Re: gEDA-user: TQFP adapter

2009-03-06 Thread DJ Delorie
> Yeah, I put the tqfp in but prior to doing the layout a friend > soldered a few micros to the adapters. Doh! They'll come off easy with a hotplate. Just put the adapter on it with a bit of solder or solder paste, turn on the hotplate, and wait. When the solder melts, lift off the chip.

Re: gEDA-user: TQFP adapter

2009-03-06 Thread Rob Butts
Yeah, I put the tqfp in but prior to doing the layout a friend soldered a few micros to the adapters. It is probably going to be easier to unsolder the chips. On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:56 PM, DJ Delorie <[1...@delorie.com> wrote: That's not a standard footprint, so you'll likely

Re: gEDA-user: TQFP adapter

2009-03-06 Thread DJ Delorie
That's not a standard footprint, so you'll likely be creating your own. *Maybe* one of the PGA footprints might work, but double check the pin numbers! Why do you need these adapters if you're making your own pcb? Just drop a tqfp44 footprint on your board and be done with it. ___

gEDA-user: TQFP adapter

2009-03-06 Thread Rob Butts
I got a TQFP44 to, what they call, DIP adapter. The link to these adapters is below. The website says it's a dip. I'd like to put the PCB footprint in a layout but I don't know what the footprint of the adapter is called. Regrettably the technical information on the adapter leav

Re: gEDA-user: TQFP footprint questions

2008-10-20 Thread Dan McMahill
Rob Butts wrote: >I'm trying to create a footprint for a Microchip signal controller. >I'm having trouble locating the horizontal pins with respect to the >vertical pins. The datasheet gives dimensions for chip width and >height, pinwidth and pin pitch. It doesn't give the distanc

Re: gEDA-user: TQFP footprint questions

2008-10-17 Thread John Griessen
DJ Delorie wrote: > Lacking any evidence to the contrary on the data sheet, I just assume > the pins (as a group) are centered on each edge. Me too. They probably have a loose tolerance for that dimension since it's a function of molding registration -- lead frame vs. body. John -- Ecosensory

Re: gEDA-user: TQFP footprint questions

2008-10-17 Thread DJ Delorie
> It doesn't give the distance from chip edge to were the first pin > from the edge. Lacking any evidence to the contrary on the data sheet, I just assume the pins (as a group) are centered on each edge. ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul

Re: gEDA-user: TQFP footprint questions

2008-10-17 Thread Ben Jackson
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 04:38:58PM -0400, Rob Butts wrote: > >I'm trying to create a footprint for a Microchip signal controller. >I'm having trouble locating the horizontal pins with respect to the >vertical pins. I've attached the script I use to make QFPs using jcl's perl module. F

gEDA-user: TQFP footprint questions

2008-10-17 Thread Rob Butts
I'm trying to create a footprint for a Microchip signal controller. I'm having trouble locating the horizontal pins with respect to the vertical pins. The datasheet gives dimensions for chip width and height, pinwidth and pin pitch. It doesn't give the distance from chip edge to w

Re: gEDA-user: tqfp

2008-02-24 Thread John Luciani
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Ian Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, I am using the footprint SQFP-50P-2280L1-2280L2-144N.fp for a > tqfp144. I've checked a printout of the gerber against an actual device > and it looks okay to me. I just need to check against the rest of the > guys

gEDA-user: tqfp

2008-02-24 Thread Ian Chapman
Hi, I am using the footprint SQFP-50P-2280L1-2280L2-144N.fp for a tqfp144. I've checked a printout of the gerber against an actual device and it looks okay to me. I just need to check against the rest of the guys for any comments? Regards Ian. ___

Re: gEDA-user: TQFP with 0.4mm pin pitch??

2008-02-22 Thread Wojciech Kazubski
>>LQFP128_14 > > Of course, you'll have to add the thermal pad yourself. > If you use the latest release of PCB (with hi-res QFP packages) you can use a following definition: define(`PKG_LQFP128_14', `PKG_LQFP_40(`$1',`$2',`$3',`128',`14',`970')'); Adding this line to geda.inc should make the fo

Re: gEDA-user: TQFP with 0.4mm pin pitch??

2008-02-21 Thread DJ Delorie
> LQFP128_14 Of course, you'll have to add the thermal pad yourself. ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

Re: gEDA-user: TQFP with 0.4mm pin pitch??

2008-02-21 Thread DJ Delorie
>I'm looking at the datasheet for a TI video digitizer, the TVP5154, > and its package (TQFP-128) appears to have 0.4mm pin spacing if I'm > reading the datasheet right. Has anyone else seen this package? Does > PCB have a footprint for this? (I don't see one offhand, if it is > indeed

Re: gEDA-user: TQFP with 0.4mm pin pitch??

