yar Samani via gem5-users
Sent: November 12, 2020 2:29 PM
To: gem5 users mailing list
Cc: Mahyar Samani
Subject: [gem5-users] Re: XBar on dcache port impacting BW?
Hey Fisher,
I'm not sure if that is correct as every packet spends at least one cycle on
the XBar (even in real hardware), however
59 AM
> *To:* gem5 users mailing list
> *Cc:* Mahyar Samani
> *Subject:* [gem5-users] Re: XBar on dcache port impacting BW?
>
>
>
> Hey Fisher,
>
> The XBar can at maximum deliver a bandwidth equivalent to 1 packet size
> (which I believe is 64 bytes) per cycl
yar Samani via gem5-users
Sent: October 20, 2020 8:59 AM
To: gem5 users mailing list
Cc: Mahyar Samani
Subject: [gem5-users] Re: XBar on dcache port impacting BW?
Hey Fisher,
The XBar can at maximum deliver a bandwidth equivalent to 1 packet size (which
I believe is 64 bytes) per cycle (
Hey Fisher,
The XBar can at maximum deliver a bandwidth equivalent to 1 packet size
(which I believe is 64 bytes) per cycle (e.g. if the clk_freq is set to
1GHz, it will at max deliver 64GBps). Does this information comply with the
results you are seeing?
Best Regards,
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at
