John Doty wrote:
> but "pcb" is apparently almost completely =
> dependent on gnetlist.
No, it isn't. PCB defines its netlist input format; the schematic
capture folks like gEDA then adapt to it, in gEDA's case by way of a
gnetlist back-end.
My OSDCU board through which the characters of this
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 01:56:05 +0200
kai-martin knaak wrote:
> The patch applied without error to the my local copy of geda source
> from gpleda.org. It compiled straight through, too. But I can't seem
> to see check-boxes in the menus. Do I have to modify the menu in
> system-gschemrc for this to
Camille Delbegue wrote:
> I write a patch to migrate the pop-up-menu from GtkItemFactory (witch is
> deprecated since Gtk 2.4) to GtkUIManager.
>
> Why don't use GtkUIManager and GtkAction to manage the menubar toolbar and
> accelerator. This permit to use CheckMenuItem (ex : to active rubber-ban
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 12:02:28AM +0200, kai-martin knaak wrote:
> Andrew Poelstra wrote:
>
> > I am going with "View". Short and descriptive, and not used for
> > anything else that I'm aware of.
>
> Err, I use the word "view" a lot in connection with pcb:
> "bottom view", "top view", "flipped
On Aug 8, 2010, at 3:47 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote:
> John Doty wrote:
>
>>> Unfortunately we
>>> need gnetlist with guile to transfer information.
>>
>> Gnetlist is the *key* utility in the flow.
>
> It is just the glue between major components. No need to glorify this role.
On the contrary
On Aug 8, 2010, at 4:51 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote:
> No it is not. Even simple things like footprint names have a pretty rigid
> syntax to adhere to. The workflow breaks in cryptic ways if they are not
> obeyed.
This is a pure "pcb" limitation, not a gEDA limitation in general.
John Doty
John Doty wrote:
>> Unfortunately, it is just that -- a pin remapping facility. Slotting in
>> other EDA packages allows for much more: Different symbols that belong to
>> the same entity.
>
> We have no need for that.
^^
Who is this "we"?
> It "just works" without any special facility.
It
At 12:45 PM 8/8/2010, you wrote:
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 12:12 -0400, Rick Collins wrote:
>
> So this is a bug specific to the Windows version? How to report that?
>
> Rick
>
>
All fine for gerbv 2.4 shipped with Gentoo-Linux for AMD64.
It would be fine if you can test with multiple Windows box
On Aug 8, 2010, at 3:55 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote:
> John Doty wrote:
>
>> In gEDA, we have a facility for designating "slots" in components.
>> However, as DJ has pointed out, it is actually a general pin remapping
>> facility, and can be productively used as such.
>
> Unfortunately, it is j
Andrew Poelstra wrote:
> I am going with "View". Short and descriptive, and not used for
> anything else that I'm aware of.
Err, I use the word "view" a lot in connection with pcb:
"bottom view", "top view", "flipped view" ...
You did not comment on my suggestion "set"...
---<)kaimartin(>---
-
John Doty wrote:
> In gEDA, we have a facility for designating "slots" in components.
> However, as DJ has pointed out, it is actually a general pin remapping
> facility, and can be productively used as such.
Unfortunately, it is just that -- a pin remapping facility. Slotting in
other EDA pack
John Doty wrote:
>> Unfortunately we
>> need gnetlist with guile to transfer information.
>
> Gnetlist is the *key* utility in the flow.
It is just the glue between major components. No need to glorify this role.
> That's what makes it possible
> for gEDA to support abstract circuit analysis,
Steven Michalske wrote:
On Aug 8, 2010, at 8:26 AM, John Griessen wrote:
settings like "color all trace segments of net PWR1 from the gschem schematic
blue-green
whatever physical layer they are on. That would not be a popular plugin,
but could be helpful in some work flow.
It would be if it
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 05:43:26PM -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 06:52:37AM -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
> >
> > Yes, absolutely! But I cannot think of a good name :) "logical group"
> > is too long and ambiguous. Right now I am using "Group", but that's
> > even less us
On Aug 8, 2010, at 8:26 AM, John Griessen wrote:
> Andrew Poelstra wrote:
>
>>> A way to handle schematic driven work styles like Stefan seems to want is
>>> to make a PCB plugin to color traces differently, or just temporarily,
>>> as an aid to using the correct DRC rules as you draw, or a
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 12:12 -0400, Rick Collins wrote:
>
> So this is a bug specific to the Windows version? How to report that?
>
> Rick
>
>
All fine for gerbv 2.4 shipped with Gentoo-Linux for AMD64.
It would be fine if you can test with multiple Windows boxes, maybe it
is related to a s
At 12:00 PM 8/8/2010, you wrote:
Message: 6
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 17:46:06 +0200
From: kai-martin knaak
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Gerbv Problem Displaying Rounded Rectangles
To: geda-u...@seul.org
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Rick Collins wrote:
> I downloaded rev 2.4.
On Aug 7, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 11:33 -0600, John Doty wrote:
>
>>
>> Classification is opposed to modular, orthogonal design. Don't classify,
>> describe.
>
> And no, I do not really think so.
>
> Classification is fine, it is a very powerful inven
Rick Collins wrote:
> I downloaded rev 2.4.0 for Windows and viewed my Gerber files. I see
> that rounded rectangles done as a macro don't seem to display
> properly. I am creating the Gerber files with FreePCB and they
> display ok in GC-Preview. Here is a link to an image of the Gerbv
> displ
On Aug 7, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> Unfortunately we
> need gnetlist with guile to transfer information.
Gnetlist is the *key* utility in the flow. That's what makes it possible for
gEDA to support abstract circuit analysis, simulation, VLSI design, and of
course, printed cir
Andrew Poelstra wrote:
A way to handle schematic driven work styles like Stefan seems to want is
to make a PCB plugin to color traces differently, or just temporarily,
as an aid to using the correct DRC rules as you draw, or autoroute.
Rather than using a plugin system, I think we should allo
On Aug 7, 2010, at 3:00 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote:
> Stefan Salewski wrote:
>
>> A tractor is a fine versatile device, connected with a hanger we have a
>> powerful tool for carrying load. Really modular, with a well defined
>> interface. But many people prefer cars for the transport of people,
I downloaded rev 2.4.0 for Windows and viewed my Gerber files. I see
that rounded rectangles done as a macro don't seem to display
properly. I am creating the Gerber files with FreePCB and they
display ok in GC-Preview. Here is a link to an image of the Gerbv
display. http://arius.com/temp/
23 matches
Mail list logo
