Rick Collins wrote:
However, if you use an auto router, how do you tell it to
ignore the bottom pads?
switch off the bottom layer while auto routing.
I guess you can edit the footprint to remove the bottom pads, just
leaving the top pads,
In pcb thru hole pads are complex objects called
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak
kn...@iqo.uni-hannover.de wrote:
Hi.
I just hit a legitimate use case for mirrored footprints:
Memory chips frequently come in mirrored/not-mirrored versions,
needing mirrored foot prints to make high density memory cards.
--
On Nov 26, 2010, at 5:06 AM, Rick Collins gnuarm.2...@arius.com wrote:
At 05:05 PM 11/25/2010, you wrote:
On Nov 25, 2010, at 4:05 PM, Rick Collins gnuarm.2...@arius.com wrote:
At 05:01 AM 11/25/2010, you wrote:
I am missing the reason you must mirror the footprints, however.
I am missing the reason you must mirror the footprints, however.
Aren't the pins still in the same orientation they would be with the
standard footprint? Since your DIP packages are mounted in the
normal-side-up orientation, it seems the pins should be in the right
order, unless you have placed
On Nov 25, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Jan Martinek ho...@dp.fce.vutbr.cz wrote:
I am missing the reason you must mirror the footprints, however.
Aren't the pins still in the same orientation they would be with the
standard footprint? Since your DIP packages are mounted in the
normal-side-up
At 05:01 AM 11/25/2010, you wrote:
I am missing the reason you must mirror the footprints, however.
Aren't the pins still in the same orientation they would be with the
standard footprint? Since your DIP packages are mounted in the
normal-side-up orientation, it seems the pins should be in the
On Nov 25, 2010, at 4:05 PM, Rick Collins gnuarm.2...@arius.com wrote:
At 05:01 AM 11/25/2010, you wrote:
I am missing the reason you must mirror the footprints, however.
Aren't the pins still in the same orientation they would be with the
standard footprint? Since your DIP packages are
Steven Michalske wrote:
As the parts are mounted top side towered the board. I do
agree that they should be a externally mirrored footprint
though.
Still, my tool should not try to prevent me from doing stupid things or
play dirty tricks.
---)kaimartin(---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
At 05:05 PM 11/25/2010, you wrote:
On Nov 25, 2010, at 4:05 PM, Rick Collins gnuarm.2...@arius.com wrote:
At 05:01 AM 11/25/2010, you wrote:
I am missing the reason you must mirror the footprints, however.
Aren't the pins still in the same orientation they would be with the
standard
On 11/23/2010 03:52 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Hi.
I just hit a legitimate use case for mirrored footprints:
A layout sketch for dead-bug-prototyping. That is, glue the component
with its back to the board and do the wires manually. However, there seems
to be no way to mirror a footprint.
On 11/24/2010 05:13 PM, Jan Martinek wrote:
On 11/23/2010 03:52 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Hi.
I just hit a legitimate use case for mirrored footprints:
A layout sketch for dead-bug-prototyping. That is, glue the component
with its back to the board and do the wires manually. However, there
Jan Martinek wrote:
http://fyzika.fce.vutbr.cz/pub/bentlegs/
Ah! Toporouter in action! :-)
---)kaimartin(---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895
Universität Hannover, Inst. für Quantenoptik fax: +49-511-762-2211
Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:17:47 +0100
Jan Martinek ho...@dp.fce.vutbr.cz wrote:
On 11/24/2010 05:13 PM, Jan Martinek wrote:
On 11/23/2010 03:52 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Hi.
I just hit a legitimate use case for mirrored footprints:
A layout sketch for dead-bug-prototyping. That is, glue
Kai-Martin Knaak kn...@iqo.uni-hannover.de writes:
Hi.
I just hit a legitimate use case for mirrored footprints:
A layout sketch for dead-bug-prototyping. That is, glue the component
with its back to the board and do the wires manually. However, there seems
to be no way to mirror a
14 matches
Mail list logo
