Hi Marcus,
I’d also say this would be a great topic for the User Workshop at ISCA:
http://www.gem5.org/User_workshop_2015
Andreas
On 03/03/2015 15:14, Ali Saidi via gem5-dev gem5-dev@gem5.org wrote:
Hi Marcus,
Option 1 is probably the most preferred route as the code is much more
likely to
Hi Marcus,
Option 1 is probably the most preferred route as the code is much more
likely to say in-sync and compatible if it¹s in the same repository and
tested along side gem5. The best way to proceed with that option is to
post your patches to the gem5 review board http://reviews.gem5.org. If
Hi,
I am a senior at Colorado State University working with two other students
under Dr. Sudeep Pasricha on a senior design project. We have created a
GUI to aid in configuring gem5 simulations.
It currently supports a variety of command line options which are supplied
to the se.py and fs.py
So what does the GUI do? Can you drag and drop different components and
then connect as required? Or is it that you can just set values for
different variables? Can you provide some screen shots?
--
Nilay
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Marcus Johnson via gem5-dev wrote:
Hi,
I am a senior at Colorado
* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/30.eio-mp/alpha/eio/simple-timing-mp
CHANGED!
* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/20.eio-short/alpha/eio/simple-timing
CHANGED!
scons: *** Error 1
scons: *** Error 1
* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/60.rubytest/alpha/linux/rubytest-ruby
passed.
*
On Feb. 24, 2015, 8:26 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
src/sim/sim_events.hh, line 77
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2665/diff/2/?file=43797#file43797line77
seems like it would be safer just to say:
if (scheduled())
deschedule();
then if some
On Feb. 24, 2015, 8:26 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
src/sim/sim_events.hh, line 77
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2665/diff/2/?file=43797#file43797line77
seems like it would be safer just to say:
if (scheduled())
deschedule();
then if some
On Feb. 25, 2015, 4:26 a.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
src/sim/sim_events.hh, line 77
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2665/diff/2/?file=43797#file43797line77
seems like it would be safer just to say:
if (scheduled())
deschedule();
then if some
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2665/#review5933
---
Ship it!
Thanks for the changes!
- Steve Reinhardt
On March 3, 2015,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/
---
(Updated March 4, 2015, 12:56 a.m.)
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/
---
(Updated March 4, 2015, 1:04 a.m.)
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2665/
---
(Updated March 3, 2015, 11:43 p.m.)
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/
---
(Updated March 4, 2015, 12:47 a.m.)
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/
---
(Updated March 4, 2015, 1:07 a.m.)
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
On Feb. 25, 2015, 4:32 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
Took me longer to review this just because I'm not sure what to think of
it. It's not pretty, but I don't have better ideas, so it's hard to object.
One thing that bothers me is that, while it's noble to try and generalize
On Feb. 25, 2015, 4:26 a.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
src/sim/sim_events.hh, line 77
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2665/diff/2/?file=43797#file43797line77
seems like it would be safer just to say:
if (scheduled())
deschedule();
then if some
On Feb. 25, 2015, 1:55 a.m., Nathan Binkert wrote:
Not to be difficult, but is it possible for Sandia to just use the standard
gem5 license (which is basically the same thing you've already got)? And
if yes, can we just include it in the main tree instead of ext?
I've reached out to
On Feb. 25, 2015, 4:32 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
Took me longer to review this just because I'm not sure what to think of
it. It's not pretty, but I don't have better ideas, so it's hard to object.
One thing that bothers me is that, while it's noble to try and generalize
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2619/#review5927
---
Ship it!
Some minor formatting issues, but overall it looks good.
19 matches
Mail list logo
