On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 10:33 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 20:45 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:57 PM, DJ Delorie [1...@delorie.com wrote:
It only has to live a couple of hours
I've made circuits like that. Not always intentionally,
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 20:45 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:57 PM, DJ Delorie [1...@delorie.com wrote:
It only has to live a couple of hours
I've made circuits like that. Not always intentionally, though.
You can buy parts from Vishay that do rapid
I compile OK from pcjc2's cairo_place_lines branch,
but when I cloned http://git.gpleda.org/, made a new branch from master It
stops at libgeda with errors.
Is master the right branch to use?
John
--
Ecosensory Austin TX
___
geda-user mailing
On Wednesday 14 January 2009 15:29:40 John Griessen wrote:
I compile OK from pcjc2's cairo_place_lines branch,
but when I cloned http://git.gpleda.org/, made a new branch from master It
stops at libgeda with errors.
What sort of errors?
Is master the right branch to use?
Yes, it is.
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 09:29 -0600, John Griessen wrote:
I compile OK from pcjc2's cairo_place_lines branch,
but when I cloned http://git.gpleda.org/, made a new branch from master It
stops at libgeda with errors.
Is master the right branch to use?
master is good. It now has far more
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:58:40 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
Just tried this route to get a fresh geda from git:
$ git clone git://git.gpleda.org/gaf
$ cd gaf
$ gedit Makefile# change destination dir
$ make reconfig
$ make install
However, make install produced a syntax error during config:
$
On Jan 13, 2009, at 1:47 PM, Joerg wrote:
John Doty wrote:
Then we are working in different worlds.
And that is my point. gEDA has to be flexible to accommodate the
needs of different worlds, rather than some specific narrow channel.
But at least we both worked
with CCD imagers :-)
On Jan 13, 2009, at 5:12 PM, r wrote:
BTW, analog IC guys long since have given up using implicit power
connections
Another sweeping statement from a narrow point of view, I think. A
counter-example is in order:
http://research.kek.jp/people/ikeda/openIP/
If you can't read Japanese, just
John Doty wrote:
On Jan 13, 2009, at 5:12 PM, r wrote:
BTW, analog IC guys long since have given up using implicit power
connections
Another sweeping statement from a narrow point of view, I think. A
counter-example is in order:
http://research.kek.jp/people/ikeda/openIP/
If you
Fixed, please cvs update and build again.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
On Jan 13, 2009, at 5:12 PM, r wrote:
Believe it or not, gEDA actually strongly focuses on the PCB flow.
It supports PCB flow, but it's not intended to be focused on any
specific application. That is part of its strength. I've designed
ASICs with it, so it's hardly restricted to PCB.
Am Mittwoch, den 14.01.2009, 19:45 + schrieb Kai-Martin Knaak:
The photo realistic png pictures posted on the list lately, made me want
to try the current head in CVS.
Latest pcb snapshot 20081128 supports photo realistic output.
___
On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:44 PM, Joerg wrote:
John Doty wrote:
On Jan 13, 2009, at 5:12 PM, r wrote:
BTW, analog IC guys long since have given up using implicit power
connections
Another sweeping statement from a narrow point of view, I think. A
counter-example is in order:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:57:07 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
Fixed, please cvs update and build again.
Works :-)
This was fast!
Do you know the source by heart?
---(kaimartin)---
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
Do you know the source by heart?
Some of it. In this case, I knew right away what the *bug* was, so
finding the right spot in the source was easy.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 19:06 +, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:58:40 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
Just tried this route to get a fresh geda from git:
$ git clone git://git.gpleda.org/gaf
$ cd gaf
$ gedit Makefile# change destination dir
$ make reconfig
$ make
John Doty wrote:
On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:44 PM, Joerg wrote:
John Doty wrote:
On Jan 13, 2009, at 5:12 PM, r wrote:
BTW, analog IC guys long since have given up using implicit power
connections
Another sweeping statement from a narrow point of view, I think. A
counter-example is in order:
Related to recent discussion:
Maybe it would be nice if we can define pins in gschem symbols which can
not be left floating, i.e. power pins and input of 74HCxx. (I forgot to
place all slots of an 74HC04 some time ago, resulting in open input
pins.)
Related to multiple subpart devices like FPGA
Hey gang,
This is a proposal that seems to have gotten lost in a debate if gEDA
is the right toolkit for someone.
So here is a technical discussion on how we could IMPROVE gEDA.
The proposal, please comment on lapses of functionality, and one
sidedness as I use gEDA in PCB and spice 'n
On Jan 14, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
Related to multiple subpart devices like FPGA or OpAmp with separate
power pins a SubParts attribute may be useful, like
SubParts=Bank0, Bank1, Power
indicating that a part consists of multiple sub-symbols, so that
gschem/gnetlist can
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:30:59 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
Try installing newer libtool.
Hmm. The libtool version I have installed is identical to the one in
debian/sid (v1.5.26) There is v2.26 in debian/experimental. However, apt-
get wants to remove guile-1.8 -- not good.
If that fails,
On Jan 14, 2009, at 1:49 PM, Joerg wrote:
John Doty wrote:
On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:44 PM, Joerg wrote:
John Doty wrote:
On Jan 13, 2009, at 5:12 PM, r wrote:
BTW, analog IC guys long since have given up using implicit power
connections
Another sweeping statement from a narrow point of
Larry Doolittle wrote:
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 09:40:08PM -0700, Eric Brombaugh wrote:
I've been glancing over some of the inexpensive Linux-based
netbooks lately - a tad underpowered, but potentially useful and cheap
enough to take a flyer on. I'm curious how useful a 1024x800 screen
Steven Michalske wrote:
Hey gang,
This is a proposal that seems to have gotten lost in a debate if gEDA
is the right toolkit for someone.
