the
toplevel and then putting an input or output with refdes=foo in the
subdesigns, so my +3.3V isn't
Op maandag 04-02-2008 om 13:03 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef DJ Delorie:
The way to tell what's happening is to run pcb under gdb:
$ gdb pcb
...
(gdb) run myboard.pcb
...
segfault
(gdb) where
... lots of stack dump stuff ...
Ah, I think I see what I did wrong:
Program received signal
I did grep -Ri vdd * in the base directory of symbols.
I noticed the net=Vdd thing, but in connection with something weird in
4000/. All of these symbols include a net=VDD:?? statement.
Does anybody use 4000 series CMOS anymore?
But no matter. these net= callouts are attaching the net
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Stuart Brorson wrote:
I think I uncovered a subtle bug. I replaced Vdd, Vee, and Vcc with +8V,
-8V, and +5V respectively and the problem disappeared. I can't seem to
come up with a simple test case though.
Just a guess. Take a look through your symbols. I'll betcha
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 16:13 -0500, Ian Chapman wrote:
You might want to try a more recent PCB; this was a common problem a
while back.
Thanks JD, did the September 07 release fix it if not I'll get the Jan 08?
Use the 08 version, it fixes a whole bunch of nasty issues.
--
Peter Clifton
In recent PCBs, there are settings to force the crosshair to ignore
all text, or ignore everything except text.
Is there a gui click or is it a command to enter? Regards Ian
Menu option.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Stuart Brorson wrote:
I did grep -Ri vdd * in the base directory of symbols.
I noticed the net=Vdd thing, but in connection with something weird in
4000/. All of these symbols include a net=VDD:?? statement.
Does anybody use 4000 series CMOS anymore?
They're the
On Feb 4, 2008 6:44 PM, David Griffith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Stuart Brorson wrote:
This created an interesting problem with power/vdd-1.sym which has
net=Vdd:1. These statements are not case-insensitive.
If you are using the vdd-1.sym symbol in your design, then
You might want to try a more recent PCB; this was a common problem a
while back.
Thanks JD, did the September 07 release fix it if not I'll get the Jan 08?
In recent PCBs, there are settings to force the crosshair to ignore
all text, or ignore everything except text.
Is there a gui click or is
On Feb 4, 2008, at 3:41 PM, Stuart Brorson wrote:
I did grep -Ri vdd * in the base directory of symbols.
I noticed the net=Vdd thing, but in connection with something
weird in
4000/. All of these symbols include a net=VDD:?? statement.
Does anybody use 4000 series CMOS anymore?
Yes:
On Feb 4, 2008, at 4:44 PM, David Griffith wrote:
They're the 4016 (Quad analogue switch) and the 4052 (Dual 1/4 CMOS
MUX).
Can you can suggest suitable 74xx series equivalents? I'm working
from a
10-15 year old schematic.
There are thousands, most not 74xxx numbers, but a very wide
John -
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 06:13:51PM -0700, John Doty wrote:
Does anybody use 4000 series CMOS anymore?
Yes:
Slow interfaces on noisy cables.
Simple logic on unregulated power.
Radiation tolerant circuits.
High voltage mixed signal circuits.
/me nods head
Right, where high
16 matches
Mail list logo
