All,
Thanks for the help on the sot23 diode. The symbol with just two pins
numbered 1 and 3 went into the layout tool just fine. I really thought I
needed to have a virtual pin 2 specified somehow but this seems to not be
the case. I will also check out the symbols created by others to see h
I know through the years there has been a lot of discussion on this issue but I
haven't been able to find the answer to my problem after searching the
archives. I'm wondering how to refer to a 3 pin footprint with a two pin
schematic symbol as is the case for a sot23 diode. My actual question
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "gEDA user mailing list"
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 2:51 AM
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: bom2 gnetlist
> Hi Ed,
>
> On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 19:12 -0500, Ed & Angie S. wrote:
>> I've seen some recent posts regarding the bom2 gnetlist report
I've seen some recent posts regarding the bom2 gnetlist report. I didn't see
an answer to my question so I'm writing to beg for help. I've played with bom2
and the attribs file and it seems to work for me. One thing bom2 does is put
all of the reference designators on one line which is what I
I've created schematics using gschem and plan to out source the board layout to
an allegro shop. I've generated the allegro files using a statement similar to
what the one below:
gnetlist -g allegro -o allegro_netlist.out page1.sch page2.sch page3.sch
I'm using the CD version of gEDA dated 02
Where is a description of how this backannotation works? Post layout
renumbering is my biggest concern for backannotation. What is the mechanism
for backannotation from PCB? If a third party tool provided a text based
reference designator cross reference file, would it be possible to use the
erence designators across all
pages of a flat schematic?
Ed
- Original Message -
From: "Levente" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Multiple symbol gschem components
> Ed & Ang
From: "John Luciani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "gEDA user mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 7:05 AM
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Multiple symbol gschem components
> On 11/5/07, Ed & Angie S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Oddly, grenum see
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "gEDA user mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Multiple symbol gschem components
>
> On Nov 5, 2007, at 9:18 PM, Ed & Angie S. wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to created a component for gschem where two s
I'm trying to created a component for gschem where two separate symbols are
used to represent a single component because of the large number of signals
involved. I found a recommendation in the archives suggesting that this could
be accomplished by simply setting the reference designator the sa
t;Peter Clifton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "gEDA user mailing list"
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: geda install on Ubuntu
>
> On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 14:38 -0500, Ed & Angie S. wrote:
>> Peter,
>>
>> Thanks for the q
;
To: "gEDA user mailing list"
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: geda install on Ubuntu
>
> On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 13:54 -0500, Ed & Angie S. wrote:
>> Peter,
>>
>> Thanks for the reply.
>>
>> My initial email was lac
uot;gEDA user mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 3:21 AM
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: schematic symbol text size for printing
> On Monday 04 June 2007 21:08:49 Ed & Angie S. wrote:
>
>> Using \_xxx\_ to create overbars works great to eliminate the need for
>> WYSIWIG f
printout.
Using \_xxx\_ to create overbars works great to eliminate the need for
WYSIWIG for overbars but it is still nice to see on the screen what you will
see in the printout.
Regards,
Ed Schurig
- Original Message -
From: "Ed & Angie S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[E
signer
> http://www.sentex.ca/~mjarabek
> --
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Ed & Angie S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:17:42
> To:"gEDA user mailing list"
> Subject:
quot;Ben Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "gEDA user mailing list"
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: schematic symbol text size for printing
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:50:24AM -0600, Ed & Angie S. wrote:
>> the text size
>> for schemati
I recently upgraded gEDA to the 02212007 CD release. I hadn't printed anything
right after the upgrade but noticed today that the text size for schematic
symbols when printed is much smaller than before the upgrade. The problem is
very evident for symbols which use a line above part of the sig
Stuart,
Thanks for the quick response.
I checked my system and libxaw7 is installed. There is a package called
libxaw7-dev that is not installed; could this be the problem?
I don't know whether Debian removed bzlib recently or not but I can get it
installed I think.
Once these dependency
Never mind the first part of my question, I found the debian install notes on
the cd which solved the problem. I am still wondering about libwxgtk2.6-dev
verses 2.4.
Ed
- Original Message -
From: Ed & Angie S.
To: gEDA user mailing list
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 11:1
I'm trying to install geda on a debian sarge linux system. Previously, I've
installed the Sarge debian geda package successfully and have been using gschem
and pcb. I would like to install the cd released in February but my limited
linux experience is showing up quickly in the process. I rece
Thanks, I will proceed with the installation.
Ed
- Original Message -
From: "al davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: gEDA upgrade
On Wednesday 02 May 2007, Ed & Angie S. wrote:
Can I install the newer v
I'm currently using an older version of gEDA that comes with Debian Sarge as a
Debian package. I will upgrade to Etch soon, however, the Debian etch gEDA
package is dated (10202006) and it sounds like lots of good stuff has been
improved since then. I've downloaded the gEDA 20070221 CD and wou
anuary 29, 2007 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: PCB multiple footprint selection
On 1/29/07, Ed & Angie S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At first,I was expecting the selection to only take components on the
active
layer. Then I thought turning off the opposite layer would disable the
co
I'm using PCB version 20050127 which is comes packaged with the stable version
of Debian (Sarge). When I select a group of components on one side of the
board using the mouse to draw a square with the select tool, components on the
other side of the board also get selected. Thus, when I move t
24 matches
Mail list logo