So here is a technical discussion on how we could IMPROVE gEDA.
The proposal, please comment on lapses of functionality, and one
sidedness as I
On Jan 14, 2009, at 2:06 PM, Joerg wrote:
Steven Michalske wrote:
Hey gang,
This is a proposal that seems to have gotten lost in a debate if gEDA
is the right toolkit for someone.
So here is a technical discussion on how we could IMPROVE gEDA.
The proposal, please comment on lapses of
On Jan 14, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Steven Michalske wrote:
Hey gang,
This is a proposal that seems to have gotten lost in a debate if gEDA
is the right toolkit for someone.
So here is a technical discussion on how we could IMPROVE gEDA.
The proposal, please comment on lapses of functionality,
Hi,
My temperature sensor/logger finaly works!
http://logonex.eu/tc/
Red: The temperature of the air coming out of my server.
Green: The temperature of my shirts hanging in the wardrobe. :-)
Blue: The temperature of the air in my flat.
The original plan was to place a sensor outside, but I was
John Doty wrote:
On Jan 14, 2009, at 1:49 PM, Joerg wrote:
John Doty wrote:
On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:44 PM, Joerg wrote:
John Doty wrote:
On Jan 13, 2009, at 5:12 PM, r wrote:
BTW, analog IC guys long since have given up using implicit power
connections
Another sweeping statement from a
On Jan 14, 2009, at 2:52 PM, John Doty wrote:
When adding a slotted or multi part component it should have an
attribute of an unique instantiation ID (UIID) that gets matched With
the other symbols of that device instance.
The way gnetlist works, the refdes is the identifier. Changing this
Stefan Salewski wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 13.01.2009, 13:11 -0800 schrieb Joerg:
I started out with Futurenet Dash-2 in 1986, then Dash-4, then
self-employed with Orcad as my tool, later through several versions of
that and a few years ago switched to Eagle. That's what I am using right
now
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 21:22 +, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:30:59 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
Try installing newer libtool.
Hmm. The libtool version I have installed is identical to the one in
debian/sid (v1.5.26) There is v2.26 in debian/experimental. However, apt-
Am Mittwoch, den 14.01.2009, 16:40 -0800 schrieb Joerg:
Eagle is IMHO pretty good but it does have one major disadvantage: No
hierarchy support. That pretty much restricts it to smaller projects. To
my surprise Cadsoft has never picked up on suggestions to fix that,
version 5 doesn't have
Stefan Salewski wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 14.01.2009, 16:40 -0800 schrieb Joerg:
Eagle is IMHO pretty good but it does have one major disadvantage: No
hierarchy support. That pretty much restricts it to smaller projects. To
my surprise Cadsoft has never picked up on suggestions to fix that,
[snip]
AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL
AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
I didn't try the AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL line, but I did revert
back to the original AM_PROG_LIBTOOL only line.
-Ales
___
geda-user mailing
Levente Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
My temperature sensor/logger finaly works!
http://logonex.eu/tc/
Red: The temperature of the air coming out of my server.
Green: The temperature of my shirts hanging in the wardrobe. :-)
Blue: The temperature of the air in my flat.
You are heating your flat
Steven Michalske wrote:
i did not say remove refdes.
each part has an additional identifier for its brethren slotted parts,
it UIID
so if one gets renamed, they all have to be renamed.
- if you edit the refdes attribute on a part with an UIID, gschem
would want to rename all
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:51:17 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
libgeda/configure.ac.in
Try just
LT_INIT([win32_dll])
LT_INIT([shared])
Configure complains if any of these lines is present.
LT_INIT()
This got me beyond the configure step.
But make install gets stuck further down the
On Jan 14, 2009, at 6:43 PM, Joerg wrote:
But I can only say it from the position of a user, not as a
programmer because that's the domain of the experts here.
Back in 1969, I was taught that the purpose of Fortran was to erase
this distinction, putting the power of the computer into the
John,
That was eloquently said.
I would suggest that geda/gaf users at a minimum should attempt to
understand the scripting language scheme and its interface to gaf.
Steve Meier
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 20:30 -0700, John Doty wrote:
On Jan 14, 2009, at 6:43 PM, Joerg wrote:
But I can only
I am working on a schematic and cut and pasted different pieces from
different schematics.
The numbering is a mess.
But neither grenum or renum_refdes will renumber it.
Is there a way to make it renumber like with --pageskip if the reference
designators already have a number? (ie C1 as opposed
Peter Clifton wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 21:22 +, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:30:59 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
Try installing newer libtool.
Hmm. The libtool version I have installed is identical to the one in
debian/sid (v1.5.26) There is v2.26 in
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:32:50 -0600, Kipton Moravec wrote:
It looks like if the part already has a number, neither renumber program
touches it. That is good in most cases, but not in my case. Is there a
secret way to force a renumber no matter whether the part has a
reference designator number
Is there a way to make it renumber like with --pageskip if the reference
designators already have a number? (ie C1 as opposed to just C?)
refdes_renum should do this. The --gentle flag is enabled by default
(i.e. only renumbers C? style refdes's). Use the --force flag to force
it to renumber
43 matches
Mail list logo