2008-02-21 Thread John Luciani
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Dave McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I'm looking at the datasheet for a TI video digitizer, the TVP5154, > and its package (TQFP-128) appears to have 0.4mm pin spacing if I'm > reading the datasheet right. Has anyone else seen this package? Does > PCB

gEDA-user: TQFP with 0.4mm pin pitch??

2008-02-21 Thread Dave McGuire
I'm looking at the datasheet for a TI video digitizer, the TVP5154, and its package (TQFP-128) appears to have 0.4mm pin spacing if I'm reading the datasheet right. Has anyone else seen this package? Does PCB have a footprint for this? (I don't see one offhand, if it is indeed 0.4mm)

Re: gEDA-user: TQFP Packages

2007-04-14 Thread Peter L. Berghold
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 22:42 -0400, John Luciani wrote: > I have QFP-65P-1780L1-1780L2-80N which is > 17.8 x 17.8 with a pitch of 0.65 at > OK... so I have it already and didn't know it. Thanks folks! -- Peter L. Berghold Unix Professional [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: gEDA-user: TQFP Packages

2007-04-14 Thread John Luciani
On 4/14/07, Peter L. Berghold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi folks, Before I make myself crazy and try re-inventing the wheel, are there any PCB footprints out there for 80 pin TQFP packages? I have QFP-65P-1780L1-1780L2-80N which is 17.8 x 17.8 with a pitch of 0.65 at http://www.luciani.org/g

Re: gEDA-user: TQFP Packages

2007-04-14 Thread DJ Delorie
> Before I make myself crazy and try re-inventing the wheel, are there > any PCB footprints out there for 80 pin TQFP packages? There's one in ~geda. Watch out for pin pitch - an 80 pin QFP comes in 0.65mm (14mm) and 0.50mm (12mm) pitch. ___ geda-use

gEDA-user: TQFP Packages

2007-04-14 Thread Peter L. Berghold
Hi folks, Before I make myself crazy and try re-inventing the wheel, are there any PCB footprints out there for 80 pin TQFP packages? I have a project that I'm looking to design/build that I"m planning to use a PIC 18F8520 for and looking at the data sheets for it I notice that's the package it

Re: gEDA-user: TQFP Footprints

2006-10-15 Thread John Luciani
On 10/15/06, Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm looking into using an ATMega2560 for an upcoming project. Does anyone have a TQFP-100 footprint available? -Lares I have a footprint called SQFP-50P-1680L1-1680L2-100N on my website. 100 pins with a pitch of 0.5mm. Check the dimensions

Re: gEDA-user: TQFP Footprints

2006-10-15 Thread Dan McMahill
Lares Moreau wrote: I'm looking into using an ATMega2560 for an upcoming project. Does anyone have a TQFP-100 footprint available? There is a TQFP100_14 in the ~geda library which ships with pcb. There is a preview at: http://www.gedasymbols.org/footprints/m4lib/TQFP100_14.fp note that

gEDA-user: TQFP Footprints

2006-10-15 Thread Lares Moreau
I'm looking into using an ATMega2560 for an upcoming project. Does anyone have a TQFP-100 footprint available? -Lares ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

Re: gEDA-user: TQFP package problem

2006-07-27 Thread Steve Meier
I am not sure what you mean here Stuart? There is a risk that a user would pick a symbol with pin numbers that match one physical foot print but at layout time would select a foot print for a different packaging of the device. I sure would like to at least warn a user that "hey that foot print doe

Re: gEDA-user: TQFP package problem

2006-07-27 Thread Stuart Brorson
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have problem with gsch2pcb and /usr/share/gEDA/sym/micro/ATmega128-3.sym. I added this one to .sch file run gsch2pcb on it and get this result: U1: can't find PCB element for footprint TQFP64 (value=unknown) So device U1 will not be in the layou

Re: gEDA-user: TQFP package problem

2006-07-27 Thread watashi_metan
> > I have problem with gsch2pcb and > > /usr/share/gEDA/sym/micro/ATmega128-3.sym. > > I added this one to .sch file run gsch2pcb on it and get this result: > > > > U1: can't find PCB element for footprint TQFP64 (value=unknown) > > So device U1 will not be in the layout. > > > > Other packages

Re: gEDA-user: TQFP package problem

2006-07-27 Thread Dan McMahill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have problem with gsch2pcb and /usr/share/gEDA/sym/micro/ATmega128-3.sym. I added this one to .sch file run gsch2pcb on it and get this result: U1: can't find PCB element for footprint TQFP64 (value=unknown) So device U1 will not be in the layout. Other packages like

gEDA-user: TQFP package problem

2006-07-27 Thread watashi_metan
I have problem with gsch2pcb and /usr/share/gEDA/sym/micro/ATmega128-3.sym. I added this one to .sch file run gsch2pcb on it and get this result: U1: can't find PCB element for footprint TQFP64 (value=unknown) So device U1 will not be in the layout. Other packages like DIP or SO are working but w